INCEPT LLC v. PALETTE LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
Before Newman, Schall, and Taranto. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: No teaching away when art does not disparage invention and free samples cannot...more
OneSubsea IP UK Limited v. FMC Technologies, Inc.
Before Clevenger, Moore, and Dyk. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Summary: Ordering additional discovery before ultimately...more
MEDTRONIC, INC. v. TELEFLEX INNOVATIONS S.A.R.L.
Before Moore, Lourie, and Dyk. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board -
Summary: Federal Circuit confirms low bar for evidence corroborating prior inventorship...more
5/30/2023
/ Corroboration ,
Evidence ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Inventors ,
Medtronic ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents
CUPP COMPUTING AS v. TREND MICRO INC. [OPINION] -
Before Dyk, Taranto, and Stark. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Patent Owners cannot attempt to narrow claims by disclaiming claim scope during an...more
PROVISUR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. WEBER, INC.
Before Prost, Reyna, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The PTAB has an obligation to ensure that its logic is reasonably discernible from the...more
UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE v. CLEAR-VU LIGHTING LLC -
Before Reyna, Clevenger, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB’s obviousness decision because the...more
IN RE: SURGISIL, L.L.P.
Before Moore, Newman, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A design patent claiming the design of an article of manufacture cannot be anticipated by the design...more
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY V. GAMON PLUS, INC.
Before Moore, Prost, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The standards for establishing a presumption of nexus or a nexus-in-fact between...more
8/23/2021
/ Appeals ,
Campbell Soup Company ,
Design Patent ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Substantial Nexus
CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC v. DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Before Newman, Dyk, and Reyna. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A reference may teach away from modifying a particular embodiment to include...more
MOJAVE DESERT HOLDINGS, LLC v. CROCS, INC.
Before Newman, Dyk, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Parties challenging patents in inter partes reexamination can assign their rights...more
Federal Circuit Summary -
Before Dyk, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A two-dimensional drawing of a three-dimensional object may meet the enablement and definiteness...more
The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s final written decision holding that claims directed to Novartis’s multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya were obvious in Novartis AG v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals. Ltd., No. 2016-1352 (Fed. Cir....more