News & Analysis as of

America Invents Act › Post-Grant Review › Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act is a United States federal statute enacted in 2011 aimed at simplifying the U.S. patent system and allowing inventions to be brough to market sooner. The AIA makes significant... more +
The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act is a United States federal statute enacted in 2011 aimed at simplifying the U.S. patent system and allowing inventions to be brough to market sooner. The AIA makes significant changes to the patent system, including changing from a first-to-invent scheme to a first-to-file scheme, eliminating interference proceedings and developing post-grant opposition.  less -
Jones Day

USPTO Proposes Expanding Opportunities for Non-Registered Practitioners

Jones Day on

The PTO has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding who may represent parties in PTAB post-grant trials. The proposal is part of the USPTO’s wider initiative to expand access to practice before the Office. ...more

BakerHostetler

The End of the Fight Against Fintiv

BakerHostetler on

Inter partes reviews (IPRs) and post-grant reviews (PGRs) are proceedings in front of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that allow a petitioner to challenge a patent’s validity and a patent owner to defend that...more

Venable LLP

PTAB Proposes Rules Governing Director Review of PTAB Decisions

Venable LLP on

On April 16, 2024, the PTAB proposed new rules (“proposed rules”) governing the Director Review process, which would remain consistent with the Interim review process currently in place, and codify those procedures....more

WilmerHale

USPTO’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Discretionary Denial Briefing, Section 325(d), Instituting Parallel and Serial...

WilmerHale on

On April 19, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that proposes rules regarding the exercise of discretion to determine whether to institute an Inter Partes...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

IP Hot Topic: USPTO Publishes Long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking with Updates to PTAB Practice and Procedure

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

On April 19, 2024, the USPTO published a long-awaited Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that followed its April 2023 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM). The proposed rules package, Patent Trial and Appeal Board...more

Fish & Richardson

USPTO Issues Proposed Rules on Discretionary Denial in PTAB Proceedings

Fish & Richardson on

One year ago, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) that set forth several ideas related to America Invents Act (AIA) proceedings before the Patent Trial...more

WilmerHale

USPTO Issue Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Rules Governing Director Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decisions

WilmerHale on

On April 16, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding Director Review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in America Invents Act (AIA)...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

USPTO Seeks to Cement PTAB Motion to Amend Pilot Program

Womble Bond Dickinson on

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking to revise its rules on amendment practice under the America Invents Act (AIA). Specifically, the USPTO is proposing...more

WilmerHale

PTAB/USPTO Update - March 2024

WilmerHale on

On February 13, the USPTO issued inventorship guidance for AI-assisted innovations. The guidance, effective as of February 13, 2024, emphasizes that AI-assisted inventions are not categorically unpatentable and the...more

Fish & Richardson

USPTO Proposes Rules Updating Motion to Amend Practice Before the PTAB

Fish & Richardson on

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) today proposing to update its rules governing motions to amend before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). ...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

PTAB Spotlight Series with Jason Eisenberg

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

In our PTAB Spotlight Series, attorneys will share their valuable insights on PTAB practice today, the challenges and opportunities clients face, and the trends practitioners should follow. Jason D. Eisenberg is a director...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2023 PTAB Year in Review: Editors’ Introduction

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

A review of 2023 reveals it was an active and impactful year in shaping the policy and practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). In fact, all three...more

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

2023 PTAB Year in Review: Analysis & Trends

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

This Year in Review synthesizes key events and decisions from 2023 into a digestible guide that we hope will serve as a helpful reference for those who practice before, or adjacent to, the PTAB. As in the past, many of our...more

Goodwin

Issue 43: PTAB Trial Tracker

Goodwin on

Petitioner Allowed to Proceed in “Understudy Role” - In American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Neo Wireless, LLC, IPR2023-0791 (P.T.A.B. March 30, 2023), American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“Honda”) filed a “copycat” Petition...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2023)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

One of the many changes introduced into U.S. patent law by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act were provisions for post-grant review (PGR) and inter partes review (IPR).  There have been thousands of these proceedings...more

Proskauer - Minding Your Business

Deadline Dexterity: PTAB Has Authority to Issue Decisions After Statutory Deadline

Proskauer - Minding Your Business on

Recently, in Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc., the Federal Circuit held for the first time that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) has the authority to issue a Final Written Decision even...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Status Quo Has Few Defenders at PREVAIL Act Senate Subcommittee Hearing

McDermott Will & Emery on

On November 8, 2023, the US Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property heard testimony from four witnesses on the proposed Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership (PREVAIL) Act....more

Troutman Pepper

USPTO Director Review — Patents: Post-Grant Podcast

Troutman Pepper on

Please join Troutman Pepper’s Intellectual Property and Health Sciences practice groups for our podcast series focused on strategies, trends, and other happenings in post-grant proceedings at the U.S. Patent Office (USPTO). ...more

Haug Partners LLP

The Many Flavors of Inter Partes Review Estoppel: A Review and Update

Haug Partners LLP on

I. Introduction - The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”) was years in the making.  From the first patent reform bill introduced by Representative Lamar Smith in June 20052 until the final House and Senate debates in...more

Farella Braun + Martel LLP

What Patent Bills Would Mean for Infringement Litigation

Farella Braun + Martel LLP on

Two bills recently introduced in Congress could significantly affect the current patent litigation landscape. The bipartisan bills are titled the Patent Eligibility Restoration Act of 2023 and the Promoting and Respecting...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

USPTO Shares Data on Multiple IPR Challenges

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

One of the many criticisms of the post-grant review proceedings instituted by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, both post-grant review (PGR) available within 9 months of patent grant based on all provisions of the Patent...more

Venable LLP

PTAB Eliminates POP Review and Expands Director Review to Institution Decisions

Venable LLP on

As of July 24, 2023, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) revised the interim Director Review process and replaced the Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) with the Appeals Review Panel process, which will review...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Senator Coons And Co-Sponsors Introduce the PREVAIL Act

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

In addition to his efforts regarding patent subject matter eligibility law (see "Senate Bill Proposed to Provide Subject Matter Eligibility Solution", co-sponsored with Senator Tillis), Senator Coons, joined by Senators...more

Kilpatrick

A Distillation of the USPTO’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: “Changes under Consideration to Discretionary Institution Practices,...

Kilpatrick on

On April 20, 2023, the USPTO announced Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for potential PTAB reforms. The goal of the Notice was to seek public input regarding proposed changes to discretionary institution practices,...more

McDermott Will & Emery

PTO Requests Comments on Revisions to AIA Trial Proceedings

McDermott Will & Emery on

On April 21, 2023, the US Patent & Trademark Office (PTO) announced that it is seeking public input on proposed modifications to the rules of practice for inter partes reviews (IPRs) and post grant reviews (PGRs) before the...more

270 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 11
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide