BLEPHEX, LLC. v. MYCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Before: Moore, Schall, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Eastern District of Michigan.
Summary: Conclusory statements about how a skilled artisan would combine embodiments in a prior...more
UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE v. CLEAR-VU LIGHTING LLC -
Before Reyna, Clevenger, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB’s obviousness decision because the...more
CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY V. GAMON PLUS, INC.
Before Moore, Prost, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The standards for establishing a presumption of nexus or a nexus-in-fact between...more
8/23/2021
/ Appeals ,
Campbell Soup Company ,
Design Patent ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding ,
Obviousness ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent Trial and Appeal Board ,
Patents ,
Prior Art ,
Substantial Nexus
CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC v. DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD.
Before Newman, Dyk, and Reyna. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A reference may teach away from modifying a particular embodiment to include...more
The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s final written decision holding that claims directed to Novartis’s multiple sclerosis drug Gilenya were obvious in Novartis AG v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals. Ltd., No. 2016-1352 (Fed. Cir....more