Claims of Hostile Work Environment Happened Over Too Long a Period, Court Rules

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
Contact

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected claims from a university professor that she had been subjected to a series of retaliatory acts in the two- and one-half year period following her filing an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charge accusing the university of discriminating against her on the basis of race. The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the alleged retaliatory acts rose to the level of a hostile and offensive work environment.

In Ogbonna-McGruder v. Austin Peay State Univ., the plaintiff included four examples of alleged retaliatory actions, including reassigning her to a basement office and replacing her with a white professor for a class she had taught for years. The Sixth Circuit concluded that as a matter of law, these were discrete events that occurred over a long time period and did not constitute a hostile and offensive work environment. Regardless of the connection between the alleged events and her earlier EEOC charge, claims of retaliatory harassment require demonstration of a hostile and offensive environment.

The Sixth Circuit also rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the U.S. Supreme Court’s Burlington Northern decision only requires the plaintiff to demonstrate that the retaliatory conduct would deter a reasonable person from pursuing legal claims against the employer. That case did not deal with claims of retaliatory harassment and the hostile and offensive work environment requirement applies in that context.

Employers should be cautious when interpreting the extent of this decision. The Fourth Circuit and other federal courts have in recent years concluded that use of racial slurs almost automatically meets the requirement for a hostile work environment. Also, seemingly disparate events that occur within a short time period could be considered adequate to meet this test. However, retaliatory harassment claims should be evaluated taking into account the need for the alleged conduct to be more than an irritant or disappointment to the complaining party.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
Contact
more
less

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide