In this issue:

- SEC Issues Risk Alert on Options Trading Used to Evade Short-Sale Requirements

- SEC Order Temporarily Exempting Certain Broker Dealers and Certain Transactions from the Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements of Rule 13H-1

- CFTC Issues Final Rules for SIDCOs

- CFTC Proposes Rules for SIDCOs to Conform to International Standards

- CFTC Adopts Final Harmonization Rules for Registered Investment Company Advisers Required to Register as CPOs Under Regulation 4.5; Also Adopts Changes Applicable to All CPOs

- CME Amends Electronic Audit Trail Requirements

- NFA Reminds SDs and MSPs of Portfolio Reconciliation Requirements

- CFTC Adopts Final Harmonization Rules for Registered Investment Company Advisers Required to Register as CPOs Under Regulation 4.5; Also Adopts Changes Applicable to All CPOs

- Matria Healthcare Insider Traders Will Go to Trial

- Securities Fraud Claims Against CommScope Dismissed

- Court Finds Private Equity Portfolio Company May Have Liability for Withdrawal by Another Portfolio Company

- Excerpt from: Matria Healthcare Insider Traders Will Go to Trial:

The US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia denied a motion for partial summary judgment in the Security and Exchange Commission’s insider trading case against Earl Arrowood and Parker Petit. The SEC alleges that Arrowood purchased shares of Matria Healthcare after receiving non-public information from Petit—Matria’s then-CEO—regarding a potential merger. Petit moved for partial summary judgment on two grounds: that the SEC lacked circumstantial evidence of communications between Arrowood and Petit, and that the timing of Arrowood’s trade predated serious merger discussions between Matria and Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc. by two months. The district court rejected both arguments and denied the motion, finding that the SEC’s allegations of (i) a close personal relationship between the defendants, (ii) frequent communications between them around the time of the trade, (iii) possible inconsistencies in the deposition testimony of Arrowood and his wife and (iv) Petit’s involvement in Arrowood’s trading management cumulatively were sufficient to survive summary judgment. Moreover, the court found that non-public information regarding the possibility of a merger, even if not concrete about when and with whom such a merger would occur, could be material.

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.