Steven J. Pearlman

Steven J. Pearlman

Proskauer Rose LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › Title VII

Share:

Supreme Court Concludes That EEOC Conciliation Efforts Are Reviewable by Courts

On April 29, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously concluded that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) efforts to conciliate a matter before filing suit—a statutory requirement of Title VII—can be reviewed...more

4/30/2015 - Chevron Deference Conciliation Discrimination EEOC Judicial Review Mach Mining v EEOC SCOTUS Title VII

Sixth Circuit: Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies Not A Jurisdictional Bar For Title VII Retaliation Claim

On August 13, 2013, the Sixth Circuit reinstated a retaliation claim under Title VII, reversing the dismissal of the claim on jurisdictional grounds for failure to exhaust administrative remedies with the EEOC....more

8/27/2013 - Administrative Remedies Civil Rights Act EEOC Jurisdiction Retaliation Title VII Whistleblowers

Fifth Circuit: No Fee Shifting For Title VII Mixed-Motive Retaliation Claims

On April 3, 2013, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas that a plaintiff was not entitled to attorney’s fees and costs under Title VII (42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-5(g))...more

4/18/2013 - Discrimination Fee-Shifting Statutes Harassment Mixed Motive Cases Retaliation Title VII

Supreme Court Asked To Decide If Retaliation Claims Require New Administrative Charge

On January 8, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court was petitioned to rule on whether employees must file a new or amended charge to pursue an employment retaliation claim arising from an initial Title VII discrimination charge....more

2/1/2013 - Discrimination EEOC Gender Discrimination Racial Discrimination Retaliation SCOTUS Split of Authority Termination Title VII

How U.S. Supreme Court Ruling On Title VII Retaliation Standard Case May Affect Claims Under Whistleblower & Other...

“But-for” or “mixed motive” is a causation question not unknown to the U.S. Supreme Court. In Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989), a plurality held that the anti-discrimination provision of Title VII only...more

1/29/2013 - ADEA False Claims Act Mixed Motive Cases Nassar Retaliation SCOTUS Title VII University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Whistleblowers

“Associational Retaliation” Actionable, But Claim Still Booted

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted a company summary judgment on an “associational retaliation” claim brought under Title VII by a temporary worker claiming the company ended her assignments...more

12/28/2012 - Associational Retaliation Discrimination Retaliation Title VII

6 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×