The LathamTECH Podcast — Getting Deals Done: Tackling Antitrust Challenges in Tech M&A
Daily Compliance News: May 12, 2025, The Corruption in the Broad Daylight Edition
Business Better Podcast Episode: Bridging Campuses: Legal Insights on Education Industry Consolidation – Mergers, Acquisitions, and Antitrust
Antitrust Considerations in Long-Term Care — Assisted Living and the Law Podcast
State AGs File NIL Antitrust Lawsuits — Highway to NIL Podcast
Drafting Consumer Breach Notices — From a Litigation Perspective - Unauthorized Access Podcast
Antitrust Conversations: Antitrust Litigation
JONES DAY PRESENTS®: Cryptocurrency and Antitrust Litigation
JONES DAY TALKS®: Private Antitrust Litigation in Spain
JONES DAY TALKS®: Takeaways from a Landmark Cryptocurrency Antitrust Case
JONES DAY TALKS®: Private Antitrust Litigation in France
JONES DAY TALKS®: Private Antitrust Litigation in Italy
JONES DAY TALKS®: Private Antitrust Litigation in the Netherlands
JONES DAY TALKS®: Private Antitrust Litigation in Germany
JONES DAY TALKS®: Private Antitrust Litigation in Europe: The Big Picture
Nota Bene Episode 68: The Current Antitrust Enforcement Climate in the United States with Capitol Forum Senior Editor Nate Soderstrom
International Litigation and Transactions in the Face of GDPR – A Panel Preview
Jones Day Talks: Game Over? Alston and the Future of Pay-for-Play in College Sports
Employment Law This Week: Antitrust Guidance for HR, EEOC Strategic Enforcement Plan, New I-9 Form, Wage Statement Challenge
Health Care Antitrust & the Supreme Court – Interview with Bruce Sokler, Member, Mintz Levin
On May 23, 2025, a panel for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed the application of the “unclean hands” doctrine to antitrust standing. PharmacyChecker.com LLC v. LegitScript LLC, No. 24-2697...more
On August 29, 2024, the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court’s decision granting summary judgment and dismissing antitrust claims by CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX” or “Plaintiff”) against Norfolk Southern Railway Company...more
First, the Court considered whether there was sufficient evidence to conclude that the Defendants’ standards, in and of themselves, violated Section 1 and concluded there was not. Instead, the Court held that...more