News & Analysis as of

Direct Infringement

Willcox & Savage

Court Dismisses Most Claims In Two AI Copyright Cases

Willcox & Savage on

The U.S. District Court for the North District of California dismissed four of six claims in a pair of cases alleging that the use by OpenAI, Inc. of the plaintiffs’ books infringed the copyrights in those books. Tremblay v....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

OpenAI's Motion to Dismiss NY Times Lawsuit over ChatGPT: Do They Want to Win or Influence Public Opinion?

In response to the lawsuit the New York Times has filed against it, OpenAI has sought to dismiss portions of the complaint. But instead of filing a traditional motion to dismiss that argues that the allegations of the...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal and Federal Court release three decisions relating to macitentan (Janssen’s OPSUMIT)

Smart & Biggar on

Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismisses appeal on finding of inducement: Apotex Inc v Janssen Inc, 2023 FCA 220 - Apotex appealed the trial decision, finding that Apo-Macitentan would infringe Canadian Patent No. 2,659,770...more

BakerHostetler

AD-ttorneys@law - September 2023

BakerHostetler on

Room Rental Site Sued Over Chimerical Reviews and Listings - FTC keeps promise to ramp up negative attention on false positives - Ghosted - Remember the first time you hunted for your own apartment? The anguish of...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

From Punchlines to Plaintiffs: Meta Platforms and Open AI File Motions to Dismiss Comedian Sarah Silverman’s Copyright...

Meta Platforms (parent company of Facebook) and OpenAI (creator of ChatGPT) have individually filed a Motion to Dismiss the class-action lawsuit filed by comedian Sarah Silverman and authors Richard Kadrey and Christopher...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

"Server Test" Is Reaffirmed (For Now) in Hunley v. Instagram, LLC

On July 17, 2023, in Hunley v. Instagram, LLC, No. 22-15293, the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed the "server test," which protects websites from copyright liability for embedding images that are hosted on another website's server....more

AEON Law

Patent Poetry: Federal Circuit Reverses Dismissal Based on Patent Claim Preclusion

AEON Law on

The Federal Circuit has ruled that claim preclusion doesn’t apply to allegations of induced infringement based on an earlier finding of direct infringement. The patent at issue, US Patent No. 8,206,987 titled...more

Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP

Federal Circuit Takes Claim Preclusion by the Horns

On July 5, in Inguran, LLC v. ABS Global, Inc, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion clarifying the preclusive effect of a direct infringement claim on subsequent inducement claims. The court held that an earlier direct...more

Smart & Biggar

FCA finds Teva would directly infringe and induce infringement of Janssen’s paliperidone palmitate patent

Smart & Biggar on

As previously reported, the Federal Court (FC) found that Teva would directly infringe but not induce infringement of certain claims of Canadian Patent No. 2,655,335 (335 patent) regarding its paliperidone palmitate product...more

McDermott Will & Emery

ANDA Filing Alone Insufficient for Induced Infringement of Method Patent

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a district court’s findings of invalidity and noninfringement in a Hatch-Waxman case involving two sets of method patents directed to modulating dosages of pirfenidone, a...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Yes, Copyright Can Protect Monstrous Mountains

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Typically, Godzilla and other kaiju (Japanese for “strange beast” and also referring to a genre of fiction involving giant monsters) use their armored skin, massive size, and superpowers to protect themselves against almost...more

Smart & Biggar

Angelcare and Playtex take out the trash: Diaper Genie patents are valid and infringed by Munchkin

Smart & Biggar on

On April 7, 2022, the Federal Court issued its judgment and reasons in Angelcare Canada Inc et al v Munchkin Inc et al (2022 FC 507), finding that Munchkin, Inc and Munchkin Baby Canada Ltd (the “Defendants” or “Munchkin”)...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Roche Diagnostics Corp. v. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2022)

U.S. patent law grants patent owners the right to grant licenses to their patents in analogy to landlords granting rents to real property as a license to use without obtaining ownership.  35 U.S.C. §§ 261-262.  But the...more

Knobbe Martens

The Heightened Standard of Proving Induced Infringement

Knobbe Martens on

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION v. MESO SCALE DIAGNOSTICS, LLC - Before Newman, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. Summary: A finding of inducing infringement requires...more

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Employee/Officer Held Personally Liable for Patent Infringement

In Lubby Holdings LLC v. Chung, the Federal Circuit held corporate officers and employees who actively assist with their corporation’s infringement may be personally liable for inducing infringement even without any piercing...more

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court holds summary trial appropriate, Apotex and Pharmascience will induce infringement of paliperidone palmitate patent

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court released a pair of decisions in patent litigation relating to paliperidone palmitate (Janssen’s INVEGA SUSTENNA): Janssen Inc v Pharmascience, 2022 FC 62 and Janssen Inc v Apotex, 2022 FC 107. Pharmascience...more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review - October 2021

Knobbe Martens on

No Assembly, No Infringement – Federal Circuit Declines to Expand the “Final Assembler” Theory of Direct Infringement In Acceleration Bay LLC v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Appeal No. 20-1700 the Federal Circuit held that...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Failing to Address All Reasons for Noninfringement Renders Appeal Moot

McDermott Will & Emery on

In deciding whether the district court correctly interpreted various claim terms in four patents related to communication techniques used in computer gaming technology, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found...more

Knobbe Martens

No Assembly, No Infringement – Federal Circuit Declines to Expand “Final Assembler” Theory of Direct Infringement

Knobbe Martens on

ACCELERATION BAY LLC v. TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE - Before Moore, Reyna, and Hughes.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.  Summary:  The “final assembler” theory of direct...more

McDermott Will & Emery

One for All, and All for One . . . Except When It Comes to Patent License Comparability

McDermott Will & Emery on

Examining whether portfolio patent licenses can be sufficiently comparable to a single-patent license for the purposes of supporting a patent damages verdict, a split panel of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit...more

Knobbe Martens

Patentee Failed to Apportion Licenses to Bundled Patents to Establish Royalties

Knobbe Martens on

OMEGA PATENTS, LLC v. CALAMP CORPORATION - Before Prost, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Summary: Licensing policies that allow use of any or all of a...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Andrews Denies Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff’s Allegations Of Direct Infringement

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Express Mobile, Inc. v. Squarespace, Inc., Civil Action No. 20-1163-RGA (D.Del. August 25, 2021), the Court, inter alia, denied Defendant’s motion to...more

A&O Shearman

Roche Diabetes Care Succeeds in UK Medtech Patent Dispute Against Insulet

A&O Shearman on

In the latest UK medical technology (Medtech) patent decision Insulet v Roche Diabetes Care [2021] EWHC 1933 (Pat), Ms Pat Treacy (sitting as a judge of the High Court) held that (i) Roche Diabetes Care’s Accu-Chek Solo...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Latest Federal Court Cases - June 2021

Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, Appeal Nos. 2020-1475, -1605 (Fed. Cir. May 28, 2021)- In this week’s Case of the Week, the Federal Circuit considered an appeal from the International Trade...more

Cooley LLP

Alert: GSK v. Teva – Induced Infringement Liability Despite Skinny Label

Cooley LLP on

In GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit reinstated a jury's verdict that Teva infringed GSK's patented method of using its Coreg® drug product, even though Teva's product was initially...more

141 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 6

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide