DOL Issues Proposed Rule to Rescind 2011 Regulations that Impose Tip-Sharing Restrictions on Employers that Pay the Full Federal Minimum Wage to Employees

by Littler


The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has issued a proposed rule to rescind the Department’s position that employers must comply with tip-pooling requirements even when paying the full minimum wage.  This proposal, if finalized, would allow employers that pay employees at least the full federal minimum wage to require employees to share tips with employees who are not otherwise customarily tipped, such as cooks, dishwashers, porters and maintenance staff.  This rule would not affect employers that apply a tip credit towards employees’ wages. 


In 1966, Congress enacted an amendment to the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) that permitted employers to utilize tips received by employees as a credit against part of the employer’s minimum wage obligations.  In 1974, Congress passed another amendment to the FLSA that conditioned an employer’s ability to use this “tip credit” by requiring that an employer inform its employees of the provisions of the FLSA’s tip credit provision and requiring that employees retain all tips, except that tip pooling among customarily and regularly tipped employees was permitted.  

In 2011, the DOL amended FLSA regulations to reflect its view at the time that the tip-pooling requirements apply to all employees receiving tips, even if the employer paid an employee at or above minimum wage, and did not take a tip credit against the minimum wage paid to employees.  On December 4, 2017, the DOL published a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) that would rescind these portions of the 2011 tip regulations. 

New Proposed Rule

The DOL noted that it was motivated by several factors to issue the NPRM.  First and foremost, the DOL believes it is not authorized to issue a regulation that affects employers that do not apply a tip credit, and therefore acted beyond its authority in promulgating the 2011 regulation.  Indeed, the DOL stated, “[t]he Department has serious concerns that it incorrectly construed the [FLSA] in promulgating its current regulations, the scope of which extends to employers that have paid the full Federal minimum wage to their tipped employees, particularly insofar as those employers, rather than taking tips for their own purposes, provide for such tips to be shared with other employees through a tip pool.”

Second, the DOL indicated that a motivating factor behind the NPRM was to provide clarity for the significant amount of private litigation involving assertions of improper tip pooling and tip-retention practices of employers that pay a direct cash wage of at least the federal minimum wage and do not take a tip credit.1  In addition to the increase in litigation, the DOL noted that in 2011, when it promulgated its most recent tip-pooling regulations, approximately 17% of the states had laws that required employers to pay employees a direct cash wage that exceeded the full federal minimum wage. As of December 2017, that number has almost doubled and approximately 31% of the states require employers to pay employees a direct cash wage that exceeds the full federal minimum wage.  In light of this “changed landscape and extensive litigation,” the DOL found it incumbent to issue a retraction of a regulation it now deems to improperly construe the FLSA. 

The DOL is inviting the public to submit comments, which should include supporting data whenever possible, on the proposed rescission of the 2011 tip regulations that apply to employers that pay tipped employees a direct cash wage that is equal to or in excess of the federal minimum wage and that do not claim a tip credit.  Specifically, the DOL has solicited feedback regarding the following issues: 

  1. Among employers that currently pay a direct cash wage of at least the federal minimum wage and do not take a tip credit, what portion reallocate tips with other employees? And, among that population of employers, what portion of the total tips do they retain or reallocate?
  2. How prevalent are employer-required, or mandatory, tip pools? What factors determine whether an employer institutes a mandatory tip pool? What portion of the tips received by employees do employers anticipate being contributed to the tip pool? What kinds of factors might influence an employer’s decision to exclude some tips from inclusion in a mandatory tip pool?
  3. Do tipped employees receiving money from a mandatory tip pool typically receive a fixed dollar amount, or a fixed percentage of the pool? Is it common for some employees to receive a larger share of the tip pool than others, or are tips typically distributed on an even basis among all participants in the tip pool?
  4. If this proposed rule were adopted as proposed, what kinds of employees would employers choose to include in mandatory tip pools?
  5. If this proposed rule were adopted as proposed, would customers’ tipping practices change?
  6. If this proposed rule were adopted as proposed, would some employers respond by reallocating tipped income to their non-tipped employees? Would such a response reduce the disparity in take-home earnings between tipped and non-tipped employees in service industry establishments?
  7. If this rule were adopted as proposed, what non-regulatory limitations would employers and employees face when deciding whether and how to design a tip-pooling arrangement? Are there any market norms or other behavioral reasons why some types of tip pooling are more prevalent than others? To what extent is the endowment effect (that is, customarily and regularly tipped employees potentially valuing tips more than wages of the same average amount) relevant for explaining potential tip behavior in a relatively less-regulated market?

The DOL also recognized that if employers decide to pay the full FLSA minimum wage without applying a tip credit, they may have cost savings, because they will no longer need to keep the specific records required under 29 CFR 516.28.  On the other hand, the DOL recognized that some employers that choose to change their practices and pay at least the full FLSA minimum wage in cash and not apply a tip credit may incur costs related to revising their employee handbooks, adjusting their payroll systems, and advising affected employees.  Accordingly, the DOL has also solicited feedback to ascertain the cost-benefit thought process employers would undergo if the DOL rescinds the 2011 rule.  

Next Steps

Comments in response to the NPRM are due by January 4, 2018.  In the meantime, employers in states that follow the FLSA should consider the pros and cons of eliminating the tip credit.  In particular, employers should start evaluating whether they can withstand the payroll cost increase from raising front-of-house staff wages to the full federal minimum wage rate and simultaneously lowering back-of-house and other non-regularly tipped employees’ wage rates and by offsetting that reduction by allowing these employees to participate in a tip pool. 

One word of caution: Several states, such as New York, have implemented laws and regulations that outright prohibit the sharing of tips with employees who are not primarily engaged in guest service.  The NPRM will have little effect on employers in these states, so as always, check whether any state of local laws contain more stringent prohibitions.



1 See e.g.Cumbie v. Woody Woo, Inc., 596 F.3d 577 (9th Cir. 2010) and Oregon Rest. & Lodging Ass’n v. Perez, 816 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2016); Trejo v. Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., 795 F.3d 442 (4th Cir. 2015); Marlow v. The New Food Guy, Inc., 861 F.3d 1157 (10th Cir. 2017).


Written by:


Littler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.