Latest Publications

Share:

Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

WHILE ITS DECISION WAS A “CLOSE CALL,” THE COURT WAS NOT PREPARED TO FIND THAT PLAINTIFF’S TACTICS ENTIRELY BASELESS OR ITS LITIGATION CONDUCT SO EGREGIOUS AS TO WARRANT FEES. Case Name:Reckitt Benckiser LLC v. Amneal...more

Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l Ltd.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO CONTRIBUTORY INFRINGEMENT GRANTED BUT DENIED WITH RESPECT TO INDUCED INFRINGEMENT. Case Name: Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. West-Ward Pharms. Int’l Ltd., No. 2:16-cv-02525-MMD-NJK, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS...more

Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC

AFTER A FIVE-DAY JURY TRIAL FINDING NON-INFRINGEMENT, PLAINTIFF’S RULE 59(E) MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL WAS DENIED. Case Name:Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC, No. 17-205-CFC, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213415 (D. Del. Dec. 11,...more

Persion Pharms. LLC v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd.

Case Name: Persion Pharms. LLC v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd., 2018-2361, 945 F.3d 1184 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 27, 2019) (Judges O’Malley, Reyna, and Chen presiding; Opinion by Reyna, J.) (Appeal from D. Del., Bryson, J.)....more

Duke Univ. v. Akorn, Inc.

THE COURT GRANTED PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S ANTITRUST AND PATENT MISUSE COUNTERCLAIMS AND RELATED AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. Case Name: Duke Univ. v. Akorn, Inc., Civ. No. 3:18-cv-14035-BRM-TJB, 2019 U.S. Dist....more

Bausch Health Cos. v. Actavis Labs. FL

RELYING ON PLAINTIFFS’ TESTING OF DEFENDANT’S ANDA PRODUCT, AND FINDING THAT THE PRIOR ART TAUGHT AWAY FROM THE CLAIMED INVENTION, THE COURT HELD THE ASSERTED CLAIMS VALID AND INFRINGED. Case Name: Bausch Health Cos. v....more

Forest Labs., LLC v. Sigmapharm Labs., LLC

THE COURT DENIES DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT IN RESPONSE TO ANDA HOLDER MODIFICATION OF ITS ANDA SPECIFICATION AFTER TRIAL. Case Name: Forest Labs., LLC v. Sigmapharm Labs., LLC, No. 14-1119- MSG...more

Valeant Pharms. N. Am. LLC v. Zydus Pharms. (USA) Inc.

BECAUSE PLAINTIFFS FAILED TO SHOW SPECIFICALLY HOW DEFENDANTS COMMITTED ANY ACT OF INFRINGEMENT IN NEW JERSEY—PARTICULARLY BY FILING AN ANDA IN WEST VIRGINIA WITH THE FDA IN MARYLAND—OR THAT ANY FUTURE, INTENDED ACTS WERE A...more

Galderma Labs L.P. v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc.

THE ASSERTED CLAIMS OF 1% IVERMECTIN FORMULATION ARE INVALID ON THE BASIS OF ANTICIPATION IN LIGHT OF A PRIOR ART REFERENCE THAT TEACHES APPLICATION OF 1-5% IVERMECTIN FORMULATION FOR TREATMENT OF THE SAME INDICATION. Case...more

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

THE COURT DENIED DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO ENFORCE ITS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PLAINTIFF AFTER THE AT-RISK LAUNCH AND SUBSEQUENT SETTLEMENT OF ANOTHER DEFENDANT. Case Name: Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, No. 16-853-MSG...more

Indivior Inc. v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs., S.A.

WHERE THE DEFENDANTS SOUGHT OUT A CLAIM CONSTRUCTION IN THE DISTRICT COURT, THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AFFIRMED A FINDING OF NON-INFRINGEMENT, AND WHERE THE DEFENDANT DID NOT SEEK A CLARIFYING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION, THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT...more

Eli Lilly and Co. v. Hospira, Inc.

WHILE THE DISTRICT COURT’S FINDING OF LITERAL INFRINGEMENT WAS REVERSED, THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AFFIRMED THE DISTRICT COURT’S FINDING OF INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENT BECAUSE THE NARROWING AMENDMENT WAS...more

Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC v. Dr. Reddy’s Labs., Inc.

PLAINTIFF’S DISCLAIMER OF CLAIMS FOUND INVALID BY THE PTAB MOOTED ANY CONTROVERSY BEFORE THE APPELLATE COURT ASSOCIATED WITH THAT PATENT, AND A SECOND PATENT-IN-SUIT WAS NOT INVALID BECAUSE THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN...more

Nalpropion Pharms., Inc. v. Actavis Labs. FL, Inc.

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AFFIRMED THE DISTRICT COURT’S FINDING THAT ONE OF THE PATENTS WAS ADEQUATELY DESCRIBED, BUT REVERSED THE DISTRICT COURT’S FINDING OF NON-OBVIOUSNESS. Case Name: Nalpropion Pharms., Inc. v. Actavis Labs....more

INO Therapeutics LLC v. Praxair Distribution Inc.

BUT FOR A CLERICAL ERROR TO BE ADDRESSED ON REMAND, THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT AFFIRMS FINDINGS OF INELIGIBLE SUBJECT MATTER AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. Case Name: INO Therapeutics LLC v. Praxair Distribution Inc., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS...more

Amgen Inc. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC

The Court Denied Defendant’s Motion To Enforce Its Settlement Agreement With Plaintiff After The At-risk Launch And Subsequent Settlement Of Another Defendant. ...more

184 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 8

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide