The Federal Circuit has issued a landmark venue decision setting forth the standard for determining what constitutes a “regular and established place of business” under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b). Section 1400(b) limits venue in...more
On July 5, 2016, in Amgen v. Apotex (No. 2016-1308), the Federal Circuit again held that a biosimilar applicant must provide its biologic competitor with 180 days’ notice of intent to commercially market a biosimilar product....more
7/21/2016
/ Amgen ,
Apotex ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Generic Drugs ,
Life Sciences ,
Patent Dance ,
Patent Litigation ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Popular ,
Sandoz v Amgen
Last week in Amgen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., No. 2016-1308 (Fed. Cir. July 5, 2016), a unanimous Federal Circuit panel ruled that under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”), a biosimilar applicant...more
7/13/2016
/ aBLA ,
Amgen ,
Apotex ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
Declaratory Judgments ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Generic Drugs ,
Notice of Intent ,
Patent Dance ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Sandoz v Amgen
On Monday, June 20, 2016, the Supreme Court deferred a decision on the certiorari petitions filed by both parties from the Federal Circuit’s decision in Amgen v. Sandoz, 794 F.3d 1347 (2015), and instead called for the views...more
6/24/2016
/ Amgen ,
Biologics ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Certiorari ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Life Sciences ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Sandoz ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
SCOTUS
On August 13, 2015, the Federal Circuit in Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. changed the law regarding liability for direct infringement of a method patent involving more than one actor (divided...more
Six justices of the Supreme Court agree that an accused indirect infringer’s good faith belief in invalidity of a patent “will not negate the scienter required under §271(b).” Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc., No. 13-896,...more