CFPB and DOJ Settle Fair Lending Claims Involving Allegations of Redlining, Discretionary Underwriting and Pricing, and Overt Discrimination

by Ballard Spahr LLP

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) recently announced a proposed consent order with BancorpSouth Bank to settle charges that the bank’s mortgage lending practices violated the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. According to the CFPB’s press release, the case represents the CFPB’s first use of testers or “mystery shoppers” posing as consumers to support discrimination charges. While focused on mortgage lending, the settlement has significant fair lending implications for many types of non-mortgage credit.

In their joint complaint filed in federal court in Mississippi, the CFPB and DOJ alleged that the bank’s conduct constituted a “pattern or practice of discrimination [that] was intentional and willful and implemented with reckless disregard for the rights of” African American applicants and borrowers. The bank’s alleged discriminatory conduct included the following:

  • The bank is alleged to have engaged in the redlining of majority-minority neighborhoods (census tracts with more than a 50 percent minority population) in the Memphis, Tennessee, Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), the MSA where the bank generated the most mortgage loan applications. The bank allegedly excluded most majority-minority neighborhoods in delineating its Community Reinvestment Act assessment area and discouraged mortgage lending outside of that area. It also allegedly concentrated its branch locations outside of majority-minority neighborhoods and did not “advertise meaningfully” in such neighborhoods. According to the complaint, the bank drew a smaller proportion of mortgage loan applications from majority-minority neighborhoods than its peer lenders operating in the Memphis MSA, the lending disparities between the bank and its peers were “statistically significant,” and they “cannot be explained by a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason.”
  • The bank allegedly rejected African American applicants for consumer- and business-purpose mortgage loans at significantly higher rates than similarly situated white applicants and charged African American borrowers higher annual percentage rates on such loans than it charged similarly situated white borrowers. According to the complaint, while nearly all credit decisions on mortgage loans originated by the bank for sale on the secondary market were made using an automated underwriting system, and rates on such loans were set based on rate sheets, loan officers had “wide discretion” to approve or deny mortgage loans to be held by the bank in its portfolio and “nearly unfettered discretion” to price such loans, including the interest rate and origination fee.

The complaint alleges that the bank provided only minimal guidance to loan officers on how borrower or loan characteristics should affect underwriting decisions, did not require loan officers to document factors they considered in pricing loans, and had no process to ensure consistent pricing. The agencies allege that the higher denial rates and pricing for African American applicants and borrowers resulted from the bank granting discretion to employees, coupled with inadequate controls and monitoring. The CFPB and DOJ allege that such disparities “cannot be explained by a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason,” “were not justified by a legitimate business need,” and “there were also less discriminatory alternatives available.”

  • The complaint alleges that the bank instructed its loan officers to deny applications from minority applicants more quickly than those from other applicants and not to provide credit assistance to “borderline” applicants. According to the complaint, while the bank generally permitted loan officers to assist marginal applicants, it explicitly departed from that approach for minority applicants. In making such allegations, the agencies relied on an audio recording of an internal bank meeting.

The complaint also includes allegations based on a series of “matched-pair tests” at several bank branches in which the CFPB sent an African American tester and a white tester posing as first-time home buyers to the same branch within 10 days of each other. According to the complaint, each African American tester was assigned a slightly better financial profile than the corresponding white tester, such as a higher credit score and monthly income. The complaint alleges that the African American testers were treated less favorably than the white testers, such as higher closing cost estimates and less assistance with real estate agent recommendations, and further alleges that these differences “were on the basis of the race and color and not risk-related characteristics of the testers.”

The consent order requires the bank to pay $2,776,890 into a settlement fund for “alleged victims of underwriting and/or pricing discrimination,” with the agencies determining who is entitled to monetary relief, and a $3,030,756 civil money penalty to the CFPB. The bank must also make credit offers to denied African American applicants, but is not required to “make any unsafe or unsound loan or to make a loan to a person who is not qualified based upon lawful, nondiscriminatory terms; however, [the bank] may choose to apply more flexible underwriting standards in connection with these credit offers, so long as those standards comport with safe and sound lending practices.”

In addition to hiring consultants to assist with revisions to the bank’s fair lending compliance management system and development of a redlining remedial plan, other consent order requirements include:

  1. implementing, maintaining, and monitoring underwriting and pricing policies designed to avoid unlawful discrimination;
  2. investing $4 million in a loan subsidy program—with subsidies through various means such as reduced interest rates or grants for closing cost or down payment assistance—to make mortgage loans to qualified applicants in majority-minority neighborhoods in the Memphis MSA “on a more affordable basis than [the bank] otherwise makes available;”
  3. spending at least $100,000 annually for at least three years on targeted advertising and outreach to generate applications for mortgage loans from qualified residents in majority-minority neighborhoods in the Memphis MSA;
  4. opening a new branch or loan production office in a high-minority neighborhood in the Memphis MSA; and
  5. spending at least $500,000 on partnerships with community-based or governmental organizations that provide services such as financial education, homeownership counseling, foreclosure prevention services, and credit repair to residents of majority-minority neighborhoods in the Memphis MSA.

The remedial actions required by the consent order track those required by the CFPB and DOJ in the consent order they entered into with Hudson City Savings Bank last year to settle allegations that the bank engaged in a pattern or practice of redlining predominantly minority neighborhoods in its residential mortgage lending.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ballard Spahr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ballard Spahr LLP

Ballard Spahr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.