Extracting slavery reparations from private interests: Laches and other such equitable defenses

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School
Contact

See generally Charles E. Rounds, Jr. Proponents of Extracting Slavery Reparations from Private Interests Must Contend with Equity’s Maxims, 42 Toledo Law Rev. 673 (2011). A link to the article accompanies this posting. While the article does not get into slavery-reparation claims against the sovereign, it is likely that overcoming the statutory obstacles to eligibility for taxpayer-funded slavery reparations would prove as daunting as overcoming the equitable obstacles to a judicial finding of liability has proved to be for those endeavoring to extract slavery reparations from private interests. While Congress does not answer to equity, it would likely have no choice but to apply, whether consciously or unconsciously, longstanding equitable principles when sorting out who on policy grounds should be eligible for taxpayer-funded slavery reparations and who should not be eligible, so much time having elapsed since slavery was abolished

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School
Contact
more
less

Charles E. Rounds, Jr. - Suffolk University Law School on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide