News & Analysis as of

Amgen

Goodwin

Amgen Files BPCIA Complaints Against Dr. Reddy’s/Alvotech and Amneal Regarding Denosumab Biosimilars

Goodwin on

On November 6, 2025, Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) launched a new round of BPCIA denosumab litigations when it filed two cases in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, one against Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories (“Dr....more

Venable LLP

PTAB Grants Amgen’s Request for Adverse Judgment Prior to Institution of Trial in Opdivo® IPR2025-00603

Venable LLP on

On October 1, 2025, the PTAB granted Amgen’s request for adverse judgment based on Bristol-Myers Squibb’s (“BMS”) statutory disclaimer of all challenged claims prior to institution of trial....more

Venable LLP

FDA Approves Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab) Biosimilars: Henlius’s Bildyos® / Bilprevda®, Biocon’s Bosaya™ / Aukelso™, and Gedeon...

Venable LLP on

On October 1, 2025, the FDA approved Gedeon Richter / Hikma’s Enoby™ / Xtrenbo™ (denosumab-qbde), biosimilars of Amgen’s Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab). ...more

Venable LLP

Amgen and Biocon Reach Settlement in Prolia® / Xgeva® Biosimilar Litigation

Venable LLP on

On September 30, 2025, Amgen and Biocon Biologics reached a settlement in Case No. 1:25-cv-13358 (D.N.J.) / MDL 1:25-md-03138 (D.N.J.). The litigation related to Biocon’s Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab) provisionally...more

Goodwin

Amgen and Samsung Bioepis Settle Denosumab BPCIA Case

Goodwin on

On September 5, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey entered a Consent Order and Judgment resolving the denosumab BPCIA litigation between Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) and Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd. and...more

Goodwin

Court Denies Amgen Motion to Dismiss in Etanercept Antitrust Case

Goodwin on

On September 30, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted in part and denied in part the Motion to Dismiss filed by Amgen, Inc. and Immunex Corporation (“Amgen”) in a class action antitrust lawsuit...more

Venable LLP

AI and Enablement After Amgen v. Sanofi: Implications for Life Sciences Patents

Venable LLP on

The Supreme Court in Amgen v. Sanofi affirmed the invalidation of Amgen's antibody patents for lack of enablement. The patents at issue claimed "the entire genus" of antibodies capable of (1) binding specific amino acid...more

Goodwin

Aflibercept BPCIA Multi-District Litigation Updates

Goodwin on

The aflibercept multi-district litigation consists of multiple actions consolidated in the Northern District of West Virginia, with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron”) filing suit under the Biologics Price...more

Venable LLP

Amgen and Samsung Bioepis Reach Settlement in Prolia® / Xgeva® Biosimilar Litigation

Venable LLP on

On September 5, 2025, Amgen and Samsung Bioepis reached a settlement in Case No. 1:24-cv-08417 (D.N.J.) / 1:25-md-3138 (D.N.J.), and the Court entered a consent judgment. The litigation related to Samsung Bioepis’s Prolia® /...more

Goodwin

Amgen Fires Back with Counterclaims in Aflibercept BPCIA Litigation

Goodwin on

As we previously reported, on June 17, 2025, Regeneron filed a complaint against Amgen under the BPCIA, alleging that Amgen’s aflibercept biosimilar, PAVBLU, infringes U.S. Patent No. 12,331,099 (“the ’099 patent”)....more

Goodwin

PTAB Discretionarily Denies Two Petitions, Refers a Third to the Board in Amgen v. Bristol-Myers Squibb

Goodwin on

On July 24, 2025, Acting Director of the USPTO, Coke Morgan Stewart, denied institution of inter partes review in IPR2025-00601 and IPR2025-00602, but referred the petition in IPR2025-00603 to the Board in Amgen Inc. v....more

Venable LLP

Spotlight On: Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim) / Fulphila® (pegfilgrastim-jmdb) / Udenyca® (pegfilgrastim-cbqv) / Ziextenzo®...

Venable LLP on

Pegfilgrastim Challenged Claim Types in IPR and Litigation: Claims include those challenged in litigations and IPRs. Claims are counted in each litigation and IPR, so claims from the same patent challenged in multiple...more

Venable LLP

Spotlight On: Enbrel® (etanercept) / Erelzi® (etanercept-szzs) / Eticovo® (etanercept-ykro) - August 2025

Venable LLP on

Etanercept Challenged Claim Types in IPR and Litigation: Claims include those challenged in litigations and IPRs. Claims are counted in each litigation and IPR, so claims from the same patent challenged in multiple...more

Venable LLP

Spotlight On: Biosimilar Litigations - August 2025

Venable LLP on

Biosimilar Litigations include litigations relating to biosimilar/follow-on products of CDER-listed reference products. Litigations between biosimilar applicants/manufacturers and reference product sponsors as well as...more

Venable LLP

Spotlight On: Humira® (adalimumab) / Amjevita™ (adalimumab-atto) / Cyltezo® (adalimumab-adbm) / Hyrimoz™ (adalimumab-adaz) /...

