Financial Services Weekly News - August 2017 #2

by Goodwin
Contact

Goodwin

Editor's Note
 

In This Issue. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released prototypes of “Know Before You Owe” overdraft disclosure forms and provided an updated rulemaking agenda for 2017; the Federal Reserve proposed guidelines to clarify the roles of bank boards and management, and also proposed a new rating system for large financial institutions; the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) staff issued a Risk Alert regarding the findings from its second cybersecurity initiative; an important decision from the Delaware Supreme Court clarified the role of deal price in appraisal proceedings; and the Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of two Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) class actions on Spokeo grounds. These and other recent developments are covered below.

Regulatory Developments

CFPB Releases Prototypes of “Know Before You Owe” Overdraft Disclosure Forms

On August 4, the CFPB published four prototypes of model overdraft disclosure forms the CFPB is testing as part of its larger “Know Before You Owe” efforts. The prototypes attempt to clarify costs and risks associated with opting in to overdraft coverage offered by many banks and credit unions. While many view overdraft coverage as an important tool for consumers in meeting their short-term financial needs, the CFPB has published a report showing that “frequent” overdrafters incur substantial fees in connection with their overdrafts. Based on this and other studies, the CFPB has taken the position that clearer disclosures about overdraft coverage may be needed. The release of the disclosure prototypes is important both because it may mean financial institutions will need to change their disclosure forms in the near future and also because it signals continued focus on overdrafts by the CFPB, which has previously indicated that it may engage in formal rulemaking on overdraft issues at some point in the future.

CFPB Updates Its Spring 2017 Rulemaking Agenda

On July 20, the CFPB announced that updates to its Spring 2017 rulemaking agenda have been posted online on the Office of Management and Budget’s webpage. The amended agenda highlights both areas of anticipated regulatory focus as well as recent rule changes that the CFPB is already in the process of implementing. View the LenderLaw Watch blog post.

Fed Proposes Guidance Distinguishing Roles of Bank Boards and Management

On August 3, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System issued a proposal to streamline its supervisory expectations for bank boards of directors. The proposal clarifies the distinction between the roles of bank boards and senior management teams. For large banks with more than $50 billion in assets, the Federal Reserve proposed new criteria by which it will assess bank boards. These five “key attributes” include setting clear, consistent strategic direction and risk tolerance; actively managing information flow and board discussions; holding senior management accountable; supporting independent risk management and internal audit functions; and maintaining a capable board composition and governance structure. The Federal Reserve proposed additional changes that would apply to banks of all sizes, including revising or rescinding supervisory expectations for boards that do not relate to their core responsibilities. It also clarified that in most cases, matters requiring attention should be directed to the bank’s senior management team, not to the board. Comments on the proposal are due 60 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register.

Fed Proposes New Rating System for Large Financial Institutions

On August 3, the Federal Reserve proposed a new supervisory rating scale for large financial institutions, such as domestic bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies with $50 billion or more in total consolidated assets, as well as the intermediate holding companies of foreign banking organizations operating in the United States (covered financial institutions). The proposed supervisory rating scale would assign ratings for three categories: capital planning, liquidity risk management and governance and controls. Covered financial institutions would receive ratings in each category. To be considered “well-managed,” a covered financial institution would need to be highly rated in each category. The Federal Reserve hopes that the new supervisory rating system will better align the ratings system with its existing supervisory program as well as provide clarity and consistency around its supervisory expectations. Comments on the proposal are due 60 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. Consistent with existing practice, the new rating system would not apply to insurance companies supervised by the Federal Reserve. Firms with less than $50 billion in total consolidated assets, including community banks, would continue to use the current rating system, which reflects longstanding supervisory practices for those firms.

OCC Revises “Failure Acquisitions” Booklet

On August 3, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released a revised “Failure Acquisitions” booklet of the Comptroller’s Licensing Manual (Manual), which supersedes the April 1998 version of the booklet. The revised booklet is the latest in a series of recent updates to the Manual, and it provides an overview of the bidding process for national banks and federal savings associations interested in acquiring failing depository institutions through the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) failure resolution process. Among other things, the revised booklet describes the procedures bidders should follow in seeking OCC clearance for such transactions, as well as the criteria considered by the OCC when evaluating a bid.

OCIE Issues Risk Alert: Observations From Cybersecurity Examinations

The SEC’s OCIE staff issued a Risk Alert discussing the findings from its second cybersecurity initiative designed to assess preparedness of firms in the securities industry. The staff reported an overall improvement in cybersecurity preparedness since its first cybersecurity initiative in 2014 and highlighted several elements that the staff views as a “robust” set of controls, including maintenance of a current inventory of data, information and vendors, policies and procedures containing detailed cybersecurity-related instructions, maintenance of testing schedules and processes for testing data integrity and vulnerabilities, established and enforced controls to access data and systems, mandatory employee training and engaged senior management that has vetted and approved the policies and procedures. Nonetheless, the staff observed areas where compliance and oversight had room for improvement. For example, with respect to written policies and procedures, OCIE staff found that firms’ policies and procedures often were either not reasonably tailored or were not adhered to or enforced in actual practice. OCIE staff also observed issues related to firms’ Regulation S-P obligations to protect customer information and privacy where firms continued to use outdated operating systems no longer supported by security patches, or where firms failed to fully remediate negative findings from previous testing in a timely manner. 

Investment Management Director to Leave SEC

On August 3, the SEC announced that David W. Grim, Director of the Division of Investment Management, will leave the agency next month after more than 20 years of public service. The announcement listed key initiatives that were advanced under Mr. Grim’s two-year leadership as the division’s Director. Chairman Jay Clayton commended his service.

Enforcement & Litigation

Client Alert: Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies the Role of Deal Price in Appraisal Proceedings

In a long-awaited decision regarding Delaware’s appraisal statute, the Delaware Supreme Court ruled that in determining the fair value of a company, there is no presumption that the agreed upon transaction price is the fair value. However, if there is a sufficiently robust sale process, free of self-interest conflicts, the Chancery Court may be justified in looking solely at the agreed upon price as the best indicator of fair value. For more information, view the client alert issued by Goodwin’s Mergers and Acquisitions and Securities and Shareholder Litigation practices.

Seventh Circuit Affirms Spokeo Dismissal of FCRA Class Action

Last week, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of two FCRA class actions on Spokeo grounds. The cases, which were consolidated for appeal, were filed by the same plaintiff against two corporate defendants alleged to have provided credit-report disclosures that did not comply with the FCRA. The Seventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Groshek v. Time Warner Cable, Inc. and Groshek v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. (together, “Groshek”) because it concluded that the plaintiff failed to adequately allege any concrete injury. The decision has strategic implications for defendants considering whether to seek dismissal of similar FCRA cases and for those planning defenses to certification motions. View the LenderLaw Watch blog post.

CFPB Orders National Bank to Pay $4.6 Million in Civil Penalties for Credit Reporting Practices

On August 2, the CFPB announced that it had entered into a consent order with a national bank, resolving allegations as to the bank’s allegedly unlawful credit reporting activities. According to the CFPB, the bank violated several federal laws with respect to its reporting practices, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681(m)(a)(3)(A),1681s-2(a)(8)(E)(iii), Regulation V, and the Consumer Financial Protection Act, 12 U.S.C. §  5536(a)(1)(A). View the Enforcement Watch blog post.

Virginia AG Settles With Local Small Dollar Lender Over Excessive Fees

On August 1, the Virginia Attorney General’s Office (AG) announced that it had entered into a consent order with a state pawnbroker, settling allegations that the company overcharged consumers and was “skirting laws.” According to the AG, the company was in the business of offering consumers small dollar loans in exchange for the consumer’s personal property, which was held by the company as security for the loan. View the Enforcement Watch blog post.

Debt Collection Firm Enters Consent Judgment for $1 Million in Restitution With Massachusetts AG

On July 27, the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office (Massachusetts AG) announced that it entered into a consent judgment with the largest debt collection law firm in the state and two of its principals. The consent judgment, which asserted violations of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, G.L. chapter 93A, section 2, was entered in Suffolk County Superior Court. The lawsuit that formed the basis for the consent judgment was originally filed in 2015. View the Enforcement Watch blog post.

Arizona AG Obtains Judgment and Injunction Against Mortgage Relief Operation

On July 27, the Arizona Attorney General’s Office (Arizona AG) announced that it had obtained a judgment against an allegedly fraudulent mortgage relief company and its owner. The company is alleged to have targeted homeowners who were considering defaulting on “upside down” mortgages. The company purportedly promised to take over the mortgages with tenant buyers who would live in the houses and whose ultimate goal would be to purchase the home.  According to the Arizona AG, the company failed to make promised mortgage payments or apply the tenants’ payments to the mortgages, causing the homes to go into foreclosure and negatively impact the homeowners’ credit ratings. View the Enforcement Watch blog post.

U.S. Department of Justice Indicts Russian National and Bitcoin Exchange

On July 26, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that a grand jury in the Northern District of California had indicted Alexander Vinnik, a Russian national, and BTC-e, the bitcoin exchange that Vinnik allegedly operated, and one of the world’s largest and most widely used digital currency exchanges. The 21-count indictment alleges that Vinnik, who had been arrested in Greece a day earlier on July 25, owned and operated several BTC-e accounts, including administrator accounts. View the Digital Currency and Blockchain Perspectives blog post.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Goodwin | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Goodwin
Contact
more
less

Goodwin on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.