On June 12, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Amgen v. Sandoz, the landmark case about the meaning of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). First, the Supreme Court held that no federal injunction is...more
6/14/2017
/ Amgen ,
Amgen v Sandoz ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Injunctions ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Sandoz ,
SCOTUS
On January 13, 2017, the Supreme Court granted Sandoz’s petition for certiorari and Amgen’s cross-petition in Amgen v. Sandoz, case nos. 15-1039 and 15-1195. The two cases were consolidated, and an hour was allotted for oral...more
1/18/2017
/ Biologics ,
BPCIA ,
Certiorari ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Declaratory Judgments ,
License Applications ,
Notice Requirements ,
Patent Dance ,
Patent Infringement ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
SCOTUS
Last week, the Solicitor General submitted its brief in Amgen v. Sandoz, arguing that the Supreme Court should review and decide in Sandoz’s favor both questions presented by the parties’ cross-petitions for certiorari. Two...more
12/14/2016
/ Amgen v Apotex ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Cross Motions ,
Denial of Certiorari ,
Notice Requirements ,
Patent Dance ,
Petition for Writ of Certiorari ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
SCOTUS ,
Solicitor General
Today, the Supreme Court deferred a decision on certiorari in Amgen v. Sandoz, inviting the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. Sandoz petitioned for review of one aspect of the...more
On March 21, 2015, Sequenom filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court in Sequenom, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, et al. (No. 15-1182). In its petition, Sequenom calls its case the “ideal vehicle” for the...more
On June 25, 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided ABC v. Aereo, one of the more important (and most closely watched) copyright cases of the digital era. The Court’s 6-3 decision that streaming-TV startup Aereo...more