Latest Publications

Share:

No Motivation to Combine Necessary Where Secondary Reference Only Explains Primary Reference

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) finding of obviousness over a patent owner’s challenge to the “combination” of prior art, explaining that no motivation to combine...more

Where Product Materially Changed, Collateral Estoppel Is Stamped Out

In its third ruling in an ongoing patent dispute, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that a grant of summary judgment barring an infringement action under the principle of collateral estoppel was legal...more

Similarity in Revised PTAB Claim Construction Avoids APA Misstep

In addressing whether a claim construction adopted by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) “changed theories midstream,” the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s construction—and its...more

Failure to Comply with Local Rules Risks Entry of Default Judgment

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld the entry of a default judgment against a copyright infringement and trade secrets defendant who ignored several district court orders and warnings regarding compliance...more

Burden Is on Trustee to Show Insolvency at Time of Transfer

The US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of a fraudulent conveyance claim for a “blocking right” and right of first refusal under a patent transfer agreement, addressing the...more

One Is the Loneliest Number to Institute . . . Two Is Just as Odd as One, but Under SAS It’s Simply All or None

Addressing whether the review of a single claim on a single challenged ground in a petition may be sufficient to institute inter partes review (IPR) for all challenged claims on all challenged grounds, the Patent Trial and...more

No Waiver on Non-Instituted Claims when Request Made Shortly After SAS

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted a motion for remand, finding that a party did not waive SAS-based relief when it requested reconsideration of non-instituted claims shortly after the issuance of the...more

Walk Carefully at This Intersection: Willful Infringement ≠ Enhanced Damages

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed an award of enhanced damages even while affirming a jury finding of willfulness (based on substantial evidence), explaining that the award was not adequately explained...more

When SCOTUS Said No Partial Institution, It Meant All Challenged Grounds

In light of the Supreme Court of the United States decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu (IP Update, Vol. 21, No. 5), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit remanded an appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more

PTAB Need Not Consider Prior Art of Record Not Relied on in IPR Petition

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld an inter partes review (IPR) determination that challenged claims were not obvious over two references asserted in requestor’s IPR petition without consideration of other...more

No Sua Sponte Remand for Erroneously Limited Post-SAS Final Written Decisions

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that, post-SAS, it possessed jurisdiction to hear an appeal from an inter partes review (IPR) even where the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) erred in limiting its...more

An “Unremarkable Proposition”: En Banc Denials Reaffirm that § 101 Analysis May Contain Underlying Factual Issues

The per curiam US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied petitioners’ requests for en banc review in the Berkheimer and Aatrix Software, Inc., cases, holding that the issue of whether a claim element is well...more

The Cases that Never Were: Nullified Litigation and the One-Year Bar

Addressing whether either of two previously filed district court actions precluded institution of an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding under the one-year time bar of 35 USC § 315(b), the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more

“Specific Reference” Required to Claim Priority

Addressing the issues of priority and incorporation by reference, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB’s) prior art rejection of a patent based on the priority date...more

Supreme Court to PTAB: All or Nothing at All

In a 5–4 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed a decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that once the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) institutes an inter partes review...more

Great Minds Don’t Always Think Alike: License Limitations Must Be Explicit

In addressing whether a non-exclusive copyright licensee was permitted to use a commercial printing service in furtherance of its “non-commercial” rights granted by a public license, the US Court of Appeals for the Second...more

5/4/2018  /  Copyright , FedEx , Licensees

US Supreme Court For AIA Proceedings, All or Nothing at All

In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court reversed a decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, holding that once the Patent Trial & Appeal Board of US Patent & Trademark Office (PTAB or Board) institutes an...more

A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words, but Owning a Piece of the Bundle Is Priceless.

In a case where a licensee granted the right to sue was bounced by the district court for lack of standing, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that under § 501(b) of the Copyright Act, assignees of the bare...more

Former Band Member Must Sail On Down the Line

The US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld a permanent injunction precluding a musician from using the trademarks of his former band. Commodores Entertainment Corp. v. Thomas McClary, Case No. 16-15794 (11th Cir.,...more

Walker Process Claims Don’t Belong in the Federal Circuit

In the continuing tug-of-war between antitrust and intellectual property, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit transferred a Walker Process claim to the Fifth Circuit for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Xitronix...more

Disclaiming Yourself into an Adverse Judgment

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that because a patent owner disclaimed all claims challenged in an inter partes review (IPR) prior to institution, the IPR...more

“Everyday I’m Hustlin’” to Ensure Valid Registrations

Addressing for the first time the 2008 amendment to the Copyright Act’s effect on the standard for invalidating a copyright registration, the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit held that a copyright registration may...more

Cert Alert: Cert Granted to Consider Whether Lost Profit Damages May Include Overseas Activities

The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to consider whether US patent owners can recoup some profits lost because of infringement that occurs outside of the United States. WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp.,...more

Federal Circuit to Rehear Fee Shifting Decision En Banc

In June 2017, a panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that under 35 USC § 145, a court can award attorneys’ fees to the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), regardless of whether the applicant,...more

Remand Where PTAB Decision Does Not Explain Reasoning, Account for All Evidence

In reviewing a decision from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) deciding three interferences involving competing claims directed to testing methods for fetal aneuploidies, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit...more

134 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide