News & Analysis as of

Administrative Proceedings Certiorari

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - December 13, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in seven cases: Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine; Danco Laboratories, L.L.C. v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, Nos....more

Troutman Pepper

Supreme Court Review May Prove the Death Knell to SEC Administrative Courts

Troutman Pepper on

On June 30, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in SEC v. Jarkesy, et al. and agreed to hear the case that could potentially end the use of administrative courts and administrative law judges (ALJ) in administrative...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS agrees to hear case involving challenge to the use of administrative law judges by federal agencies

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Last Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the SEC’s petition for certiorari in Jarkesy v. Securities and Exchange Commission, a case in which the respondents are challenging the constitutionality of the SEC’s use of...more

Burr & Forman

The U.S. Supreme Court Granted Certiorari to Determine Whether the CFPB’s Funding Structure Violates the Appropriations Clause of...

Burr & Forman on

On Monday, February 27, the United States Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the case Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd., No. 22-448,...more

Holland & Knight LLP

SEC in Constitutional Danger Zone Following Several Recent Decisions

Holland & Knight LLP on

The constitutional spotlight is shining on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the last several weeks, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case seeking broader federal jurisdiction for constitutional...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Federal Circuit Appeals from the PTAB and ITC: Summaries of Key 2020 Decisions

[co-author: Kathleen Wills] Last year, the global COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for American courts. By making several changes, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was able to...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Federal Circuitry

What Does the Supreme Court’s Grant in Two Social Security Cases Have to Do With Arthrex?

As readers know, we have written about Arthrex a lot.  So what better way to start Monday than another short post?  Today, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Carr v. Saul, No. 19-1442, and Davis v. Saul, No. 20-105—two cases...more

A&O Shearman

Overview Of Cases Of Particular Interest Currently Pending Before The Supreme Court Of The United States

A&O Shearman on

Looking ahead, we preview cases currently pending before the Supreme Court—which have already been accepted for review by the Court—that may be of particular interest to readers of the Need-to-Know Litigation Weekly.  These...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS to consider Collins cert petitions on Jan. 10

Ballard Spahr LLP on

At its conference this Friday, January 10, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to consider the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the plaintiffs in Collins v. Mnuchin and the petition filed by the FHFA and Treasury...more

Burr & Forman

Supreme Court to Decide Whether Structure of the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau is Constitutional

Burr & Forman on

On October 18, 2019, the Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari filed in Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In granting the petition, the Court agreed to take up two distinct issues....more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Appeal Challenging Constitutionality of CFPB’s Single-Director Structure

King & Spalding on

On October 18, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a decision from the Ninth Circuit that affirmed the constitutionality of the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). The CFPB is an agency...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

SCOTUS sets briefing schedule in Seila Law

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court has set a briefing schedule in Seila Law, in which the questions before the court are whether the CFPB’s structure is constitutional and, if it is not, whether the court can sever the provision in the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to decide CFPB’s constitutionality

Ballard Spahr LLP on

This past Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it has agreed to decide whether the CFPB’s single-director-removable-only-for-cause structure is constitutional.  The Court granted Seila Law’s petition for a writ of...more

Snell & Wilmer

Fort Bend County v. Davis: SCOTUS Bends Employers' Defense to Title VII Claims, But Doesn't Break It

Snell & Wilmer on

On June 3, 2019, the United States Supreme Court ("Supreme Court") unanimously held in Fort Bend County v. Davis that federal courts may be able to hear claims brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title...more

Snell & Wilmer

SCOTUS to Consider USPTO’s Attorneys’ Fees Policy

Snell & Wilmer on

On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Iancu v. NantKwest to resolve a circuit split concerning “expenses” a patent applicant must pay when challenging the United States Patent and Trademark...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Administrative Proceedings in Peril? Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Lucia v. SEC

• On January 12, 2018, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Lucia v. SEC, to resolve a circuit split over whether the SEC’s administrative law judges serve in violation of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. •...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Is a Patent a Private or Public Right? -- Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments in Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. Greene's...

Leading up to the Supreme Court oral argument for Oil States Energy Services, LLC. v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC on November 27, 2017, there was a lot of discussion regarding whether patents were a private or public right. ...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene's Energy Group, LLC -- Positions Taken in Selected Amicus Curiae Briefs

On November 27, 2017, the Supreme Court considered the question of whether the inter partes review process established by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in implementing portions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act or...more

Snell & Wilmer

Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of AIA Inter Partes Review Proceedings

Snell & Wilmer on

The Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari challenging the constitutionality of inter partes review proceedings conducted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office under the America Invents Act. The Court’s...more

Knobbe Martens

Supreme Court Will Decide Whether IPRs Are Unconstitutional

Knobbe Martens on

The Supreme Court granted a petition for writ of certiorari to address whether inter partes review – an adversarial process used by the Patent Office to determine the validity of existing patents – is unconstitutional in Oil...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

High Court to Address Constitutionality of Inter Partes Reviews

On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court in Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group, No. 16-712 (U.S. June 12, 2017) granted certiorari to decide next term if certain American Invents Act (AIA) review proceedings,...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Supreme Court to Review the Constitutionality of AIA Patent Review Proceedings

Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in a case that may have profound implications for U.S. patent law by abolishing inter partes reviews at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). In Oil States Energy...more

22 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide