Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff

Foley & Lardner LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Inter Partes Review Proceedings

Share:

Sanofi Seeks IPR of Cabilly Patent

On July 27, 2015, Sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed a petition for Inter Partes Review (IPR) of the “Cabilly II” patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,331,415. The Cabilly II patent granted shortly after I...more

7/31/2015 - Biotechnology Bristol-Myers Squibb Genentech Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Regeneron Sanofi-Aventis USPTO

Federal Circuit Upholds Broadest Reasonable Interpretation in Inter Partes Review

A divided Federal Circuit denied the petition for rehearing en banc that would have required the court to revisit its decision in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC (Fed Cir 2015), that upheld the USPTO’s use of the...more

7/23/2015 - America Invents Act Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Claim Construction En Banc Review Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Pending Legislation Petition For Rehearing Popular Post-Grant Review USPTO

Federal Circuit Reverses Unreasonable PTAB Claim Construction, Upholds Idle Free Standard for Motions to Amend

The Federal Circuit decision in Microsoft Corp. v. Proxyconn, Inc., addressed several important issues relating to post-grant patent trials conducted by the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), including the PTAB’s...more

6/24/2015 - Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Claim Construction Inter Partes Review Proceedings Microsoft Motion to Amend Patent Invalidity Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Post-Grant Review Remand USPTO

Another Sequenom Patent Appeal Heads to the Federal Circuit

While Sequenom’s appeal of the district court’s summary judgment of invalidity of U.S. Patent 6,258,540 under 35 USC § 101 has been pending at the Federal Circuit, the USPTO has been considering the validity of the patent...more

6/3/2015 - Appeals DNA Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Sequenom

Keeping Up With Kyle Bass

In the few weeks since I first wrote about Kyle Bass and the Coalition for Affordable Drugs he formed to challenge Orange Book-listed patents that he believes “have little value other than to drive up prescription drug...more

5/6/2015 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Orange Book Patent-in-Suit Patents Pharmaceutical Patents

Stricter Standing for Inter Partes Review?

Neither the statutes nor the regulations governing Inter Partes Review (IPR) require the party challenging the patent to have been charged with infringement, or even to establish any interest in practicing the claimed subject...more

4/15/2015 - Fund Managers Inter Partes Review Proceedings Orange Book Patent Infringement Patents Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Pharmaceutical Patents Prescription Drugs Standing

Federal Circuit Affirms Use of Broadest Reasonable Interpretation of Claims in IPR Proceedings

In affirming the decision of the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC, the Federal Circuit upheld the PTAB’s use of the “broadest reasonable interpretation” of the claims in...more

2/6/2015 - Cuozzo Speed Technologies Inter Partes Review Proceedings Jurisdiction Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Prior Art

Three Patent Issues to Watch in 2015

Well, 2014 was a busy year in patent law, and it wasn’t all good news for patent holders. The Supreme Court made 35 USC § 101 a significant hurdle to patenting inventions across a broad swath of technologies, gave more teeth...more

1/8/2015 - Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard CLS Bank v Alice Corp Inter Partes Review Proceedings Interim Guidance Limelight v Akamai Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Patent Infringement Patents Post-Grant Review SCOTUS USPTO

Is Evidence of Obviousness Always Required?

In K/S HIMPP v. Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that upheld the decision of the Central Reexamination Unit Examiner that refused to hold...more

6/13/2014 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Obviousness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents USPTO

Federal Circuit Finds Consumer Watchdog Lacks Standing to Appeal Reexamination Decision Upholding WARF Stem Cell Patent

In Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, the Federal Circuit held that an inter partes reexamination requester must establish an injury in fact sufficient to confer Article III standing in order to appeal...more

6/6/2014 - America Invents Act Appeals Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Post-Grant Review Stem cells WARF

Court Won't Review USPTO Denial of Inter Partes Review

In a decision issued on April 18, 2014, Judge Payne of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the USPTO’s motion to dismiss the case brought by Dominion Dealer Solutions, LLC to challenge the...more

4/21/2014 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Litigation Patents USPTO

Dominion Dealer Solutions Seeks Review of USPTO Decisions Denying Inter Partes Review

On October 15, 2013, Dominion Dealer Solutions, LLC filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia seeking review of the USPTO’s decisions denying petitions to institute inter partes review...more

11/1/2013 - America Invents Act Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Reform Patents Post-Grant Review USPTO

USPTO Rules Eliminate Inter Partes Review Dead Zone

On March 25, 2013, the USPTO published final rule changes to “Implement the Technical Corrections to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act as to Inter Partes Review.” The rule changes have an effective date of March 25, 2013,...more

4/5/2013 - America Invents Act Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Reform Patents Post-Grant Review USPTO

A Look at the Technical Amendments to the America Invents Act (AIA) Made by HR 6621

On January 14, 2013, President Obama signed HR 6621 into law. The title of HR 6621 is “To correct and improve certain provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act,” but it also makes changes to other provisions of U.S....more

2/7/2013 - America Invents Act Derivation Proceeding Inter Partes Review Proceedings Interference Claims Interference Proceeding Patent Reform Patent Term Adjustment Patents USPTO

USPTO Board Holds That Complaint Dismissed Without Prejudice Does Not Bar Inter Partes Review

In a decision granting (in part) a Request for Inter Partes Review, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) held that an infringement complaint that was dismissed without prejudice did not bar the Request for Inter...more

2/5/2013 - Infringement Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents USPTO

Federal Circuit Holds the Reexamination Door Open in In Re Baxter

When the Federal Circuit denied the Request for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing en banc in In re Baxter, the court let stand its two decisions that affirmed conflicting rulings on the validity of the same patent....more

11/30/2012 - Inter Partes Review Proceedings Obviousness Patents Split of Authority

16 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×