The Federal Circuit considered its 35 U.S.C. § 112 enablement case law and found that “the enablement inquiry for claims that include functional requirements”—in this case, claims to antibodies defined by their function—“can...more
On November 5, 2020, in Valeant Pharms. N. Am. LLC v. Mylan Pharms. Inc., No. 2019-2402, the Federal Circuit held that venue in Hatch-Waxman cases brought under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2)(A) is proper “only in districts where...more
In December, in Amgen v. Hospira, 944 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2019), a panel of the Federal Circuit issued the first decision applying the statutory Safe Harbor of 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1) to BPCIA patent litigation. ...more
In Amgen’s long-running dispute with biosimilar-maker Sandoz over biosimilar versions of Amgen’s filgrastim (Neupogen®) and pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®) biologics, the Federal Circuit earlier this year affirmed summary judgment...more
Generics and biosimilar makers have increasingly used inter partes reviews (“IPRs”), proceedings made possible by the America Invents Act, to challenge patents protecting innovator small-molecule drugs and biologic medicines....more
Last month, the USPTO issued a memorandum to its patent examining corps clarifying its guidance concerning the written description requirement for claims drawn to antibodies. In the memorandum, the USPTO adopts the Federal...more
3/14/2018
/ Amgen ,
En Banc Review ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
Memorandum of Guidance ,
Patent Applications ,
Patent Examinations ,
Patents ,
Petition For Rehearing ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Sanofi ,
USPTO
In one of the first Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) litigations to reach trial, a jury on Friday awarded Amgen $70 million in damages for Pfizer’s infringement of one of Amgen’s expired patents...more
9/26/2017
/ 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1) ,
Amgen ,
Biologics ,
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 ,
Biosimilars ,
Damages ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Hospira ,
Intellectual Property Litigation ,
Life Sciences ,
Patent Expiration ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pfizer ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Popular ,
Prescription Drugs ,
Safe Harbors
In Ariosa Diagnostics Inc. v. Sequenom Inc., 788 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2015), a Federal Circuit panel held that Sequenom Inc.’s prenatal diagnosis patent claims patent ineligible subject matter under the two-step test of Mayo...more
9/10/2015
/ BIA ,
Biotechnology ,
DNA ,
En Banc Review ,
European Patent Office ,
Kappos ,
Mayo v. Prometheus ,
Myriad ,
Myriad-Mayo ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patent-Eligible Subject Matter ,
Patents ,
Preemption ,
Prometheus ,
SCOTUS ,
Sequenom ,
Trade Secrets ,
WARF
The courts must “say what the law is,” even when that law, as Judge Lourie described the BPCIA, is “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.” Today, in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 2015-1499 (Fed. Cir. July 23,...more
7/22/2015
/ aBLA ,
Amgen ,
Biologics ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Conversion ,
Dismissals ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Licensing Rules ,
Notice Requirements ,
Patent Dance ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Preliminary Injunctions ,
Sandoz ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
Unfair Competition
As we have discussed before, the first generation of biosimilar litigation under the Biologics Price Control and Innovation Act (BPCIA) addresses whether the BPCIA’s patent dispute resolution procedures – the “patent dance” –...more
4/2/2015
/ Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) ,
Amgen ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Citizen Petitions ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Popular