News & Analysis as of

Coca Cola

Your Daily Dose of Financial News

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Heath insurance behemoth Cigna has agreed to buy Express Scripts—a “pharmacy benefits manger”—for $67 billion in cash and stock, including assuming $15 billion of its debt. The merger is one of a series of big moves in the...more

Automated Tracking Solutions, LLC v. The Coca-Cola Company

Automated Tracking Solutions, LLC, (“ATS”) appealed findings of invalidity for failing to claim patent-eligible subject matter by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. In a decision rendered...more

Notable Ruling: A Swift Win For Coca-Cola In Becerra V. Coca-Cola (N.D. Cal.)

by Perkins Coie on

In yet another Rule 12 decision tied to the “reasonable consumer” standard, Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California dismissed a putative class action against Coca-Cola challenging the name “Diet Coke” as...more

Minimizing Risks Associated With Patent Subject Matter Eligibility

by LeClairRyan on

The Federal Circuit recently issued a trio of decisions relating to early motions seeking dismissal under 35 U.S.C. § 101 based on subject matter eligibility under the Supreme Court’s Alice decision. ...more

Europe: Double victory for Coca-Cola – General Court stops free-riding from outside EU

by Hogan Lovells on

Judgment of 7 December 2017 in Case T-61/16 – The Coca-Cola Company v. EUIPO / Modern Industrial & Trading Investment Co. Ltd (Mitico)) - The General Court confirms that actual commercial use of an EUTM application can...more

Defending Data-Breach Lawsuits Brought By Employees (Part 2 of 2)

by Ellis & Winters LLP on

Yesterday’s post examined Sackin v. TransPerfect, Inc., where an employer suffered a data breach involving its employees’ sensitive information. After the employees sued, a federal court in New York refused to dismiss claims...more

Supreme Court Denies Review of Rules That Vending Machines Are Not Places of Public Accommodation

by Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court declines to review a Fifth Circuit decision stating that a public accommodation covered by Title III of the ADA has to be a physical place and vending machines are not sales...more

Justice Department Says Vending Machines Are Not Places Of Public Accommodation—And So Much More

by Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: In amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court, the Justice Department agreed with the Fifth Circuit and defendant Coca-Cola that a vending machine is not a place of public accommodation and that public...more

Ninth Circuit Reconsiders, Nixes Deceptive Labeling Claim Against Gerber

by Bryan Cave on

Baby food maker Gerber has scored a partial victory in a false labeling would be class action. The Ninth Circuit in Bruton v. Gerber Prods. Co., Case No. 15-15174, has reversed itself and thrown out a deceptive labeling claim...more

Your Daily Dose of Financial News

by Robins Kaplan LLP on

Klaus Kleinfeld is out as CEO of Alcoa-subsidiary Arconic. Kleinfeld’s two-year tenure was marked by problems, and Kleinfeld did himself no favor with an un-Board-authorized letter that he sent to activist-investor Elliott...more

Coca-Cola Dodges Privacy Class Action

by Cozen O'Connor on

Coca-Cola won big last month when it secured summary judgment in a privacy class action brought by a former bottling plant employee concerning compromised personal information. Hon. Joseph Leeson of the Eastern District of...more

Food for Thought: A Review of 2016 Litigation

by Carlton Fields on

Food for Thought is a review of significant court decisions affecting the food, beverage, dietary supplements and personal care products industry. Although many cases in this edition focus on class certification, others...more

Deceptive Marketing — Is Coca-Cola taking a page book from the tobacco industry?

Coca-Cola has been called out in California for deceptively advertising is sugar-saturated sodas so it can sell more of them. A 39-page lawsuit filed in San Francisco makes 13 claims against the iconic beverage brand...more

Food and Beverage Manufacturers That Use Added Sugar Be On Alert

by Womble Bond Dickinson on

The public health community has been more vocal over the last several years regarding the amount of sugar being used in food and beverages. On January 4, 2017, the Praxis Project (“Plaintiff”), a public health advocacy...more

The Zero Sum Game In The Cola Wars

by Ladas & Parry LLP on

In Royal Crown Company and Dr Pepper/Seven Up Inc v The Coca-Cola Company, Opposition 91178927, each party opposed the other’s trademark applications containing the term ZERO for soft drinks, sports drinks and energy drinks....more

Can Starbucks Tolerate Cannabis Parody?

A couple of weeks back, I captured this image from a t-shirt for sale in Starbucks’ backyard — at a shop in the Pike Place Market area of Seattle...more

Realizing Value from Intellectual Property

by McAfee & Taft on

Everyone assumes that intellectual property has value, but how do you determine that value? Can you increase it, and can you damage it?...more

Trademark Review | June 2016

by Knobbe Martens on

Coca-Cola has Acquired Secondary Meaning in ZERO for Colas - In an opposition proceeding before the TTAB, Royal Crown (RC) and Dr. Pepper/Seven Up sought to prevent registration of seventeen applications filed by...more

Fighting Over “Nothing”: The Trademark Battle Over Zero

by Ladas & Parry LLP on

Several big beverage makers recently took each other on in a consolidated proceeding before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). In the case of Royal Crown...more

Recordkeeping Non-Compliance Will Cost You—the EEOC Settles its Sex Discrimination Case Against Coca-Cola Bottling of Mobile

We posted in October 2015 about the EEOC filing suit against Coca-Cola Bottling of Mobile, asserting sex discrimination in violation of Title VII’s record retention provisions. The complaint alleged that in June 2010 Martina...more

Parental Leave Precautions

by Sherman & Howard L.L.C. on

Last week, Coca-Cola announced that many new parents at the company (domestic non-bargaining employees) will soon be eligible for six weeks of paid leave. The benefits, which supplement existing short-term disability benefits...more

Yet Another Trademark Based on My?

Love the new bold look of the Mello Yello can, and it’s hard to miss the prominent abbreviation to MY, along with the trademark assertion: This is My World. Actually, as we have written before, there are more than a few...more

POM Wonderful LLC v. Coca Cola Co.: legal battle nearly over, but industry litigation landscape forever changed…

by Cozen O'Connor on

On March 18, 2016, Pom Wonderful LLC made closing arguments in its trial against Coca-Cola for the alleged misleading marketing of a pomegranate-blueberry juice which contained only trace amounts of either pomegranate or...more

Square, Inc. v. Protegrity Corp. (PTAB 2016)

U.S. Patent to Database for Protecting Formula for Coca-Cola Found Invalid under CBM Review - On March 2, 2016, the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a final written decision in the Covered Business...more

Jury Finds in Favor of Coca-Cola in POM False Advertising Suit

by Freeborn & Peters LLP on

UPDATE: The jury found in favor of Coca-Cola and against POM Wonderful in the trial over whether Coca-Cola misled consumers into believing that Coke’s “Minute Maid Enhanced Pomegranate Blueberry Flavored 100% Blend”...more

110 Results
View per page
Page: of 5

"My best business intelligence,
in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.