News & Analysis as of

Apportionment Constitutional Challenges

Akerman LLP - SALT Insights

A “Source” of Consternation? The Taxation of Telecommunications Companies in Florida

Like many states, Florida’s corporate income tax regime has special rules applicable to telecommunications companies. The tricky part about taxing the telecommunications industry is how to source receipts earned from...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Moore questions: Impressions from oral argument

On December 5, 2023, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. United States, addressing the constitutionality of the section 965 transition tax, which was enacted in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Section 965...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Moore Bark Than Bite? Supreme Court Weighs In

Unless you have been living under a rock—as we tax lawyers are wont to do—you have probably been following Moore v. United States, which we last discussed.  On December 5, the tax community stepped into the spotlight...more

Miller Canfield

Will the Supreme Court Invalidate One or More Sections of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act?

Miller Canfield on

A tax case pending in the United States Supreme Court, Moore v. United States, may cause a cataclysmic change in the federal income tax. The 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution empowers Congress to impose “taxes...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Is There Taxation Without Realization? Moore May Create More Questions Than Answers

The U.S. tax system developed in response to colonial opposition to taxation without representation.  As such, Article I of the Constitution provides that Congress may not impose a “direct tax” unless the tax is “apportioned”...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Five things to know about the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Moore v. United States

The Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 26 with respect to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Moore v. United States. The question presented is whether the section 965 transition tax is a “direct tax” that violates the...more

Miller Canfield

Michigan Supreme Court to Provide Clarity on Alternative Apportionment of Income Tax for Out-of-State Companies

Miller Canfield on

The Michigan Supreme Court has agreed to hear one of the most significant cases in the country to examine the question of when the Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the U.S. Constitution require the application of an...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 27, 2018

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States announced the retirement of Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy: Justice Kennedy, nominated by President Ronald Reagan to the Supreme Court, assumed the bench in 1988. ...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Oregon Bars Use of Three Factor Apportionment Formula

McDermott Will & Emery on

In Health Net Inc. v. Dep’t of Revenue, Docket No. S063625 (Apr. 12, 2018), the Oregon Supreme Court rejected a business taxpayer’s constitutional challenges to a 1993 Oregon statute that eliminated the right to utilize a...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - February 2017

Smart & Biggar on

Federal Court of Appeal rules on non-infringing alternatives and apportionment as defences to an accounting of profits from patent infringement - On February 2, 2017, the Federal Court of Appeal released a...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

California Cities To Tax Streaming Video?

Many cities in California are considering the expansion of their Utility User Tax (UUT) to streaming video services. Such an expansion may be inconsistent with the cities’ existing ordinances, be invalid under Proposition 218...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide