Defendant Extended Disc North America, Inc. ("EDNA") filed a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement and invalidity, and, alternatively, a motion to dismiss against plaintiff Target Training International, Ltd.'s...more
Plaintiff contends that defendant had knowledge of eight of the patents-in-suit from the date of a patent portfolio auction of over 6000 patents more than a year before this suit was filed. It contends defendant knew of some...more
The disputed technology relates to products and services for live streaming media, including subscription services for TV Everywhere. Defendants offer apps that gather statistics which are transmitted to and used by third...more
Stark, C.J. Claim construction ruling issues on one term from the patent-in-suit. Multimedia technology tutorials had been submitted, and a claim construction hearing took place on December 15, 2014....more
A motion to transfer venue is considered a non-dispositive motion. There are 7 related cases regarding the same patent-in-suit. Plaintiff is a Delaware LLC with its principal place of business in Wilmington. Defendant is a...more
The patent at issue relates to a user interface for the driver of a vehicle. In a related matter, the granted summary judgment that the patent-in-suit was anticipated by prior art. The parties then submitted supplemental...more
Andrews, J. Claim construction opinion regarding x disputed terms from 6 patents. Oral argument took place on May 22, 2015.
The disputed product relates to ritanovir. The disputed claims construed are...more
On May 26, 2015, the Supreme Court held in Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys, Inc. that a defendant’s good-faith belief in the invalidity of the patent-in-suit is not a defense to induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b)....more
Robinson, J. Claim construction opinion issues regarding three disputed terms from four patents-in-suit.
The court construes the following disputed terms...more
The disputed invention relates to measure-through-motion technology. Defendant conceded infringement of two patents-in-suit in light of claim construction before trial. A 10-day trial was held in August, 2014. The jury...more
Robinson, J. Defendants’ motion for partial stay pending inter partes review is denied.
Defendant petitioned for IPR for five of the ten patents-in-suit. The PTAB has instituted review of 4 of the 5 patents-in-suit. The...more
Thynge, C.M. J. . Report and recommendation that defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim of joint infringement be granted.
The disputed technology relates to multicasting method and apparatus and...more
In the few weeks since I first wrote about Kyle Bass and the Coalition for Affordable Drugs he formed to challenge Orange Book-listed patents that he believes “have little value other than to drive up prescription drug...more
Case Name: Warner Chilcott Co., LLC v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., Civ. No. 11-6936 (FSH), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26207 (D.N.J. Mar. 4, 2015) (Hochberg, J.).
Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Atelvia® (risedronate /...more
Case Name: Ranbaxy Labs., Ltd. v. Burwell, 14-cv-1923 BAH, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29459 (D.D.C. Mar. 11, 2015) (Howell, J.).
Drug Products and Patents-in-Suit: Nexium® (esomeprazole) and Valcyte® (valganciclovir);...more
Case Name: Eli Lilly & Co. v. Mylan Pharms., Inc., Civ. No. 14-cv-00389-SEB-TAB, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30175 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 12, 2015) (Barker, J.).
Drug Product and Patents-in-Suit: Effient® (prasugrel hydrochloride);...more
Case Name: Novartis Pharms. Corp. v. Mylan Inc., Civ. No. 14-777-RGA, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31812 (D. Del. March 16, 2015) (Andrews, J.).
Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Exelon Patch (rivastigmine); U.S. Patents...more
Case Name: Takeda Pharm. Co., Ltd. v. TWi Pharms., Inc., Civ. No. 13-CV-02420-LHK, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32948 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2015) (Koh, J.).
Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit: Dexilant® (dexlansoprazole); U.S....more
Cadence Pharms., Inc. v. Exela PharmSci Inc.
Case Name: Cadence Pharms., Inc. v. Exela PharmSci Inc., 2014-1184, 2015 U.S. App LEXIS 4700 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 23, 2015) (Circuit Judges Reyna, Linn, and Wallach presiding;...more
After Plaintiff Pi-Net International, Inc. ("Pi-Net") brought suit against Defendants Focus Business Bank and Bridge Bank, N.A. for patent infringement, the Patent and Trademark Office initiated an Inter Partes Review ("IPR")...more
Burke, C. J. Report and Recommendation that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of claim 11 of the patent-in-suit be denied, and for non-willfulness be granted....more
Kaavo Inc. v. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, et al, C.A. Nos. 14-1192-LPS-CJB; 14-1193-LPS-CJB, April 9, 2015.
Burke, C. J. Defendants’ motions to stay proceedings pending resolution of Rule 13 motions to...more
Plaintiff GT Nexus, Inc. ("GT Nexus") filed a declaratory judgment action against Inttra, Inc. ("Inttra") seeking a declaration that four of Inttra's patents ("patents-in-suit") were invalid and have not been infringed....more
A non-party intervenor acquired the patents-in-suit after the complaint was filed and a scheduling order was entered in this action. ...more
A patent defendant specializing in “virtual” database systems recently learned how real its burden is when seeking to transfer out of the District of Massachusetts. Delphix Corp. (“Delphix”) and Actifio, Inc. (“Actifio”) have...more
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*
Back to Top