There is a tendency to think of consumer fraud and misrepresentation as intentional acts that deceive consumers into engaging in transactions that they would not otherwise engage in. A recent case demonstrates that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and at least one federal district court, take a much different view — that misrepresentation exists simply because statements later turn out to be incorrect, regardless of whether the person making the representation may have had a reasonable belief and good faith legal basis for the belief before making the representation.
In 2014, the CFPB filed a suit against CashCall Inc., alleging that CashCall engaged in unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices (UDAAP). On June 30, 2016, the CFPB filed a motion for partial summary judgment in the case. On Aug. 31, 2016, a U.S. district court granted the CFPB’s motion for partial summary judgment and found that CashCall’s actions were deceptive.
Originally published in Law360, New York on September 28, 2016.
Please see full publication below for more information.