Top 10 New York Commercial Division Cases and Developments of 2017

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact

In 2017, the New York Commercial Division continued to implement new rules and refine existing rules in order to streamline litigation in the court.  The year also saw some key decisions by the Commercial Division as well as appellate courts reviewing Commercial Division cases that developed an area of commercial law or applied existing law to a new or interesting set of facts.  We covered all of these developments in this blog.  We present here brief summaries of the most salient Commercial Division rule changes and cases from 2017 with links to our blog posts that provide more in-depth coverage.

1. Rushaid, et al. v. Pictet & Cie, et al. (Analyzing Personal Jurisdiction Based on Repeated and Deliberate Use of Correspondent Bank Accounts)

In Rushaid, et al. v. Pictet & Cie, et al.,[1] New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals (overturning decisions of both the Appellate Division and the Commercial Division) ruled that a foreign bank’s “repeated, deliberate” use of correspondent bank accounts in the United States is enough to establish New York jurisdiction.  Historically, a foreign bank’s use of correspondent bank accounts in the United States to facilitate wire transfers has not necessarily given New York courts a sufficient basis for jurisdiction over the bank.

In deciding to exercise jurisdiction, the Court of Appeals applied a two-pronged test of: (1) whether defendants purposefully availed themselves of conducting business in New York and (2) whether there was a substantial relationship between the transaction and the claim asserted.  As to the first prong, the court reasoned that Pictet’s use of a New York correspondent account similarly reflected a “repeated, deliberate use that is approved by the foreign bank on behalf of and for the benefit of a customer,” which “demonstrates volitional activity constituting transaction of business.”  As to the second prong, the court found that there was a “substantial nexus” between the transaction in question and the claim asserted. Disposing of defendants’ assertions that the use of New York bank accounts was “incidental” to the scheme, the court concluded that the complaint “easily” satisfied the nexus requirement.  The court reasoned that since the money laundering could not have proceeded without the use of the New York correspondent bank accounts and since the money laundering was essential to plaintiffs’ claims, there was a sufficient nexus between the business conducted in New York and the claims being asserted.

For more coverage of this case, see [link].

2. Davis v. Scottish Re Group Ltd (Analyzing Rule 12A of the Rules of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands)

In Davis v. Scottish Re Group Ltd,[2] the New York Court of Appeals held that Rule 12A of the Rules of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands – which requires plaintiffs in a derivative suit to obtain leave of court based on a prima facie factual showing before proceeding – does not apply to claims litigated in New York courts.  The Court of Appeals determined that Rule 12A is procedural rather than substantive, and thus should not be applied in New York under New York’s choice-of-law framework.  The Court rejected the argument that Rule 12A is a substantive component of Cayman Islands corporate law because the rule “neither creates a right, nor defeats it,” but rather establishes the procedure by which a plaintiff must proceed in Cayman Islands courts.

In analyzing the proper classification of Rule 12A, the Court of Appeals identified four major indications that the rule is procedural.  First, the rule applies to actions initiated by procedures that are unique to Cayman Islands courts.  Second, the rule applies to all derivative claims litigated in Cayman Islands courts, not only to those involving Cayman corporations.  Third, the Court noted that the drafters of Rule 12A could have expressly provided, but did not provide, that the rule applied to all derivative claims involving Cayman Islands corporations, regardless of forum.  Finally, the Court of Appeals noted that enforcing Rule 12A in New York courts would raise several procedural ambiguities surrounding the process for obtaining leave from a Cayman Islands court before proceeding in New York.  Following this decision, there still remain barriers to bringing Cayman-related derivative suits in New York courts – such as establishing standing under Cayman Islands common law – but plaintiffs will no longer have to make the factual showing required by Rule 12A before proceeding with their claims.

For more coverage of this rule change, see [link].

3. Good Hill Master Fund L.P. v. Deutsche Bank AG (Analyzing Bad Faith Claim Involving Credit Default Swaps)

In Good Hill Master Fund L.P. v. Deutsche Bank AG,[3] the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed a judgment entered in the Commercial Division of over $90 million, a large portion of which included prejudgment interest at 21%.  The judgment followed a nonjury trial before the Commercial Division.  The case was brought by two hedge funds against Deutsche Bank in connection with Credit Default Swap (“CDS”) agreements.  The First Department rejected the bank’s arguments that the hedge funds acted in bad faith by renegotiating the terms of the underlying securitized notes to the detriment of their CDS counterparty, Deutsche Bank.

As to the claim of bad faith, the court affirmed the Commercial Division’s finding that “Good Hill negotiated at arm’s length with Bank of America” and that Bank of America was free to accept or reject the allocation of the purchase price to the investment grade notes.  The First Department further concluded that Good Hill had not violated any of the CDS governing agreements.  The court noted that pursuant to the governing agreements, Good Hill could “pursue its own interests, even if it might have an adverse effect on [Deutsche Bank].”  The decision is important because the court held that Good Hill could negotiate aggressively and pursue its own interests, even to the detriment of its CDS counterparty.

For more coverage of this case, see [link].

4. Gordon v. Verizon Communications, Inc. (Appellate Division Adds Additional Factors to be Considered in Approving Class Action Settlements)

On February 2, 2017, the Appellate Division issued a unanimous decision in Gordon v. Verizon Communications, Inc. that may have significant consequences for non-monetary settlements of shareholder class actions in New York.[4]  The Commercial Division rejected the putative settlement due to concerns about whether shareholders could benefit from the additional disclosures that were to be made.  The First Department reversed and approved the proposed settlement.  The court applied the five-factor test that the Appellate Division had adopted in Matter of Colt Indus. Shareholders Litig. (Woodrow v. Colt Indus, Inc.), 155 AD2d 154, 160 (1st Dep’t 1990), and added two new factors to that test.  However, the court’s failure to clearly define which parties these two new factors are meant to protect—i.e., the shareholders or the corporation—may lead to confusion as future courts and parties seek to apply this revised standard.

The two factors added by the court are:  whether the agreement is in the best interests of the members of the putative class of shareholders and whether the proposed settlement is in the best interests of the corporation.  The First Department’s holding could usher in a new approach to reviewing non-monetary settlements of shareholder class actions.  However, the lack of clarity between the best interests of the shareholders as opposed to the corporations may lead to some confusion as parties seek to craft settlement agreements that will withstand scrutiny under the First Department’s expanded Colt factors.  It remains to be seen whether the Gordon decision will encourage more merger challenges to be filed in New York—as opposed to Delaware.

For more coverage of this case, see [link].

5. LNYC Loft, LLC v. Hudson Opportunity Fund I, LLC (Analyzing Appointment of Special Litigation Committee under LLC Operating Agreement)

In NYC Loft, LLC v. Hudson Opportunity Fund I, LLC,[5] the First Department endorsed the practice of the appointment of a Special Litigation Committee (SLC) by a limited liability company (LLC) “at least where explicitly contemplated” by the LLC’s operating agreement.  However, where the operating agreement does not explicitly provide for such an appointment or otherwise evince an intent to delegate core governance functions to a nonmember, the LLC cannot appoint an SLC that has authority over a major decision of the LLC.

In reaching its decision, the court found that LLCs are “creatures of contract.”  It further noted that “[o]ne attraction of the LLC form of entity is the statutory freedom granted to members to shape, by contract, their own approach to common business relationship problems.”  The court also recognized that “Article IV of the New York LLC Act makes clear that the operating agreement of an LLC governs the relationship among members and the powers and authority of the members and manager.”  Based on this, the court found that where an operating agreement does not provide for delegation of decision-making authority to someone other than a member—e.g., an SLC—the court found the appointment of the SLC to be improper.  However, the court also stressed that its decision does not mean “that the appointment of an SLC would in all cases be improper in the LLC context.”  It noted that where an operating agreement allows for the appointment of an SLC, the court would enforce such an arrangement “in accordance with the same principles concerning the parties’ freedom to contract.”

For more coverage of this case, see [link].

6. Fidilio v. Hoosick Falls Productions, Inc. (Interpreting Arbitration Clause in Related Agreement)

In Fidilio v. Hoosick Falls Productions, Inc.,[6] the Commercial Division granted a motion to compel arbitration of a dispute relating to a short-lived reality TV show, Scrappers.  The Commercial Division ruled that the arbitration clause in one agreement between Frank Fidilio, the show's creator, and Hoosick Falls Production, Inc. (“Hoosick”), the production company, required arbitration of Fidilio's claims against Hoosick brought under another agreement which was executed at the same time, by the same parties, governing the same subject matter.

The Commercial Division found that “[i]n the absence of anything to indicate a contrary intention, instruments executed at the same time, by the same parties, for the same purpose, and in the course of the same transaction [shall] be read and interpreted together[,] it being said that they are, in the eye of the law, one instrument.”  The court observed that a reference to the Participant Agreement in the Producer Agreement evinced “the intent of the agreements . . . to be read together.”  With respect to transactions, the case highlights the importance of clarity when drafting arbitration clauses.  Particularly where a transaction may involve multiple related agreements, parties should consider expressly setting forth the reach of an arbitration clause to avoid later disputes.

For more coverage of this case, see [link].

7. Ace Decade Holdings Ltd. v. UBS AG (Analyzing Personal Jurisdiction Over Financing Deal Negotiated in Hong Kong)

In Ace Decade Holdings Ltd. v. UBS AG,[7] New York’s Commercial Division dismissed a $500 million fraud suit brought by an investment holding company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, Ace Decade Holdings Ltd. (“Ace Decade”), against the Swiss bank, UBS AG, for lack of personal jurisdiction and inconvenient forum. The Commercial Division found no basis to exercise jurisdiction over UBS for alleged fraud in connection with a financing deal negotiated in Hong Kong to purchase shares of a firm listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The Commercial Division further held that, even if the court could exercise jurisdiction over UBS, the causes of action lacked a substantial nexus with New York and, thus, dismissal was also warranted based upon the doctrine of forum non conveniens.

As to the personal jurisdiction analysis, the Commercial Division found that based on the “totality of the circumstances,” there was not a “substantial relationship” between the causes of action and any transaction by defendant in New York.  The court reasoned that “the complaint describes a purchase by a British Virgin Islands company (Ace Decade) through a Chinese investment fund, of Shares regulated by Chinese law, denominated in Hong Kong Dollars and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.” Ace Decade’s relocation to New York before the investment was funded did not trigger long-arm jurisdiction, because UBS’s telephone and email communications to Ace Decade in New York “are not enough to exercise long-arm jurisdiction with respect to claims arising out of an entirely foreign transaction.”  The court also dismissed the case on forum non conveniens grounds because China’s and Hong Kong’s interests in the lawsuit were greater than New York’s interest, and all relevant documents and witnesses were in Hong Kong.

For more coverage of this case, see [link].

8. K9 Bytes, Inc. v. Arch Capital Funding, LLC (Analyzing Application of Usury Laws to Working Capital Agreements)

In K9 Bytes, Inc. v. Arch Capital Funding, LLC,[8] the Commercial Division addressed whether a working capital agreement is a loan and therefore subject to usury laws.  The court found that the answer depends on the type of claim that the Plaintiff has brought.  In the context of a misrepresentation claim, the court determined that if a contract expressly purports not to be a lending agreement, plaintiffs cannot allege that they were misled because they thought they were indeed entering a lending agreement.  The court reached a different result with respect to whether usury laws apply to the agreement. There, the court determined that it must look to the substantive provisions of the agreement to determine whether as a matter of law such an agreement is subject to usury laws.

For more coverage of this case, see [link].

9. New York Commercial Division Adopts Large Complex Case List Pilot Program

On October 23, 2017, the New York’s Chief Administrative Judge adopted the Large Complex Case List as a pilot program for the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court of New York County.  Under this pilot procedure, a Commercial Division justice may designate a case for the Large Complex Case List, either sua sponte or by application of a party, if the case “addresses commercial claims for an amount no less than $50 million” excluding punitive damages, interest, costs, disbursements and counsel fees, or if the case “addresses matters of sufficient complexity and importance to warrant such designation.”  Justices presiding over cases on the Large Complex Case List may require the parties to use hyperlinked briefs and electronic document depositories, and may refer the cases to special referees for discovery matters, special mediators, or settlement judges. The Large Complex Case List will be effective in New York County as of January 1, 2018.  The Large Complex Case List was inspired by the creation of the UK’s “Financial List” designed for cases valued at £50 Million.

For more coverage of this rule change, see [link].

10. New York Commercial Division Adopts New Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules

On October 11, 2017, the Chief Administrative Judge of New York’s Unified Court System amended Rules 10 and 11 of Section 202.70(g) (“Rules of Practice for the Commercial Division”) with respect to Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”).  These amendments focus on providing clients with sufficient information related to mediation and ADR, and setting a proper time frame for identifying a mediator. Both amendments are seen as ways to increase and improve the usage of mediation in the Commercial Division.   Rule 10 now requires counsel to file a certification relating to ADR at the preliminary conference and each subsequent compliance or status conference.  The amended rule requires counsel for each party to certify, “that counsel has discussed with the party the availability of [ADR] mechanisms provided by the Commercial Division and/or private ADR providers, and stating whether the party is presently willing to pursue mediation at some point during the litigation.”  Rule 11 states that where appropriate, a preliminary conference order will contain provisions for the early disposition of a case, including directions for submission to the ADR program.  The amended rule now provides that directions for submission to the ADR program are provided in the preliminary conference order, “including, in all cases in which the parties certify their willingness to pursue mediation pursuant to Rule 10, provision of a specific date by which a mediator shall be identified by the parties for assistance with resolution of the action.” 

The amendments were first proposed by the Commercial Division Advisory Council. After public comment, they were adopted by the Unified Court System's Administrative Board.  These amended rules are set to take effect on January 1, 2018.

For more coverage of this rule change, see [link].

 


[1] No. 180, 2016 BL 387923 (N.Y. Nov. 22, 2016).

[2] No. 111, 2017 NY Slip Op. 08157, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 3277 (Nov. 20, 2017).

[3] No. 600858/10-2188B, 2017 BL 19363 (App. Div. 1st Dep’t Jan. 24, 2017).

[4] No. 653084/13, 2017 BL 31251 (1st Dep’t Feb. 2, 2017).

[5] No. 650969/11, 4096, 2017 N.Y. App. Div. Lexis 6108, at *2 (1st Dep’t Aug. 15, 2017).

[6] No. 654066/2016, 2017 BL 107640 (Sup. Ct. Mar. 22, 2017).

[7] No. 653316/2015, 2016 BL 413780 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Dec. 7, 2016).

[8] No. 54755/16, 2017 NY Slip Op 30954(U), 2017 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1743 (Sup. Ct. Westchester Cty. May 4).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact
more
less

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.