Venable LLP on

Adalimumab Challenged Claim Types in IPR and Litigation: Claims include those challenged in litigations and IPRs. Claims are counted in each litigation and IPR, so claims from the same patent challenged in multiple...more

Venable LLP

PTAB Director Discretionarily Denies Opdivo® IPRs Based on Settled Expectations of Patent Owner

Venable LLP on

On July 24, 2025, the PTO Acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart discretionarily denied Amgen’s IPR2025-00601 and IPR2025-00602 challenging Bristol-Myers Squibb’s (“BMS”) U.S. Patent Nos. 9,856,320 (“the ’320 patent”) and...more

Venable LLP

Amgen and Accord Settle Prolia® / Xgeva® BPCIA Litigation over INTP23

Venable LLP on

On July 16, 2025, Amgen and Accord settled Case No. 1:25-cv-01305 (D.N.J.) / MDL 1:25-md-03138 (D.N.J.) alleging infringement of 34 of Amgen’s patents by Accord’s proposed Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab) biosimilar INTP23...more

Goodwin

Amgen and Accord BioPharma Settle Denosumab BPCIA Case

Goodwin on

​​​​​​​On July 16, 2025, the District Court for the District of New Jersey entered a Consent Judgment and Injunction in view of a settlement agreement between Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) and Accord BioPharma, Inc. (“Accord”)...more

Venable LLP

Fresenius Kabi and Celltrion Launch Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab) Biosimilars Conexxence™ / Bomyntra™ and Stoboclo® / Osenvelt®

Venable LLP on

On July 1, 2025, Fresenius Kabi announced the U.S. launch of Conexxence™ / Bomyntra™ (denosumab-bnht), biosimilars of Amgen’s Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab), pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties ending BPCIA...more

Goodwin

Denosumab Updates: Wyost and Jubbonti Launch as First Denosumab Biosimilars in the U.S.

Goodwin on

On June 2, 2025, Sandoz announced that WYOST® (denosumab-bbdz) and Jubbonti® (denosumab-bbdz) are now available to patients in the United States. ...more

Venable LLP

Amgen Files Three New Prolia® / Xgeva® BPCIA Litigations Against Hikma, Shanghai Henlius Biotech, and Biocon’s Proposed...

Venable LLP on

On June 25, 2025, Amgen filed its sixth and seventh BPCIA lawsuits against proposed biosimilars of Prolia® / Xgeva® (denosumab), Case No. 1:25-cv-12152 (D.N.J.) against Hikma and Gedeon Richter’s RGB-14 and Case No....more

Goodwin

Amgen Files BPCIA Complaints Against Biocon, Shanghai Henlius/Organon and Hikma/Gideon Richter Regarding Denosumab Biosimilars

Goodwin on

In the last week, Amgen, Inc and Amgen Manufacturing Ltd, LLC (“Amgen”) filed three more BPCIA complaints against companies seeking approval for a denosumab biosimilar. ...more

Venable LLP

Samsung Bioepis and Formycon’s EYLEA® IPRs Discretionarily Denied Institution Among Wave of Fintiv Denials; Regeneron Files Second...

Venable LLP on

On June 2, 2025, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) issued decisions denying institution of Samsung Bioepis’s IPR2025-00176 and Formycon’s IPR2025-00233 against claims 1–12, 14–17, 19, 20, 22–36, 39–42, 44, 45, and...more

Goodwin

Regeneron Files Another Complaint Against Amgen in Aflibercept BPCIA Litigation

Goodwin on

On June 17, 2025, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Regeneron”) filed another complaint against Amgen Inc. (“Amgen”) under the BPCIA, alleging that Amgen’s aflibercept biosimilar, PAVBLU®, infringes U.S. Patent No. 12,331,099...more

Goodwin

Third Circuit Holds That Granting Discovery Under Section 1782 Is Not a “Final” Judgment

Goodwin on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently issued an opinion holding that when a district court has ordered discovery under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, but has not yet conclusively defined the scope of that discovery, the...more

700 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 28

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide