Latest Posts › Life Sciences

Share:

HZNP Medicines LLC v. Actavis Labs. UT, Inc.

THE DISTRICT COURT’S FINDINGS REGARDING INDEFINITENESS, NON-INFRINGEMENT, AND NON-OBVIOUSNESS WERE AFFIRMED BY THE APPELLATE COURT. Case Name: HZNP Medicines LLC v. Actavis Labs. UT, Inc., No. 2017-2149, -2152, -2153,...more

Horizon Meds. LLC v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs., Inc.

RELYING ON A FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISION THAT INVALIDATED FOR LACKING AN ADEQUATE WRITTEN DESCRIPTION A PATENT FROM WHICH THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT DESCEND, THE COURT DENIED PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR FAILING...more

Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

WHILE ITS DECISION WAS A “CLOSE CALL,” THE COURT WAS NOT PREPARED TO FIND THAT PLAINTIFF’S TACTICS ENTIRELY BASELESS OR ITS LITIGATION CONDUCT SO EGREGIOUS AS TO WARRANT FEES. Case Name:Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Amneal...more

Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l Ltd.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT GRANTED BUT DENIED WITH RESPECT TO INDUCED INFRINGEMENT. Case Name: Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l Ltd., No. 2:16-cv-02525-MMD-NJK, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS...more

Valeant Pharms. N. Am. LLC v. Zydus Pharms. (USA) Inc.

BECAUSE PLAINTIFFS FAILED TO SHOW SPECIFICALLY HOW DEFENDANTS COMMITTED ANY ACT OF INFRINGEMENT IN NEW JERSEY—PARTICULARLY BY FILING AN ANDA IN WEST VIRGINIA WITH THE FDA IN MARYLAND—OR THAT ANY FUTURE, INTENDED ACTS WERE A...more

INO Therapeutics LLC v. Praxair Distribution Inc.

BUT FOR A CLERICAL ERROR TO BE ADDRESSED ON REMAND, THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AFFIRMS FINDINGS OF INELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. Case Name: INO Therapeutics LLC v. Praxair Distribution Inc., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS...more

85 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide