High Times in the Insurance Industry: Colorado Federal Court Considers Coverage for Medical Marijuana Business -
Why it matters: With legalized marijuana businesses booming, a new decision from a Colorado federal court...more
3/21/2016
/ Claims Made Policy ,
Co-Insurance Payments ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Duty to Defend ,
Farms ,
Food Safety ,
Fraud ,
Indemnification Clauses ,
Innocent Insured ,
Insurance Industry ,
Late Notices ,
Malpractice Insurance ,
Marijuana Related Businesses ,
Pesticides ,
Prejudice ,
Rescission
Exception to Mold Exclusion Requires Defense of Suit Alleging Injuries From Moldy Water -
Why it matters: An exclusion for "Fungi or Bacteria" did not prevent a federal court judge in Tennessee from ordering an insurer...more
9/10/2015
/ Ambiguous ,
Breach of Duty ,
Choice-of-Law ,
Claims Made Policy ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Duty to Defend ,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) ,
Insurance Contracts ,
Insurance Industry ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insureds ,
Mold Litigation ,
Notice Requirements ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Reservation of Rights
Two Years, Too Long for Coverage Under Claims-Made-and-Reported Policy -
Why it matters: Claims-made-and-reported policies require that the claim be both made against the insured and reported to the insurer within the...more
8/1/2015
/ Claims Made Policy ,
Delay Claims ,
Dismissals ,
Duty to Defend ,
Excess Policies ,
Fire Damage ,
Late Notices ,
Malpractice Insurance ,
Motion To Intervene ,
Notice Requirements ,
Property Damage ,
Property Insurance
California Appellate Court: All Claims “Arising From” Ponzi Scheme Are Precluded -
Why it matters: Concluding that any claims related to a Ponzi scheme—even if they involved different investors, investments, or...more
5/7/2015
/ Appeals ,
Arbitration ,
Broker-Dealer ,
Claims Made Policy ,
Class Action ,
D&O Insurance ,
GA Supreme Court ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Investment Adviser ,
Liability Insurance ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Ponzi Scheme ,
Workplace Injury
Legal Issues Not Proper Expert Testimony -
Why it matters: As a good reminder concerning the boundaries for admissibility of expert opinions, a federal court in Texas recently granted a policyholder’s motion to strike an...more
4/4/2015
/ Asbestos ,
Asbestos Litigation ,
Buckyballs ,
Claims Made Policy ,
Duty to Defend ,
Expert Testimony ,
Indemnification ,
Insurance Industry ,
Intellectual Property Litigation ,
Liability Insurance ,
Medical Malpractice ,
Policy Exclusions
California Court Adopts Broad Interpretation of “Occurrence,” Finds Coverage -
Why it matters: In a victory for policyholders—and a continuation of the trend of courts adopting a broad reading of the term “occurrence”...more