Burt M. Rublin

Burt M. Rublin

Ballard Spahr LLP

Contact  |  View Bio  |  RSS

Latest Publications

Share:

"Real" Harm Required To Recover Statutory Damages, U.S. Supreme Court Rules

In a long-anticipated and significant decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 6-2 that a plaintiff alleging a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) does not have standing under Article III of the U.S....more

5/18/2016 - Article III Class Action FCRA Injury-in-Fact SCOTUS Spokeo v Robins Standing Statutory Damages

Third Circuit Follows Gomez on Mootness Issue, But Narrowly

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's holding in Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez that an unaccepted Rule 68 offer of complete relief does not moot a plaintiff's individual claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third...more

4/8/2016 - Article III Campbell Ewald v Gomez Class Action Class Representatives Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. Symczyk Mootness Rule 68 SCOTUS Settlement Offer Standing TCPA

Supreme Court Allows Use of Statistical Sampling in Class Actions, But Only In Narrow Circumstances

The U.S. Supreme Court has held that statistical sampling may be proper in some contexts in its long-awaited decision in Tyson Foods, Inc. v. Bouaphakeo. The case involves the use of statistical sampling by plaintiffs in...more

3/25/2016 - Admissible Evidence Class Action Class Certification Doffing Donning FLSA SCOTUS Statistical Sampling Tyson Foods v Bouaphakeo Unpaid Overtime Wage and Hour

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Closely Watched Consumer Class Action Case

In its first conference since the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an important Seventh Circuit case that emphatically rejected a ''heightened'' standard for ascertaining class members...more

3/4/2016 - Ascertainable Class Certiorari Class Action Consumer Financial Products Corporate Counsel Justice Scalia Putative Class Actions SCOTUS

Unaccepted Rule 68 Offer Does Not Moot Plaintiff's Claims, SCOTUS Rules

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that an unaccepted Rule 68 settlement offer does not moot a class action even when the offer would provide the named plaintiff with complete individual relief. The decision in Campbell-Ewald...more

1/28/2016 - Campbell Ewald v Gomez Class Action Class Representatives Mootness Rule 68 SCOTUS Settlement Offer TCPA

Unaccepted Rule 68 Offer Does Not Moot a Plaintiff's Claims, U.S. Supreme Court Rules

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that an unaccepted Rule 68 settlement offer does not moot a class action even when the offer would provide the named plaintiff with complete individual relief. The decision in Campbell-Ewald...more

1/22/2016 - Article III Campbell Ewald v Gomez Mootness Putative Class Actions Rule 68 SCOTUS Settlement Offer Standing TCPA

Ballard Spahr Represents Credit Unions in Amicus Brief Challenging FCC TCPA Order

In the case of ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ballard Spahr LLP represented the Credit Union National Association (CUNA) in filing a joint amici brief with the American...more

12/4/2015 - Amicus Briefs Credit Unions FCC Motion to Vacate TCPA

7th Circuit Rejects “Heightened” Ascertainability Requirement for Class Actions

Creating a clear circuit split on a class action issue of increasing importance, the Seventh Circuit has rejected the notion that in order to certify a class, a trial court must be able to identify class members in a reliable...more

8/3/2015 - Class Action Class Certification Consumer Fraud Corporate Counsel Dietary Supplements Nutritional Supplements Rule 23

Third Circuit Clarifies Article III Standing for Absent Class Members, Impact of Comcast

In a case of first impression in the Third Circuit, the Court of Appeals held that unnamed, putative class members are not required to establish standing under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. Rather, the Court held that...more

7/27/2015 - Antitrust Litigation Appeals Article III Class Action Comcast Comcast v. Behrend Design Defects Prudential Insurance Putative Class Actions Rule 23(b)(3) SCOTUS Standing Tyson Foods Tyson Foods v Bouaphakeo Volvo

11th Circuit: Rule 23 Trumps State Law Limitation on Class Actions

Dealing a blow to defendants facing consumer fraud litigation in the 11th Circuit, the court of appeals for that circuit has reinstated a class action under the Alabama Deceptive Trade Practice Act (ADTPA), despite that the...more

7/15/2015 - Class Action Consumer Fraud Preemption Product Defects Rule 23 Rules Enabling Act SCOTUS Shady Grove Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices

Supreme Court Ruling Could Alter Class Action Landscape

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide a case that could alter the landscape of federal class action litigation. Granting the defendant’s petition for certiorari in Campbell-Ewald Company v. Gomez, the Court will review...more

