In This Issue:

- U.S. Supreme Court Issues Two Important Decisions Under Title VII

- Supreme Court Holds Lone Plaintiff’s FLSA Collective Action Is Moot When Claims Are Resolved Before Certification

- Supreme Court Allows Class Arbitration Despite No Express Agreement

- Second Circuit Adopts EEOC Negligence Standard Regarding Non-Employee Harassment

- Eleventh Circuit Finds That Undocumented Workers Can Pursue FLSA Claims

- NYC Human Rights Law Extended to Prohibit Discrimination Against the Unemployed

- California Appeals Court Rules That Oral Disclosure Can Constitute an Invasion of Privacy

- Employers Must Use Revised Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9

- Senate Passes Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill

- Excerpt from - California Appeals Court Rules That Oral Disclosure Can Constitute an Invasion of Privacy:

On March 18, 2013, a California Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s dismissal of a violation of privacy suit in Ignat v. Yum! Brands, Inc., 214 Cal. App. 4th 808 (2013), and held that an individual’s right to privacy can be violated by oral, as well as written, communications.

Please see full Memorandum below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

CONNECT

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP and Affiliates offers clients around the globe solutions to... View Profile »


Follow Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP: