News & Analysis as of

State Constitutions

Holland & Knight LLP

Alaska Court Strikes Down Entertainment Restrictions for Breweries and Wineries

Holland & Knight LLP on

An Alaska trial court has struck down key portions of Senate Bill 9 that restricted breweries and wineries from hosting live music, entertainment and most non‑product‑focused activities. In Zip Kombucha LLC v. Richard,...more

Holland & Knight LLP

What to Watch for as Washington State Crafts a Millionaire's Tax

Holland & Knight LLP on

Entering 2026, Washington joins the growing list of states looking to implement new taxes on the "rich" – those earning more than $1 million per year. In December 2025, Gov. Bob Ferguson signaled his approval for a new 9.9...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

State v. Johnson: Wyoming Supreme Court Overturns Abortion Restrictions—The Footnotes Tell the Real Story

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Wyoming Supreme Court began the year 2026 with a landmark decision in State v. Johnson, 2026 WY 1, delivering a ruling with implications that extend far beyond its immediate outcome. While headlines will focus on the...more

Fisher Phillips

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds No Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Internet Search Activity: Key Takeaways for Employers

Fisher Phillips on

A recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling could have broad implications for internet privacy, and employers should take note. The state’s high court ruled in December that individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of...more

Sullivan & Worcester

148 State Street Owner Sues City of Boston for Retaliatory Property Tax Assessments

Sullivan & Worcester on

Pioneer New England Legal Foundation (the Legal Foundation) and Sullivan & Worcester LLP today filed on behalf of their client 148 State Street a class action lawsuit against the City of Boston, alleging that the Assessor's...more

Lathrop GPM

Let the Sunshine In - MO Supreme Court Rolls Back Witness Redaction Rules

Lathrop GPM on

On December 16, the Missouri Supreme Court announced new rules dramatically restricting when court papers may be redacted. The new rules effectively undo a set of rules from 2023 that required the names of “witnesses” to be...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Arizona's Judicial Retention Elections

Snell & Wilmer on

The Arizona Supreme Court unanimously upheld, in Knight v. Fontes, the constitutionality of Arizona’s judicial retention election scheme for the Arizona Court of Appeals, rejecting challenges under the Arizona Constitution’s...more

Fisher Phillips

Court Tosses Most Claims in Healthcare Pixel Privacy Suit, Ruling That Website Visits Don’t Reveal PHI: What Your Business Should...

Fisher Phillips on

A California federal court recently handed healthcare businesses another victory in the ongoing wave of privacy lawsuits targeting website analytics and tracking tools. A California federal judge ruled on November 21 that...more

Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak

Challenge to Mandatory Retirement Age for New York Judges Rejected

On November 24, 2025, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Lyle Frank denied a request by state court judges to invalidate New York State’s mandatory retirement age for judges.  The plaintiffs are all sitting Justices of the New...more

Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP

Common Pleas Court Addresses Environmental Group Challenges to Ohio House Bill 507

In Ohio Environmental Council v. State of Ohio, Case No. 23-CV-002403, the court of common pleas of Franklin County, Ohio addressed certain claims brought by environmental groups seeking to challenge the state land leasing...more

Holland & Knight LLP

California Courts Reemphasize That State Housing Laws Prevail Over City Codes

Holland & Knight LLP on

As state laws increasingly limit local government authority over housing production, cities and housing opponents have sought refuge in provisions of the California Constitution that give "charter cities" – cities that have...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Proposed Constitutional Amendment: Arkansas Attorney General Rejects Clean and Healthy Natural Environment Amendment

Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin transmitted a November 4th letter (Opinion No. 2025-110) to Jennifer Waymack Standerfer rejecting a popular name and ballot title for a proposed Arkansas constitutional amendment titled: ...more

Freeman Mathis & Gary

Vertical stare decisis: Can a District Court of Appeal overrule Florida Supreme Court precedent?

Freeman Mathis & Gary on

The First District Court of Appeal recently struck down a Florida law that prohibited people from openly carrying firearms in public. The court held that section 790.053 violated the Second Amendment as applied to the states...more

Cozen O'Connor

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Sides with Athletes, Declares ‘Jock Tax’ Unconstitutional

Cozen O'Connor on

In a nearly unanimous decision, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the City of Pittsburgh’s (City) 3% tax on income earned by City nonresidents while performing at one of its publicly funded sports stadiums, the...more

Williams Mullen

Virginia General Assembly Calls Surprise Special Session on Redistricting

Williams Mullen on

The Virginia General Assembly will convene a Special Session this week to take up redistricting. This follows similar efforts in states like North Carolina, Texas, and California. ...more

Blank Rome LLP

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Confirms That Pittsburgh’s Tax on Only Nonresident Athletes and Entertainers Violates Commonwealth’s...

Blank Rome LLP on

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has affirmed the Commonwealth Court and ruled that Pittsburgh’s Non-Resident Sports Facility Usage Fee (“Facility Fee”) unconstitutionally discriminates against nonresidents in violation of...more

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Health Care Providers in North Carolina Remain Protected by Damages Cap

Through a statute enacted over a decade ago, North Carolina law limits medical-malpractice defendants’ liability for noneconomic damages (such as pain and suffering) to a statutory maximum. The limit applies unless the...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Game-Changer: Pittsburgh’s ‘Jock Tax’ Struck Down by PA High Court

On September 25, 2025, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania struck down the City of Pittsburgh’s 3 percent tax on income earned by nonresident athletes while playing in one of Pittsburgh’s publicly funded sports stadiums,...more

Benesch

Why Ohio’s Congressional Redistricting is Still in the Headlines

Benesch on

Legislative redistricting has sparked fierce partisan battles across the country for hundreds of years. It seems that after every census, Republicans and Democrats engage in a tug-of-war, looking to cement an advantage for...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

Service to Former Address Not Enough, Ohio Supreme Court Rules

In Hunt v. Alderman, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that service of a complaint by certified mail to a defendant’s former address fails both the requirements of Ohio Civil Rule 4.1(A)(1)(a) and the due process requirement...more

Kerr Russell

Michigan Supreme Court Declines to Revisit Medical Malpractice Damages Cap

Kerr Russell on

The Michigan Supreme Court recently declined to weigh in on an important question about whether the state’s cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits violates the Michigan Constitution. (In re Certified...more

Snell & Wilmer

Arizona Supreme Court Affirms Citizens’ Broad Rights to Propose Local Ballot Measures

Snell & Wilmer on

The Arizona Supreme Court recently held in Roundtree v. City of Page that the circumstances under which citizens can place a local initiative measure on the ballot are very broad, so long as they propose something that may be...more

Roetzel & Andress

Ohio Court Affirms Eminent Domain Taking for Downtown Zanesville Redevelopment Project

Roetzel & Andress on

The Ohio and U.S. Constitutions require that the power of eminent domain can only be exercised when necessary for a public use. In the 2005 case of Kelo v. City of New London, the U.S. Supreme Court took an expansive view...more

Best Best & Krieger LLP

The Price of Water Just Got More Complicated: San Diego’s Legal Battle Over Tiered Rates

On July 30, 2025, a divided California Court of Appeal issued its long-awaited opinion in Patz v. City of San Diego, affirming the trial court’s judgment that the City’s tiered residential water rates violated Proposition 218...more

Oliva Gibbs

A river ran through it: State v. Riemer and what happens to the mineral rights when the water runs dry

Oliva Gibbs on

Lake Meredith is a reservoir located about 30 miles northeast of Amarillo in the Texas Panhandle. It was formed when the State of Texas built the Sanford Dam on the Canadian River in 1965. When the dam was completed the...more

577 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 24

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide