Paul Devinsky

Paul Devinsky

McDermott Will & Emery

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Patents

Share:

Korea Quarterly - August 2016

Controlling Costs in International Arbitration - Arbitration is an efficient means for resolving business disputes because it offers more flexibility than court proceedings and enables the parties to choose arbitrators...more

8/22/2016 - America Invents Act Arbitration Computer-Related Inventions Covered Business Method Patents Internal Investigations International Arbitration Korea Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents USPTO White Collar Crimes

Inducement and Risk of Liability for Worldwide Sales

The Supreme Court of the United States agreed to review a decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding active inducement infringement under 35 USC § 271(f)(1) in a case important to US manufacturers...more

7/29/2016 - Appeals Certiorari Component Parts Doctrine Cross-Border Transactions Damages Induced Infringement Judgment As A Matter Of Law Life Technologies v Promega Manufacturer Liability Patent Infringement Patents Reversal SCOTUS

Inter Partes Review Institution Decisions Not Appealable, Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Remains Standard

In Depth - The Supreme Court of the United States (Justice Breyer writing for the majority) affirmed a US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision barring judicial review of most decisions regarding institution...more

6/30/2016 - America Invents Act Appeals Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Claim Construction Cuozzo Speed Technologies v Lee Inter Partes Review Proceedings Judicial Review Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents SCOTUS Standard of Review USPTO

Federal Circuit Precedents on Domestic and International Patent Exhaustion Principles Remain Unchanged (Lexmark Int’l, Inc., v....

The en banc U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its long awaited (10-2) decision, reaffirming the court’s prior rulings in Mallinckrodt and Jazz Photo that a seller can use its patent rights to block resale...more

2/24/2016 - Appeals First Sale Doctrine Foreign Sales Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons Lexmark Patent Exhaustion Patent Infringement Patents Quanta Resales Agreements

Supreme Court to Review Federal Circuit Standard for Treble Damage Awards Under § 284 - Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse...

Taking its first IP cases of the current session, the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in two § 284 enhanced fee award patent cases: Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., S.Ct. No. 14-1513 (Oct. 19, 2015) and...more

11/5/2015 - Attorney's Fees Certiorari Damages Enhanced Penalties Halo v Pulse Octane Fitness v. ICON Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS Stryker Ortho Treble Damages Willful Infringement

PTAB Continues to Evolve Its Covered Business Method Patent Jurisprudence - International Internet Technologies, LLC and Red Rock...

In two related decisions, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) determined that patents directed to a personal computer interactive lottery/casino type game that allows players to purchase game tickets in the form...more

10/7/2015 - Abstract Ideas America Invents Act CLS Bank v Alice Corp Covered Business Method Proceedings Patent Expiration Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Versata

PTAB Petition Must Specifically Explain the Grounds for Invalidity - Apple Inc., v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.

In a trio of orders addressing the extent of express explanation required in a petition for post-grant review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) found each petition defective for lack of explanation regarding...more

9/9/2015 - Apple Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Post-Grant Review Prior Art

Teva Review Standard Controls Lighting Ballast on Remand - Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.

In yet another post-Teva claim construction case (see discussion of Teva v. Sandoz, Shire Development v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Kaneka Corp. v. Xiamen Kingdomway Grp. and TomTom, Inc. v. Adolph cases (this edition) the U.S....more

7/31/2015 - Appeals Claim Construction Clear Error Standard De Novo Standard of Review Extrinsic Evidence Means-Plus-Function Patent Infringement Patents Standard of Review Teva v Sandoz

Expert Testimony Not Always a Guarantee for Appellate Review with Deference - Shire Development v. Watson Pharmaceuticals; Teva...

Addressing the impact of expert testimony used during claim construction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in a case remanded by the U.S. Supreme Court, following its January 5, 2015 decision in Teva...more

7/30/2015 - Appeals Claim Construction Clear Error Standard Expert Testimony Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Patents Shire Development v Watson Standard of Review Teva v Sandoz

No “Apportionment” Requirement for Design Patent Damages - Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Am., Inc.

Addressing the issue of damages for trade dress and design patents, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the bulk of Apple’s roughly $930 million damages award, noting that there is no apportionment...more

7/3/2015 - Appeals Apple Apple v Samsung Apportionment Design Patent Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Samsung Trade Dress

What Was Old Is New Again for Means + Function Claim Elements

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc for the limited purpose of revisiting when claims invoke the means-plus-function language of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 6 (§ 112(6)) (now § 112(f)) replaced a part of...more

6/19/2015 - Intellectual Property Litigation Means-Plus-Function Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Software

Good Faith Belief in Invalidity No Defense to Active Inducement

The U.S. Supreme Court (Justice Kennedy writing for the majority) has now eliminated a defense that has been available to parties accused of actively inducing patent infringement under 35 USC § 271(b). The Court held that a...more

5/29/2015 - Cisco Cisco v CommilUSA Good Faith Honest Belief Defense Induced Infringement Patent Infringement Patent Invalidity Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

Federal Circuit to Consider International Patent Exhaustion En Banc - Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has sua sponte ordered an en banc hearing to consider the issue of international patent exhaustion. Lexmark International, Inc. v. Impression Products, Inc., Case No. 14-1617...more

5/15/2015 - Appeals Lexmark Patent Exhaustion Patent Litigation Patents

The Apparently Never-Ending Story of Bard v. W.L. Gore - Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. v. W.L. Gore &...