5/20/2015 - Article III Campbell Ewald v Gomez Class Action Mootness Rule 23 SCOTUS TCPA

U.S. Supreme Court To Decide If Statutory Damages Are Recoverable Even Without Any Actual Harm

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an important case that will decide whether a plaintiff who cannot show any actual harm from a violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) nevertheless has standing under Article...more

4/28/2015 - Article III FCRA Imminent Harm Putative Class Actions SCOTUS Spokeo v Robins Standing Statutory Damages

Third Circuit Rejects Class Certification in Yet Another Consumer Case

Consistent with its recent emphasis on the stringency of class certification requirements in consumer cases, the Third Circuit recently affirmed the denial of class certification in a consumer case involving alleged...more

9/17/2014 - Billing Class Action Class Certification Consumer Fraud Unjust Enrichment

Third Circuit Holds that Courts, Not Arbitrators, Should Rule on Classwide Arbitration

In Opalinski v. Robert Half International, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that where an arbitration clause is silent as to the availability of classwide arbitration, that issue should...more

8/6/2014 - Appeals Arbitration Arbitration Agreements Arbitrators Class Action Class Action Arbitration Waivers Employer Liability Issues FLSA Jurisdiction Robert Half

Third Circuit Denies Rehearing En Banc in Closely Watched Class Action

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has denied a petition for rehearing en banc in a small-dollar consumer product class action. Depending on one’s perspective, this highly anticipated ruling either enforces the...more

5/6/2014 - Affidavits Bayer BMW Class Action En Banc Review

Supreme Court To Decide Evidentiary Requirements for Removal Notices in Class Actions

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the issue of what, if any, evidence a defendant must present in a notice of removal to remove a case to federal court based on the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). In granting the...more

4/9/2014 - CAFA Class Action Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens Evidence Removal SCOTUS

FCRA Claim Provides Article III Standing without Showing of Actual Harm, Ninth Circuit Rules

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has ruled that a plaintiff had Article III standing to sue a website operator for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) regardless of whether he could show actual...more

2/11/2014 - Article III ATMs EFTA FCRA Injury-in-Fact SCOTUS Statutory Damages

State Attorney General Lawsuit Not Removable under CAFA, Supreme Court Holds

Resolving a conflict in the circuits, the U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that a parens patriae action brought by a state attorney general is not removable from state to federal court as a “mass action” under the...more

1/15/2014 - CAFA Class Action Parens Patriae Removal SCOTUS

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Holds that Scope of Act 6 Is Limited to Loans or Use of Money

For the first time, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has addressed the important issue of whether, and to what extent, Pennsylvania's Loan Interest and Protection Law (Act 6) may be used as the basis for claims that do not...more

11/27/2013 - Loans Property Tax Real Estate Transfers

Class Certification Proper Despite Prospect of ‘Meager’ Damage Recovery, Seventh Circuit Holds

The intersection between law and economics was once again the focus of an important recent class action ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit....more

9/13/2013 - Class Action Class Certification Damages EFTA

No Right to Jury Trial for Consumer Fraud Claim in Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently refused to grant plaintiffs' request to review a Superior Court decision in December 2012 that held there is no right to a jury trial for claims brought under Pennsylvania's Unfair...more

8/29/2013 - Fraud Jury Trial Right to a Jury

Court of Appeals Reaffirms Class Certification after Supreme Court Remand

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit last week reaffirmed its prior decision in favor of class certification in a breach of warranty case involving washing machines....more

8/28/2013 - Class Action Class Certification Comcast v. Behrend SCOTUS

Third Circuit Vacates Class Certification, Reaffirms Plaintiff’s Burden To Prove Readily Ascertainable Class

A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reaffirmed the importance of requiring a plaintiff in a class action to show there is a reliable and administratively feasible method for ascertaining who...more

8/14/2013 - Class Action Class Certification Wal-Mart Warranties

Pampers Consumer Class Action Settlement Reversed on Appeal

In a 2-1 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit vacated a class action settlement approval and certification of a settlement class that treated the named plaintiffs far more favorably than the other class...more

8/12/2013 - Class Action Injunctions Proctor & Gamble Reversal Settlement

Eighth Circuit Deems 'Informational Injury' Sufficient To Confer Standing

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently addressed an important issue that the U.S. Supreme Court avoided last year concerning whether a consumer must suffer actual economic harm to have standing to sue for...more

8/7/2013 - ATMs Banks Economic Damages Electronic Fund Transfer Act Standing Statutory Damages

33 Results
|
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×