Latest Posts › Section 101

Share:

Epic Tech, LLC v. Fusion Skill, Inc. (S.D. Tex. 2021)

Electronic Gaming Patents Found Invalid under § 101 - In the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Houston Division), Plaintiff Epic Tech, LLC (a seller of so-called "sweepstakes games") sued...more

In re Rudy (Fed. Cir. 2020)

Claims Directed to Selecting Fishing Hooks for Use Are Not Patentable - Christopher John Rudy, represented pro se, appealed from a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") affirming the rejection of claims...more

Ex parte Smith (PTAB 2019)

Software Claims Survive Section 101 Challenge and Are Found to Be Directed to Patent-Eligible Subject Matter - In the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently designated its...more

In re Eberra (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Purely Business Method Patent Found Ineligible under Section 101 - In an appeal from a rejection in initial examination of appellant Mark Eberra's patent application, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and...more

Broadsoft, Inc. v. Callwave Communications, LLC (D. Del. 2017)

Telephone Call Processing Patent Claims Found Invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 - In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiff filed a declaratory judgment action on seeking a declaration that...more

Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Polar Electro Oy (D. Utah 2017)

Claims Lacking Details Found to be Directed to Patent-Ineligible Subject Matter - In the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah (Central Division), Polar filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings contending that...more

Integrated Technological Systems, Inc. v. First Internet Bank of Indiana (E.D. Tex.)

Business Method / Software Patent Invalidated for Claiming Ineligible Subject Matter - In the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Integrated Technological Systems, Inc. (ITS) sued First Internet Bank...more

Speedtrack Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2017)

File-Searching Software Patent Found to be Patent Eligible - Speedtrack sued Amazon for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,544,360 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. ...more

Tranxition, Inc. v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Federal Circuit Finds Another Software Patent Invalid under Section 101 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a recent non-precedential decision in a case captioned Tranxition, Inc. v. Lenovo (United...more

Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2016)

Message Exchange Patent Held Invalid under Section 101 - Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC ("MTel") sued United Parcel Service, Inc. ("UPS") in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for...more

Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC (PTAB 2016)

Sally Beauty (Petitioner) filed a Petition requesting a review under the transitional program for covered business method (CBM) patents of U.S. Patent No. 5,969,324, owned by Intellectual Ventures I LLC (IV)....more

Appistry, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (W.D. Wash. 2016)

Last month, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Defendant Amazon.com's Motion to Dismiss for Invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101 on the grounds that the two patents asserted by Plaintiff...more

Life Technologies Corporation v. Unisone Strategic IP, Inc. (PTAB 2016)

Life Technologies Corp. filed a petition requesting covered business method (CBM) patent review of a number of claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,996,538. The PTAB determined that the claims are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101...more

LendingTree, LLC v. Zillow, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2016) - Claims of Another "Loan Application" Patent Invalidated under Section 101

In a nonprecedential opinion issued earlier today, the Federal Circuit invalidated claims under 35 U.S.C. § 101 that had survived the District Court in LendingTree, LLC, v. Zillow, Inc., Nextag, Inc., & Adchemy, Inc. This...more

BASCOM Global Internet Services, Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC (Fed. Cir. 2016) - Federal Circuit Concurrence -- Decide Patentability...

The Federal Circuit earlier today vacated a District Court's order dismissing BASCOM's complaint and remanded for further proceedings. BASCOM sued AT&T Inc. for patent infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,987,606, and the U.S....more

Femto-Sec Tech, Inc. v. Lensar, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2016)

Patent Having Claims That Apply Law of Nature Is Patent-Eligible - On June 8, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California issued an order denying a motion to dismiss, and found that U.S. Patent...more

Avago Technologies General IP (Singapore) Pte Ltd. v. Asustek Computer, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2016)

"Quick Look Test" Used by District Court to Support Lack of Preemption and Find Software Claims Patent Eligible - On April 15, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an Order Denying...more

Treehouse Avatar LLC v. Valve Corp. (D.C. Del. 2016)

U.S. Patent to Consumer Marketing, Based on Avatar Choices, Survives § 101 Challenge - On March 22, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware issued a Memorandum Opinion in a case captioned Treehouse...more

Motorola Mobility, LLC, v. Intellectual Ventures I, LLC (PTAB 2016)

After Multiple CBM Petitions, Motorola Invalidates Software Patent - On March 21, 2016, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a final written decision in the Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review...more

Square, Inc. v. Protegrity Corp. (PTAB 2016)

U.S. Patent to Database for Protecting Formula for Coca-Cola Found Invalid under CBM Review - On March 2, 2016, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a final written decision in the Covered Business...more

Subject Matter Eligibility in the Information Age

By Joseph Herndon -- The test for what is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in the United States has become quite difficult to understand.  In Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the Supreme Court provided a two-step test...more

Gonzalez v. Infostream Group, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2016)

Producing "digital labels" is Patent Eligible under § 101 - On February 6, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (Marshall Division) issued a decision in a case captioned Gonzalez v. Infostream...more

Genband US LLC v. Metaswitch Networks Corp. (E.D. Tex. 2016)

Genband US LLC sued Metaswitch for infringement of claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,772,210 ("the '210 Patent") and U.S. Patent No 7,047,561 ("the '561 Patent") in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas...more

Recognicorp, LLC v. Nintendo Co. (W.D. Wash. 2015)

Generic Software Claims Found Ineligible under § 101 - A common theme found in recent patent litigation is that software claims lacking detail are more likely to be found invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The U.S....more

01 Communique Laboratory, Inc. vs. Citrix Systems, Inc., (N.D. Ohio 2015)

Patent Eligibility Requires Consideration of the Claim as a Whole - The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Eastern Division) issued an opinion on December 21, 2015 in the case captioned 01 Communique...more

26 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide