Unfair Trade Practices Exclusion Doesn't Cover Consumer Protection Suits -
Why it matters: An unfair trade practices clause did not bar coverage for a policyholder's subsidiary, an Illinois federal court ruled, ordering...more
10/9/2015
/ Anticompetitive Behavior ,
Bad Faith ,
Bargaining Power ,
Breach of Contract ,
Class Action ,
Commercial Insurance Policies ,
Conflicts of Interest ,
Consumer Fraud ,
Cumis Counsel ,
Duty to Defend ,
False Claims Act (FCA) ,
Fraud ,
Insurance Industry ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insureds ,
Legal Ethics ,
Negligent Misrepresentation ,
NV Supreme Court ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Reservation of Rights ,
Subsidiaries ,
The Clayton Act ,
Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices ,
Unjust Enrichment
Exception to Mold Exclusion Requires Defense of Suit Alleging Injuries From Moldy Water -
Why it matters: An exclusion for "Fungi or Bacteria" did not prevent a federal court judge in Tennessee from ordering an insurer...more
9/10/2015
/ Ambiguous ,
Breach of Duty ,
Choice-of-Law ,
Claims Made Policy ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Duty to Defend ,
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) ,
Insurance Contracts ,
Insurance Industry ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insureds ,
Mold Litigation ,
Notice Requirements ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Reservation of Rights
Good News for Corporate Policyholders: Insurer Cannot Refuse Coverage Based on Insured's Assignment of Rights Under Policies After Loss Has Occurred -
Why it matters: Reversing its holding in a 2003 case, the Supreme...more
8/28/2015
/ Abatement ,
Asbestos Litigation ,
Attorney's Fees ,
Bad Faith ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Carbon Emissions ,
CERCLA ,
Clean Air Act ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Consent Decrees ,
Consent to Assignment ,
Cumis Counsel ,
D&O Insurance ,
Duty to Defend ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Environmental Remediation Costs ,
FDIC ,
Fluor ,
Hartford Casualty Ins. ,
Hartford Insurance Company ,
Indemnification ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insureds ,
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company ,
Mitigation ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Receivership
Insured's Notice to Broker Satisfied Policy Requirements, Illinois Court Rules -
Why it matters: An insured's notice to its broker satisfied the policy's notice requirements, an Illinois appellate panel recently...more
8/14/2015
/ Apparent Authority ,
Auto Insurance ,
Bad Faith ,
Breach of Contract ,
Car Accident ,
Carbon Emissions ,
Civil Conspiracy ,
Class Action ,
Cyber Insurance ,
Data Breach ,
Duty to Defend ,
Fraud ,
Insurance Industry ,
Insureds ,
Mediation ,
Notice Requirements ,
Nuclear Waste ,
Patient Privacy Rights ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Public Officials ,
Reservation of Rights ,
Settlement ,
Workplace Injury
California Court: Rejected Demand Within Policy Limits Not Necessary for Bad Faith Claim -
Why it matters: Insurers must proceed with caution when they become aware that a settlement within policy limits is possible,...more
7/16/2015
/ Appeals ,
Bad Faith ,
Breach of Contract ,
CERCLA ,
Commercial General Liability Policies ,
Counterclaims ,
D&O Insurance ,
Declaratory Relief ,
Duty to Defend ,
Duty to Settle ,
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ,
Homeowner's Insurance ,
Homeowners Association (HOA) ,
Insurance Industry ,
Insurance Litigation ,
Insureds ,
Motion to Dismiss ,
Policy Exclusions ,
Policy Limits ,
Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) ,
Scope of Coverage ,
Scope of the Claim ,
Summary Judgment ,
TX Supreme Court
Why it matters -
In the latest decision to weigh in on the scope of the Insured v. Insured exclusion, a California court has held that it is ambiguous as applied to suits brought by the FDIC, and therefore does not...more
Policyholder Entitled to Select Counsel, Even Where Insurer Withdrew Reservation of Rights -
Why it matters:
An insured dissatisfied with counsel selected by its insurer was entitled to select counsel of its...more
California Court Recognizes Named, Additional Insureds Have Different Expectations -
Why it matters:
While the holding sounds straightforward – the reasonable expectations of an additional insured about the...more