Latest Posts › SCOTUS

Share:

Supreme Court: PTO Not Entitled to Attorney’s Fees in District Court Appeals

In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Sotomayor, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) is not entitled to recover its attorney’s fees in an appeal to a district court...more

SCOTUS Rules PTO Not Entitled to Attorney’s Fees in Appeals to E.D. Virginia from Adverse PTAB Decisions

On December 11, the US Supreme Court held that the US Patent and Trademark Office is not entitled to recover its attorney’s fees in an appeal to the Eastern District of Virgina from an adverse decision of the Patent Trial and...more

Supreme Court Addresses Effects of Trademark License Rejection in Bankruptcy

In an 8–1 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and held that rejection of a trademark license in bankruptcy constitutes a breach of the license agreement,...more

US Supreme Court | Rejection Of A Trademark License In Bankruptcy Is A Breach Of Contract That Does Not Terminate The Licensee’s...

The US Supreme Court held that under 11 U.S.C. § 365, a debtor’s rejection of an executory contract in bankruptcy has the same effect as a breach outside bankruptcy. The rejection does not rescind rights that the contract...more

Supreme Court to Address Whether Applicant Must Pay PTO “Personnel Expenses”

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Director Iancu’s petition for a writ of certiorari to determine whether a party that files an appeal in the Eastern District of Virginia...more

US Supreme Court Knocks out the Equitable Defense of Laches in Patent Law

The Supreme Court of the United States in SCA Hygiene Prods. Aktiebolag, et al. v. First Quality Baby Prods., LLC, et al., has held that the equitable defense of laches is no longer a valid defense to patent damages claims...more

Good Faith Belief in Invalidity No Defense to Active Inducement

The U.S. Supreme Court (Justice Kennedy writing for the majority) has now eliminated a defense that has been available to parties accused of actively inducing patent infringement under 35 USC § 271(b). The Court held that a...more

Supreme Court on Evaluation of Claims to Computer-Implemented Inventions under 35 U.S.C. § 101

On June 19, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much anticipated decision in Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International et al., confirming that computer-implemented inventions, such as computer...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide