Latest Posts › Patents

Share:

Federal Circuit affirms district court finding of no induced or contributory infringement of generic depression drug

In H. Lundbeck A-S v. Lupin Ltd., Case No. 2022-1194 (Fed. Circ. December 7, 2023), Plaintiffs, H. Lundbeck A/S (“Lundbeck”) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals...more

SCOTUS denies cert in skinny label appeal from the Federal Circuit

On May 15, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States denied Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.’s (“Teva”) petition for certiorari in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, ending a nearly nine-year court...more

PTAB decision invalidating claims as obvious based on analogous art reversed by Federal Circuit

Procedural History - Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GMBH v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. is an appeal from a final written decision in an inter partes proceeding (“IPR”) of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) that found...more

United States Supreme Court affirms invalidating claims for lack of enablement

Executive Summary - In Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts’ judgment that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,829,165 (“the ’165 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 8,859,741 (“the...more

District Court Invalidation of Parkinson's Drug Patent as Obvious Affirmed by Federal Circuit

Procedural History - UCB, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc., is an appeal from a judgment in a Hatch-Waxman suit in the District of Delaware that found the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,130,589 (the “’589...more

PTAB decision invalidating claims as inherently anticipated upheld by Federal Circuit

Procedural History - Arbutus Biopharma Corp. v. Modernatx, Inc. is an appeal from a final written decision in an inter partes proceeding of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) that found claims 1-22 of U.S. Patent...more

PTAB Decision Invalidating Claims Finding Lack of Written Description and Later Priority Date Upheld by Federal Circuit

Procedural History - Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., Case No. 2021-2168 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2023) is an appeal by the Regents of the University of Minnesota (“Minnesota”) from a final...more

Federal Circuit Upholds Judgment Delisting System Patent From Orange Book

Procedural History - Jazz Pharms., Inc., v. Avadel CNS Pharms., LLC, Case No. 2023-1186 (Fed. Cir. February 24, 2023) is an appeal by Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Jazz) from a District of Delaware order granting a motion...more

Federal Circuit Holds Surgical Patent Anticipated Under Pre-AIA 35 USC102b Public Use

This is an appeal from a District of Delaware summary judgment order that held that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,186,208 (the ’208 Patent) are anticipated under the public use bar of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). ...more

Fed. Circuit Says Isolated Milk Nutrient Not Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

Procedural History - This is an appeal from a District of Delaware summary judgement order that held that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,197,807 (the ‘807 Patent), entitled “Nicotinamide riboside kinase...more

Webinar: Orange Book listing sheets under the microscope [Video]

Preparing the Orange Book listing sheet (i.e., Form FDA 3542) for a U.S. patent is more than just checking the boxes. Generic drug companies have recently argued that statements made in those listing sheets could be used to...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide