This past Friday, the Second Circuit reversed a lower court’s denial of a motion to compel arbitration in a putative consumer class action against fintech company Klarna. Edmundson v. Klarna, Inc., Case No. 22-557-cv (2d...more
The Eighth Circuit recently affirmed the dismissal of a class action alleging that Unilever’s differential pricing of men’s and women’s antiperspirants violated the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA). In doing so,...more
In a recent opinion out of the Southern District of New York, Judge William H. Pauley III certified three classes of plaintiffs in New York, California, and Florida who allege that KIND LLC, the manufacturer of KIND Bars,...more
5/26/2021
/ Advertising ,
All Natural ,
Class Action ,
Class Certification ,
Corporate Counsel ,
False Advertising ,
Food Labeling ,
Food Marketing ,
Nutrition Facts Labels ,
Predominance Requirement ,
Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices
We previously blogged about the dismissal without prejudice of a putative consumer class action alleging that the well-known confectioner Ghirardelli misled consumers into believing its “Premium Baking Chips Classic White...more
9/1/2020
/ Advertising ,
Amended Complaints ,
Consumers Legal Remedies Act ,
Corporate Counsel ,
False Advertising ,
Food Labeling ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Product Labels ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Settlement Agreements ,
Unfair Competition Law (UCL) ,
Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices
The Southern District of New York recently dismissed a putative class action against Cytosport, the maker of Muscle Milk protein powder. The plaintiff, Orlando Bautista, alleged that he bought a container of Muscle Milk...more
1/3/2017
/ Advertising ,
Class Action ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Dietary Supplements ,
Dismissals ,
False Advertising ,
Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Fraud ,
Negligent Misrepresentation ,
Nutritional Supplements ,
Pleading Standards ,
Putative Class Actions ,
Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices ,
Unjust Enrichment
On February 29, 2016, the Supreme Court declined to review a Ninth Circuit decision holding that there was no likelihood of confusion, and therefore no trademark infringement, where Amazon.com responded to consumer searches...more
On November 3, 2015, Judge Alsup of the Northern District of California denied Cricket Wireless’s motion to enforce an arbitration clause against customers who say they never saw or agreed to the clause.
Plaintiffs...more