Funny You Should Ask: Employer Considerations For Rehiring Employees

Husch Blackwell LLP
Contact

As more businesses begin to reintegrate employees into their pre-pandemic workplaces, many of our clients have questions regarding return-to-work issues. In this edition of Funny You Should Ask, we address three questions many of our clients have asked during the past few weeks. The answers below focus on compliance with federal law. As always, employers will need to take state and local laws into consideration in addition to federal law.

1. We furloughed, then terminated employees due to the economic impact of the pandemic back in Spring 2020. We eliminated some positions, but now have a business need to recreate those positions. Frankly, we don’t want to rehire the previous employee who used to hold the position. Are we obligated to hire them back and, if not, what steps can we take to best protect ourselves against a claim?

No employer is obligated to re-hire an individual who had previously been employed with the organization, subject to any union collective bargaining agreement. If there is a legitimate business need to reestablish a position or multiple positions, document that legitimate business need internally through some kind of memorandum, e-mail or other note to a file. If the business need is legitimate, move forward with it!

You can treat any past employees, even those who previously held the position, in the same manner as any new applicant for the position. There is no need to make a special effort to make past employees aware of job openings, even if the opening is the position that individual had previously held.

If there are legitimate performance concerns from the past period of employment, it is perfectly fine to take those performance concerns from prior employment into consideration as part of this new hiring process.

Like any business decision, document the legitimate reasons for making the selection of one candidate over another candidate. If the individual who had previously held the position is not the best candidate for the position, do not hire them. If that individual complains formally or informally, your organization can rely on the legitimate business reasons that you have documented for the decision.

2. We are excited to be hiring again, but are finding more and more candidates have non-compete or other restrictive covenants in place with their current employer. What do we need to be cognizant of as we manage through a potential relationship with a candidate with a non-compete restriction?

As an initial matter, it is important to remember that non-compete restrictions and other restrictive covenants (such as employee non-solicitation restrictions) are governed by state law. In theory, and often in practice, a new employer of an individual subject to non-compete restrictions could be threatened with a “tortious interference with contract” claim. This theory is based on the idea that by employing the individual in violation of their non-compete restriction, the new employer is interfering with the old employer’s contract – the contract not to compete. Businesses are wise to carefully manage an applicant with non-compete restrictions from a prior employer.

First, employers should ask for a copy of any restrictions. Additionally, employers should obtain some representation from candidates that the candidate has made the prospective employer aware of any non-compete or other restrictive covenant restrictions. This can be done in an offer letter, an employment agreement or a simple written communication.

Then the determining factor is whether the non-compete restrictions can be enforced under applicable state law. Some states make it difficult for employers to enforce non-compete restrictions. Other states allow for courts to modify any overly broad restrictions to make them reasonable and enforceable.

One other thought to keep in mind:  it is easy for a former employer to send a nasty cease-and-desist letter threatening legal action. It is an entirely different level of cost and angst to actually sue a former employee for an alleged breach. Former employers often suspect the cost of the legal defense for that former employee will be paid by the new employer, which makes them carefully consider whether they want to initiate formal litigation in a public forum.

Given all the nuance and strategy, the value of legal counsel in these situations is significant.

3. We need to refill positions, and have offered jobs to some employees who were on the lower end of the wage scale, but they are non-responsive or say they do not want to work yet. We suspect that the employees are making more money on unemployment than they would make working for us. What do we do?

 This is a reality of the current job market, and this issue is generating more attention in mainstream media as of late. With federal enhancements to the unemployment insurance payments, some individuals have concluded that they are better off on unemployment than in a regular paying job. Others still have legitimate concerns related to safety during the pandemic.

For employers, it is best to document that the individual has been made aware of the job opportunity and/or the offer of employment.

In order to maintain the relationship with the individual—who is a prospective future employee—it may be best to maintain communication with the employee until the federal enhancements expire and pandemic eases, at which time the individual may be interested in returning to the workplace.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Husch Blackwell LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Husch Blackwell LLP
Contact
more
less

Husch Blackwell LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.