Antoinette F. Konski

Antoinette F. Konski

Foley & Lardner LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Posts › USPTO

Share:

Will the USPTO Respond to Public Feedback of Its Eligibility Guidance?

Periodically, the USPTO holds open meetings with the public to discuss its thinking on current topics relating to the patent procurement process. Late last week, the Biotechnology, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Customer...more

8/26/2014 - Mayo v. Prometheus Myriad Myriad-Mayo Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents Public Comment Public Procurement Policies USPTO

Yamanaka iPSC Patent Challenged

Dr. Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University shared the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Dr. John B. Gurdon for their respective discoveries that mature, specialized cells can be reprogrammed to become immature...more

8/22/2014 - DNA Inter Partes Review Proceedings Patents Shinya Yamanaka USPTO

Federal Circuit Dismisses WARF Stem Cell Case – A Missed Opportunity

Recently in Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, No. 2013-1377 (Fed. Cir. 2014), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) dismissed Appellant Consumer Watchdog’s appeal on the...more

6/16/2014 - Appeals Article III Consumer Watchdog DNA Inter Partes Review Proceedings Litigation Strategies Myriad Patent Litigation Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents SCOTUS Section 101 Stem cells USPTO WARF

Patent-Eligibility of Stem Cells Under New USPTO "Myriad-Mayo" Guidance

In March, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) implemented new procedures to address whether inventions that relate in whole or in part to laws of nature and naturally occurring products are patent-eligibility in...more

4/29/2014 - AMP v Myriad Mayo v. Prometheus Myriad Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents SCOTUS Stem cells USPTO

USPTO Issues Guidance for Examining Process Patents

On March 4th, 2014, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued “2014 Procedures For Subject Matter Eligibility Analysis Of Claims Reciting Or Involving Laws of Nature/Natural Principles, Natural Phenomena, And/Or...more

3/7/2014 - AMP v Myriad Mayo v. Prometheus Myriad Patent Litigation Patents SCOTUS USPTO

USPTO Issues New Guidelines on Subject Matter Eligibility Under 35 USC 101 in View of Myriad and Prometheus

The USPTO issued new guidelines for determining if claims are eligible for patenting in light of the Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S., 133 S. Ct. 2107, 2116, 106 USPQ2d 1972 (2013), and...more

3/6/2014 - Patent-Eligible Subject Matter USPTO

USPTO to Apply Myriad Beyond Isolated DNA

Today, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a Guidance, advising examiners and the public of the factors for determining whether an invention satisfies the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of 35...more

3/5/2014 - AMP v Myriad DNA Genetic Materials Myriad SCOTUS USPTO

Personalized Medicine Patenting Update

Patenting diagnostic methods is more challenging in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Courts Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. __ (2012) (Prometheus) and the USPTO’s application of the...more

1/14/2013 - Diagnostic Method Mayo v. Prometheus Patents Personalized Medicine SCOTUS USPTO

Myriad Responds: ACLU Asks the Wrong Question

On October 31, 2012, Myriad Genetics, Inc. et al. (“Respondent” or “Myriad”) filed its brief in opposition to Petitioners’ (The Association for Molecular Pathology et al., represented by the American Civil Liberties Union or...more

11/15/2012 - ACLU DNA Human Genes Myriad Patent-Eligible Subject Matter Patents SCOTUS USPTO

9 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 1