In Pa. Office of the Governor v. Brelje, 2024 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 65, at *1 (Commw. Ct. Feb. 23, 2024), the Office of Open Records (“OOR”) concluded that requests for all incoming and outgoing email for two agency employees over...more
Foster v. Pennridge School District, AP 2023-0931 (July 5, 2023). The Office of Open Records determined that a school district properly redacted and withheld certain email chains discussing the school district’s investigation...more
In Weik v. Pennsylvania State Police, AP 2020-1139 (October 6, 2020), the Requester sought records related to a fatal police shooting. The State Police identified a responsive Incident Report, but denied the request, arguing,...more
In an important decision for all law enforcement agencies, the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County quashed a civil subpoena directed to a local police department. The subpoena sought a toxicology report that the...more
In California U. of Pennsylvania v. Bradshaw, 1491 C.D. 2018, 2019 WL 2305947, (Pa. Cmmw. May 31, 2019), the Commonwealth Court affirmed the Office of Open Records’ conclusion that “only the identities of natural persons are...more
When responding to RTKL requests, Open Records Officers biggest concern is inadvertently disclosing information that could put people in danger. While such records are generally exempt from disclosure, it is the agency’s...more
Under the RTKL (Sections 708(b)(12), 708(b)(17), Attorney-Client Privilege/Attorney-Work Product Doctrine) – Responding to Requests.
Requesters, instead of seeking specific records, occasionally ask for a collection of...more