CFPB Announces Crackdown on ‘In-House’ Loan Programs Offered by Colleges and Universities

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

On January 20, 2022, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced that it will examine postsecondary schools’ “in-house” lending practices (the Announcement). The Announcement highlights the CFPB’s intent to focus on schools’ debt collection practices, such as withholding transcripts from delinquent borrowers, and whether the schools maintain “preferential relationships” with certain student loan lenders in light of requirements in the early 2000s after “many lenders and institutions of higher education were caught engaging in kickback arrangements that gave schools the incentive to steer students into certain loans.”
Significantly, the CFPB published a revised set of examination procedures describing how it will examine student loan providers, including schools that offer institutional loans. The updated exam procedures note the CFPB’s position that “[p]rivate education loans sometimes take non-traditional forms such as temporary credits and income share agreements.”

Prior to joining the CFPB, Director Rohit Chopra was vocally concerned about the rise of alternative education finance products such as Income Share Agreements (ISAs). The CFPB recently entered into a consent order with an ISA provider in which it asserted that ISAs are loans, a legal conclusion that is disputed by the nascent ISA industry. The CFPB’s new examination procedures further confirm the CFPB’s position in this regard.

The examination procedures ask examiners to “[d]etermine whether a supervised entity uses payment plans or temporary credits for all or any portion of its programs.” So-called “payment plans” that involve deferral of a consumer’s payment obligation and may constitute private education loans subject the education provider to the CFPB’s oversight as well as various state laws relating to retail installment sales, debt collection and student loan servicing. 

Post-secondary educational institutions should review their payment policies to validate that they have appropriate policies and procedures with respect to any tuition payment deferrals, as well as their debt collection and other transcript withholding policies.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.