Latest Publications

Share:

Supreme Court Affirmance in Amgen v. Sanofi Leaves Legal Standard for Patent Enablement Undisturbed

The legal standard for enablement – the statutory requirement under 35 USC § 112 that a patent must enable those skilled in the art to “make and use” the claimed invention – remains unchanged after the US Supreme Court...more

Illegality Doctrine Rejected in Legal Cannabis Patent Case, Confirming Patent Enforceability

As the industry for cannabis that is legal under state and/or federal law continues to expand, a flurry of court cases in recent years have addressed whether these businesses can utilize the federal courts to vindicate their...more

Alert: Orange Book Transparency Act Creates Some New Obligations

The Orange Book Transparency Act of 2020, signed into law on January 5, amends section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, codifying and clarifying some patent listing requirements of existing FDA regulations....more

Alert: New Law Establishes Purple Book Patent Disclosure Requirement

Signed into law on December 27, 2020, the Biological Product Patent Transparency Act (42 U.S.C. § 262(k)(9)) requires biological reference product sponsors to provide to the US Food and Drug Administration within 30 days of...more

Alert: PTAB Rules That Patents Owned by State Entities Cannot Be Challenged Without Consent

Last week, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) dismissed petitions for inter partes review (IPR) of a patent assigned to the University of Florida Research Foundation (UFRF) based on sovereign immunity, Covidien LP v....more

Alert: Supreme Court's Cuozzo Decision Signals PTO Invalidity Proceedings Here to Stay

The Supreme Court issued a decision this week that is significant for all companies that operate in patent-intensive industries. In Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee, — S.Ct. — (2016), the Supreme Court considered...more

Blog: Four Steps to Minimize the Impact of Your Competitors’ Patents

The success of your new venture depends on avoiding costly and time consuming patent litigation. Mature companies often engage patent counsel to provide “freedom to operate” opinions with respect to specific products or...more

Supreme Court Limits Scope of Induced Infringement

In Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc. (U.S., No. 13-369), the Supreme Court held that a defendant cannot be liable for induced patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) in the absence of an underlying direct...more

Supreme Court Lowers Standard for Proving Patent Claims Are Indefinite

June 2, 2014 – The Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., No. 13-369, 572 U.S. ___ (2014), lowering the standard for showing a patent claim is invalid for indefiniteness....more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide