Patent-in-Suit

News & Analysis as of

Case Dismissed After Claims Upon Which Lawsuit Was Initiated Were Cancelled During Re-Examination

Defendant Extended Disc North America, Inc. ("EDNA") filed a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity, and, alternatively, a motion to dismiss against plaintiff Target Training International, Ltd.'s...more

Willfulness Allegations Are Dismissed

Plaintiff contends that defendant had knowledge of eight of the patents-in-suit from the date of a patent portfolio auction of over 6000 patents more than a year before this suit was filed. It contends defendant knew of some...more

Dismissal For Failure To State A Claim For Joint Infringement Is Recommended

The disputed technology relates to products and services for live streaming media, including subscription services for TV Everywhere. Defendants offer apps that gather statistics which are transmitted to and used by third...more

Claim Term Is Construed In Lacosamide ANDA Case

Stark, C.J. Claim construction ruling issues on one term from the patent-in-suit. Multimedia technology tutorials had been submitted, and a claim construction hearing took place on December 15, 2014....more

Transfer To California Is Denied

A motion to transfer venue is considered a non-dispositive motion. There are 7 related cases regarding the same patent-in-suit. Plaintiff is a Delaware LLC with its principal place of business in Wilmington. Defendant is a...more

Summary Judgment Regarding Noninfringement Is Denied.

The patent at issue relates to a user interface for the driver of a vehicle. In a related matter, the granted summary judgment that the patent-in-suit was anticipated by prior art. The parties then submitted supplemental...more

Claim Construction Issues In ANDA Case.

Andrews, J. Claim construction opinion regarding x disputed terms from 6 patents. Oral argument took place on May 22, 2015. The disputed product relates to ritanovir. The disputed claims construed are...more

Good Faith Belief of a Patent's Invalidity Not a Defense to Induced Infringement

On May 26, 2015, the Supreme Court held in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys, Inc. that a defendant’s good-faith belief in the invalidity of the patent-in-suit is not a defense to induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b)....more

Disputed Terms Are Construed In Colchicine Dispute

Robinson, J. Claim construction opinion issues regarding three disputed terms from four patents-in-suit. The court construes the following disputed terms...more

Post-Trial Motions Are Denied

The disputed invention relates to measure-through-motion technology. Defendant conceded infringement of two patents-in-suit in light of claim construction before trial. A 10-day trial was held in August, 2014. The jury...more

Stay Pending IPR Is Denied

Robinson, J. Defendants’ motion for partial stay pending inter partes review is denied. Defendant petitioned for IPR for five of the ten patents-in-suit. The PTAB has instituted review of 4 of the 5 patents-in-suit. The...more

Dismissal For Failure To State A Claim For Joint Infringement Is Recommended

Thynge, C.M. J. . Report and recommendation that defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim of joint infringement be granted. The disputed technology relates to multicasting method and apparatus and...more

Keeping Up With Kyle Bass

In the few weeks since I first wrote about Kyle Bass and the Coalition for Affordable Drugs he formed to challenge Orange Book-listed patents that he believes “have little value other than to drive up prescription drug...more

Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

Case Name: Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., Civ. No. 11-6936 (FSH), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26207 (D.N.J. Mar. 4, 2015) (Hochberg, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Atelvia® (risedronate /...more

Ranbaxy Labs., Ltd. v. Burwell

Case Name: Ranbaxy Labs., Ltd. v. Burwell, 14-cv-1923 BAH, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29459 (D.D.C. Mar. 11, 2015) (Howell, J.). Drug Products and Patents-in-Suit: Nexium® (esomeprazole) and Valcyte® (valganciclovir);...more

Eli Lilly & Co. v. Mylan Pharms., Inc.

Case Name: Eli Lilly & Co. v. Mylan Pharms., Inc., Civ. No. 14-cv-00389-SEB-TAB, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30175 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 12, 2015) (Barker, J.). Drug Product and Patents-in-Suit: Effient® (prasugrel hydrochloride);...more

Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Mylan Inc.

Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Mylan Inc., Civ. No. 14-777-RGA, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31812 (D. Del. March 16, 2015) (Andrews, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Exelon Patch (rivastigmine); U.S. Patents...more

Takeda Pharm. Co., Ltd. v. TWi Pharms., Inc.

Case Name: Takeda Pharm. Co., Ltd. v. TWi Pharms., Inc., Civ. No. 13-CV-02420-LHK, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32948 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015) (Koh, J.). Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Dexilant® (dexlansoprazole); U.S....more

Cadence Pharms., Inc. v. Exela PharmSci Inc.

Cadence Pharms., Inc. v. Exela PharmSci Inc. Case Name: Cadence Pharms., Inc. v. Exela PharmSci Inc., 2014-1184, 2015 U.S. App LEXIS 4700 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 23, 2015) (Circuit Judges Reyna, Linn, and Wallach presiding;...more

District Court Dismisses Action after Patent Is Transferred to President of Company

After Plaintiff Pi-Net International, Inc. ("Pi-Net") brought suit against Defendants Focus Business Bank and Bridge Bank, N.A. for patent infringement, the Patent and Trademark Office initiated an Inter Partes Review ("IPR")...more

Summary Judgment Finding Recommended As To Non-Willfulness But Not As To Non-Infringement

Burke, C. J. Report and Recommendation that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of claim 11 of the patent-in-suit be denied, and for non-willfulness be granted....more

Motions To Stay Pending Resolution Of Rule 12 Motions Is Granted.

Kaavo Inc. v. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, et al, C.A. Nos. 14-1192-LPS-CJB; 14-1193-LPS-CJB, April 9, 2015. Burke, C. J. Defendants’ motions to stay proceedings pending resolution of Rule 13 motions to...more

District Court Lifts Stay After Covered Business Method Review Is Dismissed Because Federal Circuit Would Not Have Jurisdiction to...

Plaintiff GT Nexus, Inc. ("GT Nexus") filed a declaratory judgment action against Inttra, Inc. ("Inttra") seeking a declaration that four of Inttra's patents ("patents-in-suit") were invalid and have not been infringed....more

Schedule Is Extended On Motion Of Intervenor

A non-party intervenor acquired the patents-in-suit after the complaint was filed and a scheduling order was entered in this action. ...more

Cloud Storage Company Grounded in D. Mass.

A patent defendant specializing in “virtual” database systems recently learned how real its burden is when seeking to transfer out of the District of Massachusetts. Delphix Corp. (“Delphix”) and Actifio, Inc. (“Actifio”) have...more

79 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 4

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×