On May 13, 2022, the Superior Court of California in Los Angeles County held that SB 826, the law requiring companies with headquarters in California to have a prescribed number of women on their boards of directors, is...more
On April 1, 2022, the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in a case challenging the legality of AB 979 under the California Constitution...more
4/5/2022
/ Board of Directors ,
Business Litigation ,
Constitutional Challenges ,
Corporate Counsel ,
Disclosure ,
Diversity and Inclusion Standards (D&I) ,
Governor Newsom ,
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) ,
LGBTQ ,
Motion for Summary Judgment ,
Municipalities ,
Publicly-Traded Companies ,
Regulatory Agenda ,
Rulemaking Process ,
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ,
Shareholders ,
State and Local Government ,
State Constitutions
On September 20, 2021, the Delaware Supreme Court took the highly unusual step of overruling its prior decision in Gentile v. Rossette. An oft-criticized precedent from 2006, Gentile created an exception allowing minority...more
9/24/2021
/ Appeals ,
Carve Out Provisions ,
Controlling Stockholders ,
Corporate Counsel ,
DE Supreme Court ,
Derivative Tort Claims ,
Dilution ,
Fiduciary Duty ,
Mergers ,
Minority Shareholders ,
Shareholder Litigation
On December 22, 2020, in litigation between WeWork and the Softbank Group, the Delaware Court of Chancery determined that the Softbank Group must hand over several dozen otherwise privileged emails because two SoftBank...more
A new decision makes clear that parties should no longer expect the Delaware Court of Chancery to approve broad settlements of M&A class actions based on supplemental proxy disclosures. Chancellor Andre Bouchard issued a...more