In a case centered about patent that matured from an application filed 40 years ago, a case that has been pending for 12 years and that just completed its fourth engagement at the appellate level, the U.S. Court of Appeals...more

3/3/2015 - Appeals Medical Devices Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents

Defense of Laches in Patent Cases to Be Reviewed En Banc - SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag, et al. v. First Quality Baby Products,...

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has order for en banc review of the defense of laches in patent cases in order to evaluate the impact of the Supreme Court’s laches decision in the copyright case Petrella v....more

2/16/2015 - Infringement Intellectual Property Litigation Laches Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Petrella v. MGM Statute of Limitations

Supreme Court: Claim Construction Is Subject to Hybrid Review - Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. Sandoz, Inc.

In a 7–2 decision penned by Justice Breyer, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the de novo standard as the sole standard of review issues arising in claim construction. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. Sandoz,...more

2/4/2015 - Claim Construction Clear Error Standard De Novo Standard of Review Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Pharmaceutical Patents SCOTUS Teva v Sandoz

Patent Claim Construction Now Subject to Hybrid Review

In a 7–2 decision penned by Justice Breyer, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the de novo standard as the sole standard of review of issues arising in claim construction. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. Sandoz,...more

1/23/2015 - Claim Construction Clear Error Standard De Novo Standard of Review Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Pharmaceutical Patents SCOTUS Teva v Sandoz

Back to the Future—Supreme Court to Review Rule On Post-Expiration Patent Royalties

Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in affirming a district court decision that toy maker Marvel was not required to make payments after the expiration of a patent,...more

1/20/2015 - IP License Kimble v Marvel Enterprises License Agreements Patent Exhaustion Patent Royalties Patents SCOTUS

Supreme Court to Consider Scope of “Good Faith” Belief and the Intent Requirement of § 271(b)

Commil USA v. Cisco Systems - Earlier this year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that a good-faith belief that a patent is invalid may negate the element of intent required to prove induced...more

1/20/2015 - Appeals Cisco v CommilUSA Good Faith Induced Infringement Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

Post-Alice Federal Circuit Finds Internet Advertising Method to Not Be Patent Eligible

Citing the Supreme Court of the United States’ Spring 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed itself and concluded that a claimed method for distributing online...more

11/19/2014 - Advertising Appeals CLS Bank v Alice Corp Copyright Digital Media Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Transformativeness Ultramercial v Hulu WildTangent v Ultramercial

Post-Therasense IC Alive and Kicking at the Federal Circuit

Apotex Inc. v. UCB, Inc. - After finding that a patent owner had made several misrepresentations to the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) during prosecution, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded...more

10/2/2014 - Administrative Appeals Apotex Misrepresentation Patent Litigation Patents Pharmaceutical Industry Pharmaceutical Patents USPTO

Federal Circuit Orders Stay Pending Completion of CBM Review

Applying section 18(a)(1) of the America Invents Act (AIA) to an issue of first impression, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court, ordering a stay of the district court...more

7/17/2014 - America Invents Act Appeals Covered Business Method Patents Covered Business Method Proceedings Highmark v. Allcare Order to Stay Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Post-Grant Review Salesforce

Federal Circuit to Review Consideration of Induced Infringement at the ITC En Banc

Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has granted en banc review in the case of Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission in order to consider whether...more

6/9/2014 - Induced Infringement ITC Jurisdiction Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents Suprema

Supreme Court: Patent Claims Must Provide “Clear Notice” To What Is Claimed

On June 2, 2014, the unanimous Supreme Court of the United States, in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., a case that focused on the standard for compliance with the “definiteness” requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2,...more

6/5/2014 - Definiteness Indefiniteness Nautilus Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Notice Requirements Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS

It’s Not All that Bleak for Patent Owners at the PTAB

LKQ Corp. v. Clearlamp, LLC; MicroStrategy, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc.; Kyocera Corp. v. Softview LLC - In addition to the many IPRs and CBM reported in this issue, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has now issued...more

5/15/2014 - Covered Business Method Patents Covered Business Method Proceedings Inter Partes Review Proceedings Obviousness Patent Infringement Patent Litigation Patent Trial and Appeal Board Patents Trulia Zillow

52 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 3

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×