News & Analysis as of

McDonalds

Lathrop GPM

Is Your Supply Chain Tidy?

Lathrop GPM on

Last week, McDonald’s found itself in the national spotlight. However, instead of highlighting a holiday McFlurry, the hamburger giant was linked to an E. coli outbreak that spread across 13 states and caused approximately 75...more

AEON Law

Patent Poetry: What does copyright law have to do with McDonalds ice cream machines?

AEON Law on

The US Copyright Office has granted a copyright exemption giving restaurants the right to repair broken equipment by bypassing locks intended to prevent anyone other than the manufacturer from repairing them. This...more

Thomas Fox - Compliance Evangelist

TD Bank, Part 7-Caremark Claims-Officers

Next, I explore the TD Bank AML/BSA enforcement action by looking at the expansion of the Caremark Doctrine. In the McDonald’s case, the Delaware Court of Chancery took the Caremark Doctrine further by applying the Duty of...more

Barnea Jaffa Lande & Co.

Using a Name without Permission: Privacy Infringement

About two years ago, McDonald’s advertised a sale on family-sized containers of ice cream called “Blast Ice Cream” in Israel. The advertisement’s headline was “Maayan will be happy to hear… Blast Party: Blast Ice Cream in a...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

SCOTUS Denies Petition to Review McDonald’s No Poach Lawsuit

On March 18, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States (the “Supreme Court”) denied a petition for writ of certiorari brought by McDonald’s USA, LLC (“McDonald’s”). McDonald’s had asked the Supreme Court to review a...more

Lathrop GPM

Kentucky Federal Court Questions Proposed $5 Million Settlement in Anti-poaching Class Action

Lathrop GPM on

Refusing to rubber-stamp a proposed $5 million anti-poaching class action settlement, a federal court in Kentucky has directed the plaintiff to provide additional information to allow proper consideration of the factors...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Court Dismisses Burger-Size Advertising Claims Against McDonald’s, Wendy’s

A federal court in New York has thrown out a proposed class action claiming that McDonald’s and Wendy’s advertisements overstate the toppings and hamburger patty size compared to the products that customers receive. Chimienti...more

Troutman Pepper

Seventh Circuit Revives McDonald's Employee No-Poach Litigation

Troutman Pepper on

In June of 2022, McDonald’s obtained a judgment on the pleadings, ending antitrust litigation challenging the legality of the no-hire restraints it previously included in its franchise agreements. More than a year later, the...more

Lathrop GPM

Seventh Circuit Reverses Dismissal of Anti-Poaching Class Action Against McDonald’s

Lathrop GPM on

In an important case of first impression that drew amicus participation from the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, and the International Franchise Association, the Seventh Circuit reversed a judgment in...more

Quarles & Brady LLP

Seventh Circuit Rejects Dismissal of Franchisee No-Poach Clause Challenge

Quarles & Brady LLP on

In Deslandes v. McDonald’s USA LLC, issued August 25, 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned the dismissal of antitrust claims that challenged no-poach clauses in franchise agreements....more

Vinson & Elkins LLP

Seventh Circuit Revives Former McDonald’s Workers’ No-Poach Suit

Vinson & Elkins LLP on

An important federal appeals court has clarified a key principle of antitrust law in a way that potentially makes it more difficult for an employer to win a motion to dismiss, and thereby avoid expensive discovery, with...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

The Justice Insiders Podcast: Meet the Securities and Exchange (and Human Resources) Commission

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Host Gregg N. Sofer is joined by Husch Blackwell senior associate Rebecca Furdek to discuss the recently concluded Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement action concerning McDonald’s and its former CEO Stephen...more

Allen Matkins

Will Corporate DEI Efforts Engender Caremark Claims?

Allen Matkins on

In a posting on the Business Law Prof Blog, Professor Stefan J. Padfield recently highlighted a complaint filed by America First Legal Foundation with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.  The complaint alleges...more

Goodwin

Court Denies Dapper Labs’ Motion to Dismiss, Finding That NFTs May Be Securities

Goodwin on

On February 22, 2023, U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York denied a motion to dismiss a putative class action brought by purchasers of a non-fungible token (NFT) against Dapper Labs, Inc....more

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

Delaware’s Duty of Oversight Applies to Corporate Officers

In a recent decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery determined for the first time that corporate officers owe a duty of oversight under Delaware Law. The case, In re McDonald’s Corporation Stockholder Derivative Litigation,...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Court of Chancery Dismisses Claims Against McDonald’s Corp. Directors

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The Court of Chancery recently dismissed claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the duty of oversight, and waste against the board of directors of McDonald’s Corporation. In In re McDonald’s Corp. Stockholder...more

Goodwin

McDonald’s Part Two: Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Caremark Claims Against Directors Arising From Sexual Harassment Issues

Goodwin on

On March 1, 2023, in In re McDonald’s Corporation Stockholder Derivative Litigation, Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of Delaware’s Court of Chancery granted a motion to dismiss derivative claims against McDonald’s directors...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Delaware Court Confirms Corporate Officers’ Duty of Oversight - Lessons for UK Companies

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The US decision reminds UK companies and their officers to identify and report red flags about misconduct in the workplace. Certain shareholders of McDonald’s Corporation (the Company) sued David Fairhurst, the Company’s...more

Polsinelli

Delaware Court of Chancery Establishes Duty of Oversight Extends to Officers

Polsinelli on

In a significant and far-reaching development in Delaware corporate law, the Delaware Court of Chancery recently held in In re McDonald’s Corporation Stockholder Derivative Litigation, C.A. No. 2021-0324-JTL (Del. Ch. Jan....more

Woodruff Sawyer

McDonald’s Litigation Expands Caremark and Loyalty Claims to Officers

Woodruff Sawyer on

Since the “Blue Bell Creameries” case in 2019, directors have been justifiably concerned about the rise in popularity of Caremark claims (breaching the duty of oversight in a way that implicates the duty of loyalty)....more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Corporate Director Duty to at Least “Try” to Carry Out Oversight Functions May Soon Extend to Company Officers

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Just last year, in assessing the extent to which a director has a duty to oversee a corporation’s business affairs, the Business Court noted the “limited guidance” afforded by state statutes and case law. In Lee v. McDowell,...more

Akerman LLP

Delaware Court of Chancery Extends Oversight Obligations to Non-Director Corporate Officers

Akerman LLP on

In former Chancellor Allen’s hallmark decision in In re Caremark International, Inc. Derivative Litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery held that directors of a corporation owe stockholders the fiduciary duty of oversight....more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Top 5 SEC Enforcement Developments for January 2023

In order to provide an overview for busy in-house counsel and compliance professionals, we summarize below some of the most important SEC enforcement developments from the past month, with links to primary resources. This...more

The Volkov Law Group

Delaware Court Extends Caremark Duty of Oversight to Senior Officers

The Volkov Law Group on

In a far-reaching decision with significant implications, the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a decision confirming that Caremark duty of oversight obligations extends to senior officers.  This will have an immediate...more

Sherman & Howard L.L.C.

Officers Held Liable for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim Brought Against Them by Stockholders

Earlier this year, we wrote about Delaware’s recent statutory changes extending certain protections to corporate officers that were previously only afforded to directors. As we mentioned in that advisory, an exception to the...more

245 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 10

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide