News & Analysis as of

Appeals › Summary Judgment › Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

No Longer Appealing: Why Are Contractors Filing Fewer Appeals at the ASBCA?

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals’ 2024 annual report reveals—yet again—the lowest number of docketed appeals in 40 years. Where have the contractor appeals gone? Contractors filed fewer appeals with the Board...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Accord and Satisfaction: To Release, or Not Release? That is the Question.

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

Generally, an “accord and satisfaction” is an agreement between two or more contracting parties to accept an alternate agreement and performance in lieu of a preexisting contractual duty between the parties. The new...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Government Contractors May Include Restrictive Markings on ‘Unlimited Rights’ Data

McDermott Will & Emery on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed an Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) denial of summary judgment and held that a federal contractor may include certain restrictive markings on “unlimited...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide