Covered Business Method Proceedings

News & Analysis as of

Effect On Settlement Of Post-Grant Patent Review Proceedings

The recent America Invents Act both modified and created procedures for challenging patents in proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) after they have been issued, which are called post grant...more

Institution Decisions for August 12, 2014

Dispositions - In Google Inc. Jongerius Panoramic Technologies, LLC, IPR2013-00191, Paper 70 (August 12, 2014) the Board issued a final written decision that claims –6, 10–15, 17– 19, 21, 23–25, 27, and 28 (all of the...more

PTAB Issues Its First Precedential Opinion in CBM Review Proceeding Litigated by Goodwin Procter

On July 31, 2014, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated as “precedential” its decision in Covered Business Method Review (CBM) proceeding SecureBuy, LLC v. CardinalCommerce Corporation, CBM 2014-00035 (Pat. Tr....more

Board Issues First Precedential Opinion

An ongoing and (surprisingly) often-raised issue in Covered Business Method Reviews has led the Board to issue its first Precedential opinion in an AIA post-grant proceeding. ...more

Motion to Stay Pending CBM Review Granted Where Non-Practicing Entity Did Not Seek Preliminary Injunction

Boku, Inc. ("Boku") filed a CBM petition with the PTAB seeking review of the patentability of Plaintiff's U.S. Patent No. 7,273,168 (the "'168 patent"). The petition challenged all claims of the '168 patent on grounds that...more

Versata v. SAP: PTAB Decision Does Not Trump a Final Jury Verdict

As discussed in an earlier article, the final decision in the first covered business method review (CBM) in SAP America, Inc. v. Versata Data Development Group, PTAB Case CBM2012-00001, presents many issues of first...more

New Guidance From the Federal Circuit on Motions to Stay Litigation Pending a PTAB Proceeding

In VirtualAgility Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc., No. 2014-1232 (July 10, 2014), the Federal Circuit issued its first opinion directed to the issue of when it is appropriate to grant a stay of a district court patent...more

Federal Circuit Orders Stay Pending Completion of CBM Review

Applying section 18(a)(1) of the America Invents Act (AIA) to an issue of first impression, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a district court, ordering a stay of the district court...more

Board Accelerates Covered Business Method Review to Reduce Duplicative Litigation

In Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. v. DataTreasury Corporation, CBM2014-00020, Paper 23 CBM2014-00021, Paper 24 (July 11, 2014...more

Federal Circuit Favors Stay of Litigation Pending CBMR

In Virtualagility Inc. v. Salesforce.com, Inc., [2014-1232] (July 20. 2014), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s denial of a stay of an infringement suit pursuant to AIA § 18(b)(1) pending disposition of a...more

Federal Circuit: Eastern District of Texas Should Have Stayed Litigation Pending USPTO Covered Business Method Review Proceeding

Covered Business Method Review (CBM) proceedings for challenging patents at the USPTO are more attractive than ever now that the Federal Circuit reversed an Eastern District of Texas judge’s denial of a motion to stay pending...more

Liberty Mutual Achieves Total Knockout of Progressive Patents in Series of Post-Grant CBM Proceedings

A recent dispute involving major automobile insurance companies resulted in the invalidation of five patents through the initiation of post-grant Covered Business Method Patent Review proceedings. The dispute demonstrates...more

It’s Not All that Bleak for Patent Owners at the PTAB

LKQ Corp. v. Clearlamp, LLC; MicroStrategy, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc.; Kyocera Corp. v. Softview LLC - In addition to the many IPRs and CBM reported in this issue, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has now issued...more

A Primer On Claim Amendments in Post-Grant Review

Bloomberg Inc. et al. v. Markets-Alert Pty Ltd. - In the final written decision of a covered business method (CBM) review, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) sided with the petitioner, canceling all claims under...more

PTAB Practice Tip: When Must I Request ‘Authorization’ to File a Motion?

One of the most common mistakes parties make in the new Inter Partes Review (IPR) and Covered Business Method (CBM) proceedings is failing to seek Board authorization to file a motion. Many practitioners incorrectly assume...more

Three New Tools to Challenge Patents

Among the most significant changes made by the America Invents Act (AIA) are the provisions that permit a business to challenge a patent at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in litigation-type proceedings, but at a lower...more

PTAB Grants Additional Discovery in Covered Business Method

The AIA provides an opportunity for limited discovery in the new Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post Grant Review (PGR), and Covered Business Methods (CBM) proceedings. The USPTO has set a “good cause” standard for additional...more

Six-Month Report Card: Post-Issuance Proceedings Under the AIA

Introduction - On September 16, 2012, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) implemented the provisions of the America Invents Act (AIA) to provide post-issuance patent challenge options to third parties...more

The Perfect Patent Office Litigator [Video]

In this video, Robert Greene Sterne, a founding director of intellectual property law firm Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C., describes the perfect patent office litigator to handle the new contested proceedings under...more

The Decision Maker's Guide to Contested Proceedings Under the American Invents Act [Video]

Under the America Invents Act, a patent owner has many tools available when considering contested proceedings. Some of those options include inter partes review, covered business method review proceedings, supplemental...more

20 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1