Where an alleged infringer administers a substance A to a subject, and the substance is subsequently transformed to a therapeutic agent X inside the subject’s body, does the administration of the substance A constitute an act...more
On May 19, 2023, the Supreme Court in Amgen v. Sanofi, No. 21-757, unanimously held that the claims of two Amgen patents, both directed to a genus of potentially millions of antibodies, are invalid because the patents failed...more
On December 16, 2019, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion that fully upheld the District of Delaware’s denial of Hospira, Inc.’s motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL), or alternative motion...more
On December 10, 2019, an agreement was reached between the United States, Mexico, and Canada on amendments to the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”). The USMCA, if ratified by each respective country, would replace the...more
12/18/2019
/ Biologics ,
Biotechnology ,
BPCIA ,
Copyright ,
Exclusivity ,
Exclusivity Rule ,
Foreign Entities ,
Intellectual Property Protection ,
NAFTA ,
Patent Term Extensions ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Safe Harbors ,
Trade Associations ,
Trade Relations ,
United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)
In an opinion issued on December 14, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the 2010 Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) preempts the use of state law to penalize...more
12/19/2017
/ aBLA ,
Biologics ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
IP License ,
Notice Requirements ,
Patent Dance ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Sandoz v Amgen ,
SCOTUS ,
State Law Claims ,
Unfair Competition
In a nonprecedential opinion issued on November 13, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court finding that Apotex’s aBLAs for biosimilar versions of Neulasta® and Neupogen® did...more
11/20/2017
/ Amgen ,
Appeals ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Patent Dance ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Pharmaceutical Patents ,
Witness Statements
On April 26, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in the much-anticipated Amgen v. Sandoz case, representing the first time the Court has had to grapple with the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act...more
On July 5, the Federal Circuit issued another important decision regarding the meaning of certain provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). See Amgen Inc. v. Apotex Inc., Fed. Cir. Case No....more
7/6/2016
/ Amgen ,
Apotex ,
Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Commercial Marketing ,
FDA Approval ,
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ,
Generic Drugs ,
Notice Requirements ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Sandoz ,
Sandoz v Amgen
On July 21, 2015, the Federal Circuit issued a key decision regarding the meaning of various provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). See Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., Fed. Cir. Case No....more
7/23/2015
/ Amgen ,
Biosimilars ,
BPCIA ,
Disclosure Requirements ,
FDA Approval ,
Patent Infringement ,
Patent Litigation ,
Patents ,
Pharmaceutical Industry ,
Prescription Drugs ,
Sandoz ,
Sandoz v Amgen
Yesterday, a Federal Circuit panel comprising Judges Newman, Lourie, and Chen heard oral argument in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. (Fed. Cir. No. 2015-1499), the first ever case requiring the Appeals Court to address the meaning...more
In an order released on March 19, 2015, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Seeborg of the Northern District of California denied Amgen’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as well as its request for a preliminary injunction...more