Unfair Pricing

News & Analysis as of

August 2013: Class Action Litigation Update - Retail Pricing: The New Class Action Beachhead.

“Labels matter.” With those two words, penned in Kwikset v. Superior Court, 51 Cal. 4th 310 (2011), the California Supreme Court opened up a new frontier for class actions against product manufacturers and retailers. Any...more

Federal Court Dismisses Class Action Complaint Based on Pre-Complaint Offer of Settlement

In Datascope Analytics, LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications, Inc., No. 13-608, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 70215 (E.D. Pa. May 17, 2013), the District Court dismissed a proposed class action at the inception of the lawsuit because...more

California Consumers Have Standing to Sue When Merchandise Is Falsely Advertised as “On Sale”

The Ninth Circuit has held that allegations a consumer was misled into purchasing merchandise based on false advertising that the items had been marked down from a fictitious “original” price are sufficient to confer standing...more

Comparing Suicide Pricing by Lawyers and Antitrust Claims for Below-Cost Pricing

Seemingly unrelated, the WSJ’s discussion of antitrust claims challenging below-cost pricing (Antitrust Busters with Gavels, 4/26/2013) and the Internet tabloid Above the Law’s discussion of increased use of “suicide pricing”...more

DOJ Charges Community Bank With Discriminatory Pricing Of Unsecured Consumer Loans

On February 19, the DOJ announced a settlement with a $338 million Texas community bank to resolve allegations that the bank engaged in a pattern or practice of pricing discrimination on the basis of national origin....more

Stainless Steel Sinks Industry Sees Benefits Of Relief From Unfair Imports From China By Brian McGill

Significant preliminary antidumping (“AD”) duties were imposed on imports of drawn stainless steel sinks from China on September 27, 2012, with cash deposit rates ranging from 54.25 percent to 76.53 percent. These margins had...more

6 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1