On May 9, 2025, the Supreme Court of Texas reversed an appellate court’s decision in Pohl v. Cheatham. The case involves two Texas-based attorneys, Michael Pohl and Robert Ammons, who solicited out-of-state clients with...more
6/24/2025
/ Appeals ,
Car Accident ,
Client Services ,
Jurisdiction ,
Legal Ethics ,
Legal Project Management ,
Marketing ,
Solicitation ,
Statute of Limitations ,
Texas ,
TX Supreme Court
As the “AI Revolution” continues to gain momentum, questions concerning professional ethics have arisen across almost all professions. For legal services providers in particular, this disruptive technology poses both risks...more
8/21/2024
/ American Bar Association (ABA) ,
Artificial Intelligence ,
Client Communication ,
Confidential Information ,
Document Review ,
Governance Standards ,
Law Practice Management ,
Legal Ethics ,
Legal Project Management ,
Legal Research ,
Legal Technology ,
Machine Learning ,
Professional Responsibility ,
Risk Assessment ,
Technology-Assisted Review ,
Young Lawyers
At the risk of stating the obvious, we are still in the early days of what we believe to be an “AI Revolution” in the way that goods and services, including legal services, are and will be provided. That means that we do not,...more
7/26/2024
/ Artificial Intelligence ,
Attorney-Client Privilege ,
Authorship ,
Client Representation ,
Confidential Information ,
Copyright ,
Data Breach ,
Data Collection ,
Data Preservation ,
Document Review ,
Ethics ,
False Statements ,
Innovative Technology ,
Law Firm Ownership ,
Legal Ethics ,
Legal Project Management ,
Legal Research ,
Legal Technology ,
Machine Learning ,
Privileged Communication ,
Risk Mitigation ,
Rules of Professional Conduct ,
Technology-Assisted Review