Latest Publications

Share:

Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. (2026)

In a decision that, in retrospect, is not surprising (in view of the haste with which the Court took up the case after granting certiorari; see “Solicitor General Proves Persuasive; Supreme Court Grants Hikma’s...more

Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2026)

The measurement of the hydrogen ion concentration in an aqueous solution is represented (on a logarithmic scale) as the pH, wherein water under ambient conditions (a temperature of 25°C) has a neutral pH of 7 and the solution...more

United States Files Statement of Interest in Patent Infringement Proceedings

The United States recently filed a Statement by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 517 regarding the “Interests of United States in pending suits” in Corteva Agriscience...more

Supreme Court Oral Argument in Hikma v. Amarin

On April 27, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Hikma  v. Amarin, with Charles Klein, representing Hikma, Michael Huston representing Amarin, and Malcolm Stewart addressing the Court on behalf of the Government....more

Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. v. Safe Foods Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2026)

While the Supreme Court established a rather definitive standard (“reasonable certainty by a person having ordinary skill in the art”) for determining indefiniteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig...more

Hikma v. Amarin: The Amici Speak – Part III

In addition to the briefs from the parties, seventeen amicus briefs were filed with the Supreme Court in Hikma v. Amarin: six in favor of Petitioner Hikma, seven in favor of Respondent Amarin, and the remaining five on behalf...more

Hikma v. Amarin: The Amici Speak – Part II

In addition to the briefs from the parties, seventeen amicus briefs were filed with the Supreme Court in Hikma v. Amarin: six in favor of Petitioner Hikma, seven in favor of Respondent Amarin, and the remaining five on behalf...more

Hikma v. Amarin: The Amici Speak – Part I

In addition to the briefs from the parties, seventeen amicus briefs were filed with the Supreme Court in Hikma v. Amarin: six in favor of Petitioner Hikma, seven in favor of Respondent Amarin, and the remaining five on behalf...more

Hikma v. Amarin at the Supreme Court: The Parties’ Opening Briefs – Part II

In recent years, the Federal Circuit has, with varying levels of agreement, considered what behavior by generic drugmakers constitutes inducement of infringement regarding so-called “off-label” prescribing for indications not...more

Retired Judges File Amicus Brief in Support of Judge Newman

A distinguished groups of retired judges* filed an amicus brief supporting Judge Pauline Newman’s Petition for Certiorari over the unwillingness of the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to rule on her complaint regarding...more

Hikma v. Amarin at the Supreme Court: The Parties’ Opening Briefs

In recent years, the Federal Circuit has, with varying levels of agreement, considered what behavior by generic drugmakers constitutes inducement of infringement regarding so-called “off-label” prescribing for indications not...more

Teva Pharmaceuticals International v. Eli Lilly & Co. (Fed. Cir. 2026)

The Federal Circuit reversed a District Court grant of judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) that overturned a jury verdict that defendant Eli Lilly had not satisfied the clear-and-convincing-evidence standard in challenging on...more

Reasons for the PTAB’s Priority Determination in Broad’s Favor (Perhaps)

The alacrity with which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) came to the same conclusion in its latest priority determination in favor of the Senior Party in interference No. 106,115 that it had almost eleven months ago...more

PTAB (Again) Awards Priority of Invention to Broad in Interference No. 106,115

On March 26, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, without holding an oral hearing and despite a rather sharply worded opinion by the Federal Circuit vacating and remanding its earlier priority decision (see “Regents of the...more

Judicial Conduct and Disability Committee Has Its Say, Denies Judge Newman’s Latest Request for Review – Patent Docs

The course of the proceedings involving the attempts to remove Judge Pauline Newman from the Federal Circuit is long, and in many senses tragic (see links below).  Just when you might think the last Act has begun (see “Judge...more

Parties File Supplemental Priority Statements in CRISPR Interference

The Parties – Senior Party Broad Institute, Harvard University, and MIT (collectively, “Broad”) and Junior Party Regents of the University of California, Berkeley; University of Vienna; and Emmanuelle Charpentier...more

Meanwhile, Back at the PTAB with CRISPR – Update

Neither the Parties nor the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) have been resting in addressing the decision by the Federal Circuit that vacated and remanded the Board’s decision awarding priority in Interference No. 106,115...more

Judge Newman Seeks Recourse from Supreme Court

The course of the proceedings involving the attempts to remove Judge Pauline Newman from the Federal Circuit is long and in many senses tragic (see links below).  Last week the latest, and likely last, Act of this sad drama...more

Quo Vadis mRNA Vaccine Technology? The State of the IP Lawsuits

One of the beneficial characteristics of the response to the COVID -19 pandemic were pledges from companies involved in developing vaccines (such as Moderna, Pfizer, BioNTech, and others) not to enforce patents on relevant...more

Moderna Settles Patent Litigation with Arbutus et al.

A consequence of the gradual decline in COVID infections worldwide has been a less gradual increase in patent litigation by the many entities having patent rights for the vaccines or components of them.  This is particularly...more

BioNTech Sues Moderna over mRNA Vaccine Technology

One of the paradoxically beneficial consequences of the COVID pandemic was that even without the compulsory aspects of the vaccine patent waiver proposed by certain WTO member states (Brazil, India, and South Africa in...more

REGENEXBIO Inc. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2026)

A consequence of the Supreme Court’s assault on subject matter eligibility a dozen years or so ago was that the patent defense bar presented the judiciary with ever more stringent standards and extreme if not fanciful...more

Bayer Files Suit Against Trio of COVID-19 Vaccine Makers

One of the characteristics of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic were the pledges from companies involved in developing vaccines (such as Moderna, Pfizer, BioNTech, and others) not to enforce patents on relevant technology...more

Allen v. Cooper (4th Cir. 2026)

Dickens’s Bleak House has long stood as an exemplar for the perils of interminable litigation where no one benefits (except, perhaps, the lawyers; see Jarndyce v. Jarndyce). In a case already somewhat notorious for its...more

Supreme Court to Resolve Dispute Over Marketing of “Skinny Labeled” Generics

The Hatch-Waxman Act has always represented a delicate balance between the interests of innovator and generic drugmakers: innovators seek to maintain exclusivity as broadly and long as possible, generics seek to come to...more

1,053 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 43

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide