Download PDF Last year the California Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 257, with a declared purpose of improving the terms and conditions of employment of fast food workers who, according to the bill, “are the largest and...more
Past and present franchisees of commercial cleaning service franchisor, Jani-King, brought claims for violation of Connecticut minimum wage and anti-kickback laws, and unjust enrichment. They claimed Jani-King misclassified...more
11/1/2021
/ Appeals ,
Dismissals ,
Franchise Agreements ,
Franchisee ,
Franchises ,
Independent Contractors ,
Minimum Wage ,
Misclassification ,
Service Agreements ,
Summary Judgment ,
Unjust Enrichment ,
Wage and Hour
The Ninth Circuit ruled that a California Matco Tool franchisee, John Fleming, could bring a class action wage and hour suit in California, even though a forum selection clause in the distribution agreement specified Ohio...more
2/3/2020
/ Anti-Waiver Provisions ,
Appeals ,
Arbitration Agreements ,
Class Action ,
Forum Selection ,
Franchise Agreements ,
Franchise Laws ,
Franchisee ,
Franchisors ,
Independent Contractors ,
Misclassification ,
Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) ,
Sales & Distribution Agreements ,
Severability Doctrine ,
State Labor Laws ,
Wage and Hour
The Ninth Circuit sent shockwaves through the franchise industry in ruling that last year’s California Supreme Court decision broadening who may bring wage misclassification claims (Dynamex v. Superior Court) applied...more
6/1/2019
/ ABC Test ,
Appeals ,
CA Supreme Court ,
Employer Liability Issues ,
Franchisee ,
Franchises ,
Franchisors ,
Indemnification ,
Independent Contractors ,
Joint Employers ,
Misclassification ,
Remand ,
Retroactive Application ,
Reversal ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Wage and Hour
Employees of a Merry Maids home cleaning franchise brought a class action against the franchisee, the franchisor, its owner and affiliated entities claiming they were joint employers. A California federal district court...more
3/2/2019
/ Agency Relationship ,
Class Action ,
Employee Handbooks ,
Franchise Agreements ,
Franchisee ,
Franchises ,
Franchisors ,
Genuine Issue of Material Fact ,
Joint Employers ,
Labor Law Violations ,
Minimum Wage ,
Reasonable Belief Test ,
Right to Control ,
State Labor Laws ,
Summary Judgment ,
Unpaid Overtime ,
Unpaid Wages ,
Wage and Hour
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld summary judgment in favor of Taco Bell on class claims that employees should be paid under California law for time spent on company premises eating employer-discounted meals during...more
8/24/2018
/ Appeals ,
Class Action ,
Employment Policies ,
Franchisee ,
Franchises ,
Reaffirmation ,
Rest and Meal Break ,
State Labor Laws ,
Summary Judgment ,
Taco Bell ,
Wage and Hour
In Curry v. Equilon Enterprises LLC, a California court ruled, and the Court of Appeal affirmed, that a class-action wage and hour lawsuit against Shell Oil could not go forward because the service station manager bringing...more
In Los Angeles Superior Court, McDonald's claimed victory when 6,600 workers seeking $41 million in back pay and penalties came away with less than 2% of the amount sought in a claim that the fast-food giant cheated them out...more
A California federal judge dealt a major blow to employees of a Bay Area McDonald's in their effort to hold the franchisor responsible for its franchisee's alleged failure to pay wages and provide meal and rest breaks. The...more